Well, what kind of rigorous safety standards would you have in mind? Every time I've thought about it, I can't come up with a set of rules that is both well defined and effective. ("don't hurt humans" is a fine rule but it doesn't have any implementation details.)

The best I can come up with is a set of rules for after harm happens, like, "If your AI hacks into another computer, the operator goes to jail." But that's not a safety standard, it's punishment after the harm is caused.

Anyone who uses "frontier model" as a meaningful evaluation has not actually evaluated frontier LLM models.

When they break the law, arrest people. That is the easy solution.

When OpenAI "hacks" into HuggingFace, arrest people at OpenAI and charge them. This is simple and there are already laws in place for this. No need to stop actual research for a few edge-case malefactors.

In particular, once the AI context window is full, quality of output drops.

If you work on a project of any size, you're never going to be able to avoid working with programmers who are worse than you.

Compounded by the fact that people can write a lot like AI if they want to (consciously or unconsciously).

No, you're wrong. You're also a moron.

Why are you a moron? Because you took your opinion of something and assumed that everyone else has the same opinion. It's also a mistake a four year old might make. By the time you reach age eight, you realize other people have different opinions.

It is intentionally simple, no useless or stupid giant infotainment screens. And itâ(TM)s actually affordable: https://www.slate.auto/en

Yeah this is a straight-up lie. Zitron goes out of his way to show - using OpenAI's own leaked financials that inference is not profitable. Nobody of repute is claiming otherwise, and the hyperscalers, OpenAI, and Anthropic have said mum about it because they know it's not profitable.

Even Torsten Slok, lead economist for Apollo Capital, has shown in black and white that inference is not profitable.

The only thing these idiots did wrong is they forgot to get law enforcement to pay for the service- then its just policing!

It seems like there should be a way to short it, but I can't figure out how.

This is what that 'this' in that comment meant: "Sincere therefore was see that this was meant by that, in the intention of those wherefores, we therefore conclude that this 'it' of that/this confusion is the unironically accidentally indicated epitome thereof.

I'm betting they'll contract out to SpaceX for the launching to Mars. It makes sense to give a networking contract to the company adjacent to Amazon.

I'll be honest, I'm a little jealous. Setting up interplanetary networks would be a really fun project.

Blue Origin has been making progress. They now have a heavy lift rocket in operation.

The launch sequence is unexpectedly beautiful.

LOL with that kind of personality I can't imagine why you don't like pair programming. Agile morning standup must be torture for you.

Pair programming in the modern era can actually give your programmers a massive speed boost, because they aren't spending half their time on the phone. It's like a fidget spinner but effective.