I imagine that had the person just properly reported all of their income like any "legitimate" tutoring service would do, we would not be reading about this at all.
Oh, and not handing their client a USB drive full of evidence of all their other clients probably would help.
Having a society with so much importance placed on "credentialism" and so little importance placed on being able to actually do things doesn't help.
The last mile of a trip seems like the worst place to employ driverless vehicles. You have the most variety of roadways, delivery docks, other staff, so many ways to go bad. Why not focus on interstate driving and take on the long boring stretches that require trucks large enough to sleep in?
It does seem like a business model where human drivers take it from the loading dock to the highway to let it drive itself to the next city where it is met by a local driver to take to to the next loading dock would make a lot of sense. The local drivers could likely keep reasonable working hours (along with the people running the loading/unloading facilities) while the trucks run 24/7 and wait in a big parking lot near the highway.
Then again, spending resources setting up this system and fine tuning it for efficiency, might end up being wasted if a few years down the road (ha! "down the road") the automation is able to do the city driving without issue. Your competitive advantage could be gone in a short time, before you've had the opportunity to profit from the investments you made in the now-out-of-date system.
It's probably easier (and cheaper) to just pay women to have kids and if they don't want to keep them, they would give them to the state orphanage.
I'm not saying this would be a "good" idea, but probably better than full-on enslavement or artificial wombs.
Siberia in Russia, Northern Canada are huge and sparsely populated. Yet there is no migration to these areas. Why? Because current migrant crisis is all about economic migration and not climate migration.
The lack of migration to Siberia and Northern Canada are not persuasive proofs that climate is not a driver of migration - as neither place is particularly friendly in the "local climate" aspects of living there.
Canadahelps.org allows you to donate to any registered Canadian charity, if the charity has not set up a Canadahelps.org charity account, they just mail out a cheque for anything that is donated using the registered charity's registered mailing address.
A crucial difference is that Canadahelps.org is itself a charity, subject that the oversight that entails. I think it is a great value to the charities who use it since it can greatly simplify the charity's accounting and official receipt generation requirements, at the cost of losing out at a closer connection to their doners. From the point of view of a doner, it certainly simplifies things to have a single place to do all your donations, potentially combining multiple tax receipts into just one.
What difference does it make once you put a protective case on it?
Do some people actually use phones without cases? How can you do that unless you live in a rubber room?
Some people do not use a phone case. The monsters.
Well, an even bigger issue is that many times people send you a word-like document when a txt file would suffice.
Or even just include the information in the plain text of the email message.
"See attached document for the time and place of the meeting."
Why would you use Klarna in the first place? The whole buy-now/pay-later movement is extortion and daylight robbery.
If you have enough money - buy it. If you don't have enough money - don't buy it.
Simple as that. Mortgage being the only exception.
Our society needs financial education, teaching how to resist the "you must have X now" marketing and learning that you should save up for things you like rather than using credit.
Our society also needs a bit less economic disparity. Maybe going back to a minimum wage of $12.50 per hour like it was in 1968 (inflation adjusted) would be a good idea.
Since the amount is (according to you) not significant to Musk, he should turn down any contracts here to avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest.
Something tells me he won't.
President Biden sent well over one-hundred billion of taxpayer money to the very country that hires dishonorably discharged cokeheads to serve on executive energy boards.
Coincidentally enough, that cokeheads name was also Biden.
Spare me the fucking 'conflict of interest' bullshit.
"Because I perceive this one example of a conflict of interest, this other conflict of interest is not important."
Is that really your position?
Maybe a better position would be "I think the everyone should be bound by conflict of interest legislation that is effective." or "I will not support anyone's conflict of interest actions."
BTW, didn't the Republican-led congressional inquiries into Biden wrongdoings in this area lead to nothing? When the political opponents can't find much to pin on somene, maybe there isn't much to find.
My problem with it is basic math: it presupposes that every generation will be larger and more affluent than the previous one.
As a society, we are getting richer collectively - just not necessarily on an individual basis. Our overall productivity has been increasing for a LONG time. We have enough resources and are going to have even more in the future, we just have not decided on a system to distribute it equitably.
Each generation is collectively more affluent than the previous one, its just that each generation concentrates that affluence more and more into a smaller fraction of the whole.
To be fair, MOST of the money spent in "foreign military assistance" is money spent on local arms suppliers, and works to keep the USA military equipment up to date and fresh and to keep the USA military industry humming along and benefiting from economics of scale.
Like the "poor folks food aid" (both foreign and domestic) is mostly subsidies to the American agricultural sector, foreign military aid is mostly subsidies to the American defence sector.
Wind + solar matching hydro isn't what I'd call being dwarfed. Seems like a great milestone really.
I was thinking the same thing. Wind+solar seemed to actually be a tiny bit more than hydro.
A third of a billion people might agree with you. About 7.8 billion people don't feel that way. Are there no good wordworkers in that group.
I don't doubt that YOU prefer non-SI measurements, and feel that it works well, but you should not deny that A LOT of other people seem to be doing OK with SI, and that perhaps your minority opinion might not be so well grounded as it feels like it is.
You lean on “better” like it’s objective, but it’s not. It’s your value call: less CO2, quieter streets....shoved on everyone via state power. I say let people decide what matters to them, cost, range, whatever. If EVs can’t stand on their own, maybe they’re not as great as you think.
Well, individual choice on externalities like CO2 and noise do not really work that way. If I don't want you to pollute, the only way I can really influence your behaviour is to convince enough people to support public policies that make you not pollute, or at least discourage you from doing so. So, when enough people value clean air and quieter streets, they hopefully manage to make it more costly anyone to pollute it.
In this particular case, it looks like the new ICE numbers in total are falling from a peak in 2018, which seems pretty surprising to me. Perhaps those EV's a greater than many think.
I have yet to see any problem, however complicated, which, when you looked at it in the right way, did not become still more complicated. -- Poul Anderson
