CVS certainly is easier for small projects (e.g. three people working on their CS201 project)
It's not. Download TortoiseGit and it's just as easy to use as CVS.
"It is clear that differences between individuals cannot be eliminated simply by means of training," says Antti Oulasvirta
To be more precise, what she meant is, "We don't know how to train these people. The things we tried didn't work." I'll bet if they were less condescending it would help.
: "master" is the default branch name setting in git, despite the hysteria that suddenly caused many services to migrate to "main" (I still use "master" because why not?).
You're obviously racist. Report to HR at once, account blocked.
then it doesn't sound like you're getting too fancy. How could you screw things up?
The most common way is by rebasing changes that have already been pushed to the repository.
How many times has git screwed things up for you when all you wanted was to check in your code so it was backed up?
The answer is never. I have never done that. It's not hard.
It needs to separate backup functions (making them simple) and code merge/integration functions.
That's an interesting point.
The appeal of walking around CES again kind of wore off once I realised that so many people I would be interacting with though that trump was ok enough to vote for.
Dude, you have a butt hole. Stop acting like you're better than anyone else.
You will lose an important disk file.
