Then after the dust from the auctions sets, make each new domain exponentially more costly to obtain.
So basically what you're suggesting is something close to a pyramid scheme?
As long as the government is intervening in their every day life by providing a safety net for their irresponsible decisions, how is this a bad thing?
Okay, I would agree with you if this was about a law here in Finland or in the UK where I stay most of the time, where that's consistent with the government culture in that country, but NOT in the US. The spirit of the constitution and country is clearly minimum government intervention in private life, including nanny state behavior, regardless of whether it supposedly promotes better behavior.
"Ulevitch's complaint also stems from the fact that the error redirector breaks some of OpenDNS's functionality. If an OpenDNS user types "digg.xom" by mistake, their browser pulls up the correct "digg.com" instead. But the redirector breaks the free service's typo correction — as well as the browser shortcut feature it unveiled last month. "Google's application breaks just about every user-benefiting feature we provide with client software that no user ever asked for," Ulevitch said.
One possible reason that things aren't going according to plan is that there never was a plan in the first place.