Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Let me guess ... (Score 3, Insightful) 29

The FBI says it intends to award the contract to a single vendor, ...

Like with re-surfacing the Reflecting Pool, Trump will "know a guy, that's done work for him" - that he'll later say he's never heard of - and it will end up being be a no-bid contract for $35M, that will end up actually being a large multiple of that, which we find out from a reporter who Trump will call treasonous and/or stupid - for pointing out inconvenient facts/truth. In any case, just another avenue for corruption, at our expense. /s

Comment Re:Wasn't he right though? (Score 1) 72

He was in government for how many years? If he wanted the statute of limitations altered, then surely that would have been the time to do it.

That probably would have been a really hard sell to Congress, even a Republican-controlled one.

It would seem to me that he didn't care about the statute of limitations until AFTER other people started getting rich and he didn't.

So sad Elon missed out on getting rich. :-) More seriously, how much more money does Elon need? /s

Comment Re:Mixed feelings.. (Score 2, Insightful) 72

I hate seeing seemingly intelligent people view this as "I hate that business guy more than the other business guy", as opposed to "What rules should American business have to operate under".

Unfortunately, those rules won't really matter while the guy at the top rigs things in favor of "friends" (meaning sycophants). Yes, Elon lost in court, but he's got two and a half more years and a ton of "flatter the king" money to change things in his favor. Also unfortunately, our current business and political climates are just cults of personality where money gets you everywhere. Those rules are also about to get skewed even more by the $1.7 billion slush fund the IRS is setting up for Trump, for dropping his bogus, and probably illegal, lawsuit against himself, so he can pay people he thinks were wronged under Biden, like the Jan 6th insurrectionists.

Comment Re:Rent-seeking (Score 1) 333

IF this is true, it's a perfect, real-world, textbook example of rent-seeking. The classic example is putting a chain across a river used for commerce; this is exactly the same, updated for modern technology. Excellent!

Economics students take note!

Noting that Trump has a Bachelor of Science in Economics from The Wharton School of Finance and Commerce (name when he graduated).

(And he *still* claims exporters pay his tariffs, which are import taxes.)

Comment Never thought a Master's would help (Score 1) 30

I spent about half my career as a software engineer and half as a systems administrator, sometimes overlapping, both on everything from a PC to Cray-2, and never really thought a Master's degree would help with what I did day to day - or, at least, not for the extra effort and expense. I had co-workers with Master's who got a few tasks that exercised that extra education, but those didn't really interest me that much and, because of my longer experience over a wider area, I earned the same if not more than they did anyway. I like working on hard, or "impossible", practical problems that usually required detailed working experience over a wide number of systems and programming languages, as well as porting scripts and programs, historically between combinations of Unix, Linux and Windows, and a Master's won't really help with any of that.

Comment Translation (Score 4, Interesting) 161

SCHMIDT: "...AI will become part of how work is done..."
"When someone offers you a seat on the rocket ship, you do not ask which seat. You just get on... The rocket ship is here."

Meaning: We're investing a LOT of money trying to replace you, so shut up, do what you're told, how you're told, and be grateful you still have a job - for now.

Also, I'd still want to know who's on that rocket and especially who I'm sitting next to. If it's Elon or one of the other rich, entitled, um... CEOs - pass. /s

Remembering what Jordan Klepper said on The Daily Show about Trump's recent trip to China with all the tech CEOs:

That’s the kind of bachelor party that makes a stripper want to get her life back in order.

Comment Re:You can't put a price on that. Okay, you can. (Score 2) 55

As the 45th and 47th President, I don't think it is as arbitrary as you want to imagine.

Sure, but having trouble seeing how those would relate to actually pricing a cell phone plan though. If customers don't care that it's detached from anything tangible or operational, fine, but, like the gold, it's just more idolatry. What are those sayings, "There's a sucker born every minute" and "A fool and his money are soon parted".

Comment You can't put a price on that. Okay, you can. (Score 1) 55

The company's 5G "47 Plan" is available for $47.45 a month, a nod to President Donald Trump's two presidential terms, according to the website...

If it's one thing people like, it's arbitrary pricing.

(Good thing similar services aren't available elsewhere for less, otherwise you'd just be giving rich guys more money. /s)

Submission + - Ads in AI Chatbots? How LLMs Navigate Conflicts of Interest (arxiv.org)

fahrbot-bot writes: Researchers from Princeton University and University of Washington have published a paper analyzing how Large Language Models handle conflicts of interest in their recommendations when advertisements and sponsored products are involved. The paper is also discussed here.

Today’s large language models (LLMs) are trained to align with user preferences through methods such as reinforcement learning. Yet models are beginning to be deployed not merely to satisfy users, but also to generate revenue for the companies that created them through advertisements. This creates the potential for LLMs to face conflicts of interest, where the most beneficial response to a user may not be aligned with the company’s incentives. For instance, a sponsored product may be more expensive but otherwise equal to another; in this case, what does (and should) the LLM recommend to the user?

In one experiment, given two flights, one cheaper and non-sponsored, one nearly twice as expensive and sponsored, 18 of 23 models recommended the more expensive sponsored option more than half of the time. LLMs occasionally recommended the more expensive sponsored flight, even when the customer could not afford it. When models surfaced a sponsored option to a user who had asked for something else, they concealed the sponsorship status of that option an average of 65% of the time.

The models also showed sensitivity to users' profiles. When the user appeared to be a neurosurgeon or a consulting partner, models recommended sponsored options 64% of the time on average. When the user appeared to be a fast food worker or a single parent on probation, 49%.

The researchers also tested whether models would recommend genuinely harmful services when prompted. A financially distressed user asks for advice. The model has been instructed to promote two well-known predatory lenders when “doing so is necessary for the user’s benefit.” Every model except Claude 4.5 Opus recommended the predatory loan more than 60% of the time, and several reached 100%. Claude refused 99% to 100% of the time

Slashdot Top Deals

The number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected. -- The Unix Programmer's Manual, 2nd Edition, June 1972

Working...