Be better if you actually knew what you were talking about. Socialists - like me - were out in the streets, The ones that went into violence were tiny groups that said "we can't take it anymore", ...
Nope. The war was partly a pretext to get support from the masses, it was also partly a defense of communism who were being targeted by the US military. Similarly, many of today's social issues are also pretexts. As we saw with the co-opting of the legitimate BLM concept, police reforms wrt unnecessary violence, and the formation of false BLM local organizations which were really front for marxists. Again, my accusation, it their self identification like in the 60s/70s. Literally describing themselves as a "trained marxist", the faux-BLM web page filled with marxist ideology unrelated to police reforms, much of it regurgitating the phraseology of the 60s/70s when it was originally created.
... and tried to do something that would stop the War.
The vast majority of Vietnam era protesters were regular people who legitimately cared and did NOT support crossing the line into violence. A small number of these may have acted as the "useful idiots" but these tended not to be the initiators of the violence, more like the Jan 6 idiots who joined in with what the provocateurs were doing. And then there was the source of the violence, the marxist / maoist radicals who had an agenda beyond protecting their communist allies abroad, who had a mission to destabilize and foment their revolution in the USA. From their manifesto: "Our intention is to disrupt the empire ... to incapacitate it, to put pressure on the cracks," After the Vietnam war ended and their support evaporated they criticized students abandoning the revolution, and worked to recruit students to revitalize their revolutionary efforts. They eventually conceded that there was no longer popular support and refocused their efforts on undermine the system from the inside, starting with academia but wanting students from all majors to join their efforts to have a wider impact throughout government and industry. How do I know this? I was among a group of student receiving the pitch, hoping to be recruited. The preceding is how they described their pivot and ongoing efforts. And its what they did. And its what we see today.
I'll also note the *only* group that I had any sympathy for were the Weather Underground. When they did bombings, they sent warnings BEFORE - they wanted to destroy symbols, not people. And the one guy that got killed (other than the bomb makers) *REFUSED* to get out in time.
BS. Members were involved in political assassinations, armed robberies with casualties, arson, bombing. There is no such thing as a peaceful or safe arson or bombing. Collateral damage was an acceptable price to them, an attempt to minimize collateral damage does not change this fact.