"emacs... still widely used."

The world "widely" is doing a lot of the heavy lifting there. It is not even top 20 according to stack overflow.

They're a real waste of space, huh?

Ed, man! !man, ed

So that just brings us right back to my question about why someone reviewing code for a file system would care about that level of detail. Like you said, the paper is from 1996; anyone working on file systems 30 years later already knows about bit flips.

Sure, but is the cited paper about file systems, radiation hardening of aerospace hardware, or something else entirely? My point isn't whether or not the phrase is a real scientific term used by physicists, the point is whether or not the phrase is meaningful or relevant to someone reviewing the code for a file system.

I understand everything you said, but the quoted line is still phrased pretty awkwardly. I frequently hear people talking about radiation, cosmic rays, etc. (I'm not an aerospace engineer myself, but I work with a lot of them). I don't think I've ever heard anyone talking about atmospheric neutrons though. Being that specific almost never matters to anyone except maybe the engineers working specifically on the radiation hardening.

And "the medium is not exempt" is just weird.

Extrapolate how? Why would you assume that the difference scales linearly with size?

The summary isn't clear on this. I also initially thought that it was talking about programs written in Rust and being managed by systemd's init/service management. But that can't be what's now supported, because systemd should be able to launch anything that's executable (any compiled binary, shell or Python scripts, etc.). So my guess is that this is some kind of systemd library that now has a Rust version.

Sony have been working with AMD on a bespoke solution for the base ps5 called qssr which is an adaptation of the Pssr of the PS5 Pro. Being tailored specifically for the PS5/Pro, those solutions in theory will be better than FSR4 which is meant to work on such broader spectrum of hardware.

I remember seeing a discussion about a sci-fi show (Babylon 5, for anyone else who remembers the discussion) where someone said basically the same thing about a dead body sticking to the outside of a space station. If you do the math, though, you'll find that it doesn't take as much mass as you might think for an object to have enough gravity to pull in free-floating objects.

Wikipedia says Phobos' escape velocity is 11.39 m/s (41 km/h), which is enough to hold down a jumping human. So all the probe needs to do to reach an orbit around Phobos is slow down enough.

Statistical contortions might provide copium, but don't prove anything. I gave you a straightforward parameter median household income. Something economists have been using for generations. You had to cherry-pick — and your cherry is rotten, because you complained about the period of COVID lock-downs, much of it presided over by your champion.

And you provided no citations. No wonder, your moderation is so high :)

Also Trump is wrecking the economy and nobody wants to acknowledge that

Because it just is not true. Median household incomes in the US are just steadily rising (inflation-adjusted) since he took office in 2024.

If that is the problem, it would be simpler to filter out cruel prompts before using them for training.

It wasn't.

That's easy, just post a comment on Slashdot.