I've had this account on Slashdot since 2005 and my UID is even a prime number (think of the odds), yet all I want now is to get banned by you tranny nagger fayghots. Ban me. I hope Torvalds beats the shit out of you with a brick, you little gay pussy. I bet you run Linux on systemd instead of init or some such other extremely degenrate bull-cr*p. BSD is still fucking you up the ass, you little bitch sissy who will never be a woman.

I'm surprised you didn't pull a "in Soviet Russia, summer childs you" or some such other extremely crusty-ass and unfunny "meme" (joke, fad, just so you know I actually grew up in that era) from a time where people who knew that dumb joke would now potentially have school-age grandchildren. And I'm just some faggot who was a pre-teen when I joined Slashdot. Frosty piss. Looks like weev is the only genuine ./er left iwho's still alive nowadays.

Lmao the only reason I have just logged on to Slashdot after a nine-year hiatus is to see if any of the old-school RMS extremists doing their utmost to defend the freedom of information were still alive. Nope. All fucked up and brainwashed by the alphabet agencies. Adieu!

>Do you believe rehabilitation is impossible or do you want revenge?

I don't believe that someone who commits mass murder can be rehabilitated, no. It isn't about revenge; it's about public safety.

Someone once pointed out that hoping a rapist gets raped in prison isn't a victory for his victim(s), because it somehow gives him what he had coming to him, but it's actually a victory for rape and violence. I wish I could remember who said that, because they are right. The score doesn't go Rapist: 1 World: 1. It goes Rape: 2.

What this man did is unspeakable, and he absolutely deserves to spend the rest of his life in prison. If he needs to be kept away from other prisoners as a safety issue, there are ways to do that without keeping him in solitary confinement, which has been shown conclusively to be profoundly cruel and harmful.

Putting him in solitary confinement, as a punitive measure, is not a victory for the good people in the world. It's a victory for inhumane treatment of human beings. This ruling is, in my opinion, very good and very strong for human rights, *precisely* because it was brought by such a despicable and horrible person. It affirms that all of us have basic human rights, even the absolute worst of us on this planet.

This is precisely why I lost all interest in Oculus the instant I heard that it had been acquired by Facebook.

So basically what you're suggesting is something close to a pyramid scheme?

There's also a difference between "can not" and "cannot".
"Can not" means that copyrighting APIs is optional. "Cannot" means that APIs are not copyrightable.

I have a feeling this wouldn't work in America. The basis for government isn't trust, but fear. As someone who's lived in Finland all his life, I have to tell you the reason any of our "socialism" (!!!) and national resident registry with IDs for everybody works, is because people in office aren't fucking around, at least that much, at least yet. There is a strict culture of disdain for screwing up here in Finland, so if you're the chief of police of some town and are caught drunk driving, you're busted, doesn't matter what your status is. People in power are in power because they're servants of the public and have a responsibility, not because they're privileged little kings. This is probably the reason why we come #1 in corruption rankings as the least corrupt country.

If I were an American, and the government introduced a national registry for citizens and gave everybody an ID, I would be very suspicious and would be against it, at least if it were being implemented at a federal level. Here, though, I have no problem with it and honestly it just helps things so much, like not having to waste time when moving by telling everybody about your new address, because you can just change your address online at the population registry, and this address will be updated to all utility companies, etc. whose services you use and also the postal service. That national ID is also used for taxation, voting, medical records, etc. everything useful.

Because to those that the Web == the Internet, smartphone == an iPhone.

Okay, I would agree with you if this was about a law here in Finland or in the UK where I stay most of the time, where that's consistent with the government culture in that country, but NOT in the US. The spirit of the constitution and country is clearly minimum government intervention in private life, including nanny state behavior, regardless of whether it supposedly promotes better behavior.

Few wars aren't resource wars.

It's unfortunate that so many of my peers seem to blindly allow any kind of Facebook script/application run even if it requires the ability to post under your name, spreading spam like this. I have to admit I've clicked on a few of these links sometimes, those along the lines of "biggest boobs ever! Must watch" out of curiosity, only to be redirected to a malicious app at which point I just left the page.

The same goes for these new, legitimate news readers that tell which articles your friends read on Guardian for example, and clicking on the link leads to an app requesting permission to spy on me. No thanks, I'll just Google the damn title of the article if it's that hard to give me a direct link, ffs.

I'm not sure who or what the persons are who do this, but as someone with around 300 Facebook friends, I've received at least 5 friend requests from dummy profiles (fake name, fake profile pic, awfully "sterile" personal info) with an oddly high number of mutual friends. I doubt it was any of our teachers as they use their real profiles and friended us if they wished to, including our principal. Could it be some sort of a bot for harvesting personal information that would otherwise be inaccessible to non-friends, or just a stalker from within my/my friends' social circle who's trying to remain anonyous?