Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Still can't turn off update notice (Score 1) 110

You literally post this on every article about Firefox. Aren't you tired yet? I have replied numerous times that they are *NEVER* going to do that. And then I pointed you to using policies, which will disable updates.

Which is why I don't bother with surveys from company. If they're not going to listen to their customers, why bother doing the survey?

Having to create a policy is not the same as a simple checkbox to disable something.

One would think if customers keep complaining about something that a company would look into changing it. Such as people who complained at having to use a screen in their car to change a/c or temperature or something simple. Car manufacturers went back and put buttons and knobs in to make things easier.

Apparently Mozilla isn't interested in simple. Like so many other companies, the object is to make things as complicated, convoluted, and inconvenient as possible.

Comment Still can't turn off update notice (Score 1, Informative) 110

For all they keep doing, the one thing they can't seem to do is make a checkbox to stop being harassed about updates. Apparently there is no way to do to this. It's much too complicated for them to figure out.

Perhaps they should put out a notice asking if anyone has the skills to create the checkbox and make it work.

Comment Re:No fair, shut up about that! Just shut up! (Score 1) 132

Get back to talking about how we're whooping Iran's ass at no cost to oursel-- SHUT UP, I SAID NO COST!!!!1

You won't see this on the Fox tabloid, but the acting Navy Secretary admitted at a Congressional hearing that Iran "blew the hell" out of a naval base in Bahrain such that the USS Abraham Lincoln (sound familiar?) couldn't dock for resupply.

So yeah. Whooping Iran's ass at no cost.

Comment Re: Parents? (Score 1) 62

Kids are expected to sit in class for six hours a day then go home and potentially do homework for an hour or two.

The difference is, there are breaks in those six hours. You're in class for 55 minutes, then you get up and walk to your next class, rinse and repeat. Depending on your schedule, breaks could even be longer. You get up and move about. You're not stuck in the same chair for six hours.

Comment Re: Not an expert (Score 1) 88

No, there was no "empty space" around it. The space itself expanded in the cosmic inflation, per current theory.

Which I've always hated because it makes no sense. If space itself inflated, what did it inflate into? It's illogical, from any perspective, to say the universe was a speck of energy that suddenly expanded to create itself. If it expanded, it had to expand into something. You can't create yourself. If you say that, then all you've done is recreate, "In the beginning ..."

Comment Re:Well come on bootlickers (Score 4, Insightful) 148

Ah yes, the censorship that still allowed people to see the lies about ivermectin. Clearly an abuse of power to let people see the lies. And no, the technologies in this story were not used by Biden. So another lie which isn't being censored.

Mandatory vaccinations were for a select group of people: i.e. the military and medical workers. No one else was required to get a vaccination.

But please, continue licking RFK, Jr's boots. He needs all the help he can get.

Comment Re:Derivation of the Radial Acceleration Relation (Score 1) 29

Thank you checking the document with the highest models. I do not use those since I would run out of credits very quickly.

Can you send the full analysis to my email address which is in the document? It seems most of the complaints concern the GR stuff which is expected. But the RAR derivation does not really connect to that. Appendix A gives a mathematical explanation using wavenumbers and 3 different AI models (not the highest) agreed it is correct. What does Fable say about Appendix A?

Anyway, let's take this complain:
"The âoedeep-MOND amplitudeâ is an algebraic identity, not a dynamical derivation"

Of course, the amplitude is just simple algebra. But it seems Fable did not understand the picture where the justification of that algebra comes from. I did a search and the MOND literature never pinpointed the amplitude as the geometric mean of acceleration at two radii. The MOND literature simply uses sqrt(gN cH0).

I would really appreciate if you send the full analysis to me.

Comment Derivation of the Radial Acceleration Relation (Score 5, Interesting) 29

The RAR equation is an empirical equation based on 100+ galaxies data. No derivation of the equation exists.

I have an elastic vacuum model from which I derived the exact equation. The interpretation is that RAR (and MOND) describers the transient
region how cosmic expansion recovers from H=0 inside the galaxy to full H=H0. Within the elastic vacuum model the RAR equation is a prediction.

You can read the Postulates and you can jump right into chapter 9 and read also the Appendinx. You do not have to concern yourself with the GR stuff in the document.

At this point, I see 3 options.
1. The derivation is false and I use totally wrong math
2. I am extremely lucky to get this out of the vacuum model and it is just a weird coincidence
3. Maybe there is something here and treating the vacuum as a real material may have some merit.

https://www.researchgate.net/p...

If any physicist read this, feel free to contact me and point out any errors and/or inconsistencies concerning the derivation or other topics in the document.

Slashdot Top Deals

Put no trust in cryptic comments.

Working...