I'd even argue that for some uses the (more) consistent behavior of not having models update could be a benefit.

They're claiming 10x Cerebras (a 25kw system) performance.

100x performance per watt.

Even if they're overestimating / best casing the situation there is value to be had here.

The current frontier models have use. This could be made for one and depending on hardware cost be useful for a year and replaced (Nvidia/AMD hardware are advancing fast enough to be obsolete pretty quick too). I can see a business built around a product based on an open weight model using these in servers.

This is for end user/cloud provider products. And if these can be developed fast enough and not cost too much, there's likely a market.

That assumes you have a phone. Most of the time I'm in the store is because my phone is lost or broken.

Last time I was there inhad a phone with a blank screen.

They made me do the transaction through the app guessing where to click on the screen.

They'll just say that their AI policy optimized for team players...

Maybe they can measure token use and punish X number of standard deviations away from the norm?

They probably don't want people not using any, but also not people using too many?

Still probably not a great metric, but there's ways measuring it don't mean maximizing use, and it sounds like MS is saying that's what's happening.

It shouldn't be a problem if it's only a few hours a day I'd think.

I have an undersized AC (one window unit for a space that it can't really keep up), as long as I cool the house overnight it doesn't creep up too high during the day.

I know that's a different failure mode than giving up the ghost due to heat, but I'd think a similar pricipal would apply, cool it cooler than you normally would until noon, and it won't get too bad inside before 3 or 4?

Quified immunity is very problematic in the US (as it has been practiced).

Essentially if something isn't obviously illegal it can't lead to liability for the officer's actions.

The problem is that this means courts dismiss cases due to any level of ambiguity and the president that something is illegal (therefore making it obvious going forward) can't be set.

It basically makes the constitutional protections much lighter for new situations since courts don't hear the cases that would apply it.

Because if your service goes down for 2 hours at the same time as everyone else's and it's a news story that it's someone else's fault it doesn't look as bad as if it goes down for 1 hour when it's your fault.

That's why I put west in quotes.

I think this is less about tarrifs and more about China's care for technological independence.

Replacing dependence on a Dutch company has little to do with US tarrifs and more to do with independence from the "West".

Or noticed the trap text when they pasted the question.

I would think all the AI would follow the directive to add the nonsense. I wouldn't want to use the one that didn't.

Also likely: 10% of the class actually did the work.

I'm pretty sure the lack of Android Auto and Apple Carplay is going to kill them.

If I have one car I can plug into and have all of my settings without any setup or login (my non tech savvy mom accidentally discovered it even, just trying to charge through the USB and had a map) and already is personalized for each driver (even if I just lend it to someone for a day). Additionally I can be pretty confident it'll stay updated since Apple and Google are just communicating graphics and touches, I imagine it'll still work in a decade.

And the other car needs to be specifically setup. I'll likely be setting up and account, using some type of QR code scan to sync to the car from said account. And need to do so for every driver of it (it'll probably require me to manage the other drivers even). Also, I am relying on the manufacturer to keep it compatible with newer OS's. I know which one I'm buying.

I imagine they'll have enough walk outs on test drives that they'll reverse the decision soon (not a ton, but enough that corporates notices), then they'll cancel the software and won't maintain it. By 100k miles it won't even work.

Carplay and android auto are common and universal enough I suspect customers will ask and reject it.

I wouldn't, but I can imagine people willingly pay for OnStar.

It doesn't feel as dirty since it isn't just all sitting there. It reaches out to the cellular network. I can imagine people getting decent value for remote start that works in parking garages, and the accident help (people worry).

It doesn't feel like a subscription for a seat heater or super cruise which are both already there.

Practically speaking, maybe not?

If the terms of service that they make you "read" and agree to when you install the app allows this, then they've arguably procured permission, and at that point the criminal justice system bows out -- "it's a civil issue".

Now, using this backdoor access to hack your other internal systems probably isn't covered by what you agreed to, but I would also imagine that most use of these proxies aren't to hack your internal network but just to gain access to new IPs in new countries to bypass rate limits and geofencing (shady, but not inherently criminal)-- and if somebody does try to hack your internal network (or anybody else, but from your IP address), it's the customers of the proxy network doing the crimes, not the providers of the proxy network itself. (Though the proxy network providers might be complicit, so the criminal justice system *might* have something to work with.)