Okay we get it you're an internet lawyer.
The person you responded to is talking about people who manipulate data to match their predetermined outcome. There has been a wild amount of fabrication in published papers coming to light over the past decade because funding dries up when the outcome isn't what the people controlling the funds wanted.
Sorry man, idpol was way more important than the climate. Maybe if you'd chosen someone more relatable than Greta?
The second amendment was ratified in 1791, the first machine gun (The Puckle gun), was patented in 1718, 73 years earlier.
It's not *your* wall to make that decision.
I'm pretty sure this was his job in HIMYM
Careful not to supply Internet via Ethernet over HDMI to it. (HDMI 1.4+)
> money and effort in that they didn't have to reset defaults on new PC deployments
If you are manually changing defaults on PC deployments the pain is a feature. Get your shit together.
Because they have the data points to prove it, and the incentive to make it stop happening (reputation, profit margin, etc).
Christopher fucking Nolan. I hate that man, I refuse to ever watch another of his movies.
If anyone actually tuning in? Last time I tried to talk to someone about broadcast TV they told me they don't like pirating. Also, ATSC 3.0 looks like complete advertising garbage.
productivity actually went up.
We could have avoided all of this with a moderately warm meat sack with a (D) next to their name. I really hope the Democratic party gets their shit together.
Marvelous! The super-user's going to boot me! What a finely tuned response to the situation!
