Basic question since I have not researched Nuclear power in a long time. The last time there was a big push and building of nuclear reactors the main problem was the spent fuel rods. The response back then was we will have developed the tech to deal with it in the future when the rods are used up. Has this happened? or are we still doing the bury it in the earth until the future when we have developed the tech to deal with it?

what do you think the old before cable tv did?

Can we have a law that says if the company states something or promises something during the buying phase then it is written in law for that company.
If they change their mind later then the current C suite gets 10 years in prison?

From this quote there is a VERY important quote.
"their senior managers could be made criminally liable."
We need to start adding this to the USA regulations instead of well here is your fine, while they just make that part of doing business.

or how about they go to jail for the amount of the sentence of the innocent person recieved. Then MAYBE they will actually do the job and investigate, including going through all information trying to exclude the suspect. If they can't exclude them and the evidence shows it was them then you have the correct suspect.

We are missing a HUGE point. It is illegal for insurance companies to use this data to adjust their pricing.
So why would the insurance companies be buying this data?

Time to start investigations on when they received the data and when their customers started receiving increases in insurance rates.

Unfortunately I call BS on this. These companies know exactly how much that raised prices on exactly which products due to tariffs. Otherwise they would not be able to forecast profit margins.
They also have a record of all CC transactions and which products were purchased and at what price. So they also know exactly who bought what, how many, and how much extra they paid in tariffs.
The companies could pay the customers back but never will.
Maybe next year we could give them a bigger tax break so they can continue to be job creators.

Just to clarify, that is $175 billion of US TAX Payers money, not the government money.
When worded like that it assumes the US Gov creates money to pay stuff with. It receives or creates money from you and me, the tax payer.
As Lindsey Gram said about Iran, "When this regime goes down, we are going to have a new Middle East, and we are going to make a tonne of money." (the we here does not include you or me)
https://www.aljazeera.com/news...

As with everything about this administration squeeze the poor / middle class to give to the rich.

ok so we will correct the wording to reiterate the statement.

"Illegally taken" What the court decided was the way in which trump implemented the tariffs was illegal.
All of the other words you used to justify it and re apply it are incorrect. Do the thing the legally correct way or it is illegal.

When was the last time wall street had mass layoffs?
How come every idea they come up with makes them tons of money and their investors take the hit?
All of those ideas 10 years later are looked at and decided that is not ethical so maybe we should make a law saying you can't do it.
Then the SEC says you can't make laws.
and around and around we go.

Now go convince the management.
They will sell out their best and brightest for short term gains, collect a golden parachute then do it again at the next company.

It is the only job I know of that you are hired to enforce what you don't know or understand.
Remember the lawyer (DA) is the one who knows the laws, the police guess and figure if it affects their authority then it is illegal.

Wait a second, so the pretense was they are "which authorities were investigating for their connection to arson, vandalism and doxing"

And the charges were dropped meaning they had done none of these things at all not even a little bit of connection (or they would have prosecuted). And we are looking at proton mail or self hosting or paying for the site as the issue?
Have we really started missing the real issue?

I noticed this line.
"and to enter special electricity rate agreements with utilities"
so when am I allowed to enter special rate agreements, that I am willing to bet a lot, that they will be lower than consumer rates.

The usa tried this going with the daylight savings time instead of standard time.
It lasted 1 year. The outrage was so great they changed it back after 1 year.
Why they didn't just adopt Standard Time is .. well... its congress what do you expect.
Why we can't just keep Standard time year round is absurd to me.