IMO, what happened then was far more like many of the other federal and state building "take overs" that were happening around the nation at the time and NOT an act of "terrorism" or "insurrection"
Sorry about your vision and mental problems.
This was always the case. No one owes me a tech job. Evolve or die.
You'd better evolve into something that cares about humans if you want to live, then.
Chrome supports open standards
Google also abuses the standards-making process through Chrome.
Why did Democrats refuse to prosecute Trump the "child rapist" when he was a mere civilian?
They didn't. And the files were sealed.
holding the power of the auto-pen Presidency
Trump pardoned all the J6 terrorists via autopen. Get fucked, poser.
By making people dependent on their cloud perpetual subscription versions.
Right, they want them dependent on the applications, and providing the OS is no longer necessary to accomplish that.
Demand in the states is still massive. Maybe not for a "designer" but certainly for coders that work with AI well.
You are helping to engineer your own demise. Not sure what else you should do really, but definitely don't get smug.
If the vast majority of Americans lived frugally, saving some money for emergencies and investing most of the rest of their money in diversified stocks and bonds, spending only what they need to cover good medical care, healthy food and exercise opportunities, a sufficient but small house/apartment and transportation, and minimal luxuries....we would experience severe deflation and unemployment.
Really no. The wealthy get most of the money. The wealthy spend less of the money. When the poor get it, it's spent about five times before it comes to rest in a tax dodge. When the wealthy get it, it's spent only about twice. What we need is for the wealthy to spend money like they pretend they do, in order to create jobs like they pretend they do.
Look at the sprawling HQs with fancy buildings that are set up by so many companies when they could have gone with simple brutalist architecture.
Apple goes with simple brutalist complying with China.
And Microsoft themself is now acting to make that dependence on Windows go away, with web-based versions of their applications. I think they can see that Windows' time is limited. Maintaining an OS is a big thankless job that they don't need to do, and they're not any good at it so it's not like they deserve thanks anyway.
Every one of them will do nothing but gaslight and lie to you, because they're Subhuman Fucking Disgusting Sociopaths and dangers to humanity.
"DEATH TO PEDOPHILES!" they chant... "BUT NOT THE ORANGE MESSIAH CHILD RAPIST, HE'S SPECIAL!"
the vehicles start looking more like a wingless airplane than a car.
And what does the company's name mean?
It adds up to 40 miles per day, not 5. 5 would be a cloudy day.
I used to be anti-solar-panels-on-cars back when solar panels were expensive, and ones of reasonable efficiency were even more expensive - the argument was, "put it on your roof where it belongs". But that's just not the case any more. Adding solar is just not that much of a cost to the car. It adds some complexities, but mainly in the design / early manufacturing phase.
Also:
The average American drives 37 miles per day.
1) So if you're in a sunny climate, it covers all of said average-driver's driving. Otherwise, said average-driver has to plug in occasionally, but not nearly as often.
2) Most people drive less than the average (the average is skewed by a long-tail - small numbers of people who drive very far every year). What you actually should be meaning is the median US driver; the median drives 23 miles per day. Most Europeans, even less.
3) Even for said "average american", their daily average is skewed by long drives (e.g. road trips and similar). Wheren of course you're plugging in, you'd be plugging in even if the car was adding 80 miles a day. But when not on road trips, their daily average is lower.
4) Surely you can see the appeal of the tangential benefits, such as being unstrandable - where even if you run out in the middle of the desert 20 miles from the nearest town, you're still going to get there, just delayed (remember that EV ranges, if you drive very slowly, increase like 2x, so 40 miles a day becomes 80, so a 20 mile shortfall is only a ~4h delay on a sunny day).
5) Nobody is saying, "One car for everybody". Of course appeal varies by person and by location. Here in Iceland for example we have three problems. One, very little sun at all for a good chunk of the year. Two, even in the summer, when the days are long, the sun is mainly low and circles around you. Solar power just kinda sucks here in general. And three, the three-wheel config would mean that the centre wheel wouldn't align with tracks in the snow from other cars (although there is a slight advantage, in that it also wouldn't align with road ruts from studded tyres, which often fill with water in the rain and become hazardous).
But somewhere in the southern US, it's a great option.
There was a Sonnax fix for my ZF5HP42A valve body problems too. It didn't work.
Security is possible
Security is not a boolean.
Of all the things I wish I had gotten when my father died, his 1962 Chevy C10 with the 292 and 4 speed is at the absolute top. I would have updated from points to electronic ignition, though.
There's no such thing as a free lunch. -- Milton Friendman
