Do you like their methedology [sic] now that they show clinton winning 72%?
Whoops - "methodology". You are right that I should take the time to spell-check my postings. I blame the parents. Oh, and my spell checker says that "clinton" [sic] should be capitalized.
In any case, I like their methodology regardless of who it predicts, since I am trying to use it to get information about probably outcomes rather than to convince myself that a particular outcome is likely to occur.
Granted, I am generally happier when my preferred outcome is indicated as more likely, but like weather reporting I would prefer accuracy over inaccuracy, even if the forecast is for unpleasant weather.
Besides, my favourite candidate never seems to perform well in these models: