Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Re:Related Links? (Score 1) 50

"Playing along" with a sting operation is dumb, though, if you take acts in furtherance of a criminal conspiracy. You're not a LEO. You don't have immunity. You should simply refuse to take part and instead film the people allegedly goading you into it. You can find a guide to the law on the subject here.

Comment Re:Related Links? (Score -1, Offtopic) 50

Because some people got scammed by /pol into believing that hookers were paid to pee on Obama's bed in Moscow. Which of course the media decides to devote 24-7 coverage to. They've investigated it for months and have yet to produce any corroborating evidence worth a damn, and instead have only managed to inform us of the obvious, that Russia runs RT, America runs PBS and the Brits run the BBC. That said, I will give them credit for nothing that, "Disclosures through WikiLeaks did not contain any evident forgeries" (p. 13).

Meanwhile, good luck finding stories about the DisruptJ20 people who were caught plotting to gas people with butyric acid by pumping it into ventilation shafts. Be sure to read the MSDS on what that stuff is.

Comment Of course not (Score 0) 1

Lots of people who are not at all fans of Trump, but who are experts in the field, have said this is bogus fearmongering. Go read erratasec, or look at what Glenn Greenwald is saying.

When you can only find credulous, partisan hacks like CNN, Huffington Post, Washington Post, etc. pushing this narrative, it's time to wake up and realize that you're being lied to. The evidence is terrible and the excuses are worse. We're supposed to believe that we're being taken over by Russia, but they're never going to give us any evidence because it might compromise a source or method? If that were actually true, what then would be the point of *having* these intelligence departments in the first place?

The real problem is that they've given us the "evidence" they have, complete with ridiculous rumors from hoax documents, and it stinks. They try to talk up their MI6 source, but never mention that nobody could find any worthwhile corroborating evidence for the entire memo after spending months trying. All they've found is proof that the memo has people in completely the wrong countries, meaning their "raw intelligence" is a load of crap.

Worse, they're now talking up protests and the head of the National Guard in DC refused to stay on, he's quitting during the Inauguration and all the Democrats are planning to avoid the area. They're busing in lots of protesters, too. I wouldn't go within a thousand miles of there if I could help it.

Expect shenanigans. The loonies are high strung enough that someone is almost guaranteed to do something stupid. Trump isn't as stupid as he's assumed to be, though. He kept on his private security for a reason. If you're stupid enough to take part in the shenanigans, you'll get exactly what you deserve.

Comment Fear is the mind killer (Score 2) 128

That AC is being dumb about the subsidies--Elon has done far more good with those than most and I cheer for his success. I sincerely wish more of our subsidies were bringing us awesome tech the way the ones going to him are. That said, your post is nonsense too.

Elon is a Trump advisory team member and they've been cooperating together.

But why let facts get in the way here when you can conjure more Russian boogeymen?

Comment I'll be glad when the inauguration mess is over. (Score 0) 732

First, you apparently don't know what I believe. Second, it's really odd that you believe nothing will change when most people against Trump are saying silly things about Nazis, martial law and nuclear annihilation. Third, rationality doesn't work that way. You believe people based on evidence.

That said, can you explain exactly why it's unreasonable to have a low Bayesian prior for P(they're lying) when they've repeatedly lied, even to cause wars, in the past, when they've presented ridiculous and flimsy evidence that was torn apart, and the best they can give us are political hacks and anonymous sources? Or perhaps you can explain why empiricists should believe things without evidence after having been given quite a lot of disproved evidence?

Oh wait, no, you were just building a straw man ... Is Burning Man coming up again? For some reason it feels that way...

Submission + - Did the Russians Really Hack the DNC? 1

MarkBrown151 writes: Russia, we are told, breached the servers of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), swiped emails and other documents, and released them to the public, to alter the outcome of the U.S. presidential election.

How substantial is the evidence backing these assertions?

Hired by the Democratic National Committee to investigate unusual network activity, the security firm Crowdstrike discovered two separate intrusions on DNC servers. Crowdstrike named the two intruders Cozy Bear and Fancy Bear, in an allusion to what it felt were Russian sources. According to Crowdstrike, “Their tradecraft is superb, operational security second to none,” and “both groups were constantly going back into the environment” to change code and methods and switch command and control channels..Source

Comment Papergate intensifies! A4, 8.5x11, or LEGAL? (Score 1) 205

Project much? I'm literally laughing out loud. The only ones who got peed on were CNN & BuzzFeed at that press conference.

I mean, seriously, blank paper? That's your retort? Sorry, I forgot that it was wrong sized blank paper. I can't believe they didn't impeach him for that! Yes, let's now debate the virtues of 8 1/2 x 11 vs. A4 vs. legal. We can then proceed to read Trump's next Twitter typo to the entire world, as if to sum up to the world the bad joke the media has become.

What's this now about taking an L? Could it be that you have your hopes set on one of the other scams? :)

You do remember that Trump takes office in a week... right?

Comment Re:The meme is the message (Score 2) 205

The fact that they've laundered a bad opposition report that has people on the wrong side of the planet in a country they've never visited into "British intelligence" pretty well sums up the modern media and their complete lack of credibility.

But you do have one thing right: I don't listen to the news at all. I pull the actual verifiable facts (if any) out of the news and do my own research.

That can be done really quickly with some sites. You end up with a short list looking like: anonymous sources, anonymous, our past BS story, BuzzFeed, and a random Tweet and that tells you all you needed to know about the article.

Comment Revenge of the nerd virgins (Score 0) 205

Yeah, it's completely hilarious to see people falling for this one.

I just wonder if they're actually going to fall for the next one?

With as many so-called "nerd virgins" as they employ, you'd think they'd be more careful about going on MSNBC to complain about "childless single men who masturbate to anime."

Slashdot Top Deals

Disk crisis, please clean up!

Working...