Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:The enshittification is proceeding apace (Score 2) 64

On the plus side, TV has hit rock bottom decades ago,

No it didn't. The last 15 years have arguably been the high point of TV.

Decades ago, let's say 30 years to 20 years. Well, 30 years ago was about the first ever show with an entire multi-season story arc plotted out in advance (Babylon 5). There were of course many missteps because literally no one had done it before and the studio had no fucking idea what to do with it. It probably took another 10 years before people finally figured out how to execute such a thing. And now they've got good at properly executing single and multi-season arcs.

For example.

That's not to say there aren't some decent shows from the 90s and 2000s. There were a lot of shows after all, but quite a lot of them feel somewhat dated. Slow moving, clunky plots, weird retconning and plot holes due to lack of proper planning.

Minor point of order good sir, B5, as good as it was, wasn't the first show with a planned multi season story arc. The first American show was Hill Street Blues (1981) and there are earlier examples from the UK including The Prisoner (technically it only counts as 1 season but the story was split into 3 distinct parts with different themes) and Doctor Who would frequently revisit previous story lines. It could also be argued that ST:TNG had a multi season story arc with Q and Picard, they definately got the hang of it with DS9.

It's a bit of a shame what happened with B5, it was originally planned for 5 seasons but WB wouldn't commit to the 5th season so JMS had to wrap it up in the 4th... so he was effectively out of ideas when they greenlit the 5th.

Comment Re:Ah, the ketamine's Nazi's selling bullhit again (Score 1) 226

As much AI computing as necessary to drive all those 10 million robotaxis on Mars, right?

This is one of the biggest signs that AI's about to take a huge stumble and probably a fall as well... Musk is gloating about how much it's going to take off.

Comment Re:Liar (Score 3, Insightful) 226

I don't know.
I mean, I can see where you're coming from, but at the same time- I don't find it hard to swallow that he actually does believe his own dumb shit, like FSD will happen with only cameras.

This is the motherfucker that argued with scientists about nuking mars, like they were the morons.

Musk's fans have mistaken autism for intelligence. He's simply not that fucking intelligent.
He is a dreamer- I will give him that. But the guy isn't any more a business genius than Bill Gates or Jeff Bezos were before him. He was in the right place at the right time, with the right dream.

So honestly, I don't think he's lying when he says that dumb shit. I think he's just a fucking dumbass, who mistakes his success as proof of hyperintelligence.

A rather significant point of order good sir,

It's not Autism. Actual functional autistic people really don't need the comparison, they're not like Musk at all.

Musk has a complete disconnect from reality and is insulated from the consequences of his actions. This is the ideal environment for an antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) to flourish. Musk might also have ADHD, but again that's not to blame for how he acts and the disregard he has for anyone but himself, that's far more the realm of an ASPD. Autistic people do feel empathy, they're just not able to express themselves normally, people like Musk have no empathy what so ever.

I think we need to stop using autism as an excuse... especially for things like sociopathy and psychopathy.

Comment Re:Noble, but missing one key thing (Score 3, Interesting) 52

Most users are not very savvy, especially around new software.

That didn't stop people using Teams, a program that not only was rolled out to everyone with virtually no information beyond a few popup tooltips or training, but a program that drastically differed from the norms of other software (like no multi window support).

The users will be fine.

Just like the Office Ribbon caused a complete breakdown... oh wait, it didn't.

The "users can't accept change" excuse hasn't been valid for nearly 20 years now as almost everyone who grew up without a computer is nearing retirement. It's as stale and wrong as the "but who do I sue if things go wrong" argument (you can't sue MS if things go wrong, they have pages of legalese in the T&Cs expressly to prevent this).

People will adapt, those that don't will just find themselves in crappy, dead end jobs.

Comment Re: Noble, but missing one key thing (Score 2) 52

Capitalist efficiency is a myth beyond SMEs. From a certain size on upwards, it goes to hell. To be fair, soviet-type manufacturing efficiency is pretty much the same or worse and they also have worse product quality issues in general. But then I look at where Win11 stands now and it is clear that capitalism with monopolies in place can match soviet incompetence easily.

This. Bureaucracy is a function of size, not ownership.

I've worked in more small companies (sub 5000 employees) that have far too onerous bureaucracies compared to their size, more political infighting and fiefdoms than any of the government departments I've worked for. You understand why something the size of the NHS has it's bureaucracy, it's fucking massive so it can't function without it... However a mid size consultancy firm shouldn't have more, let alone significantly more and the NHS is pretty efficient once you consider how big it is and how many different functions it has to perform.

Comment Re: As someone who can afford a BMW (Score 1) 161

They're not that expensive used. My 2nd car was a BMW - 11 years old but in excellent shape (and old gentleman owned it and basically drove it from his garage to his company garage twice a week or so). It cost 8000 Euros. I drove it for years and was very happy with it. Then I sold it for 4000 Euros.

Comment Re:Liar (Score 4, Informative) 226

Hmmmm. Microsoft did just fine with lying (even in court), and Enron would have gotten away with it too if it wasn't for those pesky kids and their mangy brownouts.

Psychologists argue that a primary trait of a good CEO is psychopathy, since it requires a personality that has no remorse or compassion and a willingness to do whatever it takes.

Comment Re:Remember you don't need a union (Score 1) 74

Where in Europe can a union go on a strike at a whim without notice? Not even in France is that an option. And the underlying principles still apply even if not legal. A union which strikes arbitrarily (resulting in their members losing income for the duration) would find themselves not facing heat from a corporation, but rather from the members themselves.

Don't explain to us where this happened, provide evidence that it did so we can see if it was true, or STFU.

It's just the typical anti-union propaganda that gets passed around by the Daily Mail. It never actually happened.

Unions are not completely innocent by far but they exist for a reason and that reason is that bosses were left unchecked for far too long and far too many abuses were committed. If we tallied up the abuses by companies vs the abuses by unions in the same time frame, you wouldn't even be able to see the abuses by unions column if the graph were projected on the side of a 20 floor building.

Slashdot Top Deals

I have hardly ever known a mathematician who was capable of reasoning. -- Plato

Working...