What makes you think the inner workings of the AI will be used as evidence in court at all? The entire thing hinges on financial decisions made by Altman and whether they violate the non-profit structure as agreed upon during OpenAIs founding.

They probably used an AI to edit it.

I'm not so sure that's a true statement.

Hell, in the US, growing a garden is "Interstate Commerce" and subject to federal law.

Jon Stewart used to say that he has a shoebox full of photos that guarantee he would never be elected president.

>2027: Bezel-less iPhone 20

Fat finger hell, you'll always be holding it wrong.

No thank you.

That is all.

I think the closest the Democrats have would be comedians like Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert (generally similar to Al Franken, as you mentioned).

George Washington was the commanding officer of a street party? That's an interesting way of putting it.

Nothing new to see here. Looks like a Gentex FDM, which has been around for years.

Username checks out

because only a few at every level of government liked them *and* their legal status is very dubious

There, there. With enough of China-sponsored whipping up, the liking of a nuclear weapons research lab can be sunk overnight just as well. Indeed, this very story describes a symptom of that happening.

the rule of law is excruciatingly imperiled atm

"At the moment"? Laughing out loud...

That only works if it can do duckies and bunnies.

This effectively is a fight between two branches of government, one federal, the other municipal

Federal government is at quite a disadvantage on local level — as ICE have found out dealing with other (or the same) anti-Americans.

David just might defeat Goliath

David was neither an insurrectionist, nor given aid or comfort to the enemies of his government.

I think you have the power-dynamic all backwards.

You do. Government's — even local town government's — power over businesses is immense and quite literally keeps us all from having good things.