They're not "squishy science", they're the factors that actually have thr most influence on whether someone turns criminal or not at that economic level.

They the actual science.

Going for the blank numbers instead without understanding model or context is the true squishy science.

Or do you actually suggest that the amount on melanin in someone's skin is somehow a mechanism that drives crime?

What happens when you normalize not for skin color, but, say, for income, parents income, access to education etc?

"It's my grandma"s biryhday."

Type your wipe pin on a label and glue it on the back of your phone. "Hide" it in a very obvious, idiotic way, e.g. below the shock absorbing cover.

Or be particularly "smart" about it, scratch it into the cover.

Some wannabe hacker law enforcement idiot sooner or later is bound to try it out.

Not your fault they've destroyed evidence.

Are you suggesting that Alzheimerâ(TM)s is sexually transmitted?

I'm old enough to recall the olden time - two years ago - when the hiring had slowed because there were fears (that had gone nowhere, just muted) that US economy is overheated and about to enter a recession.

But I guess the underlying conditions for recession are harder to spot, when the economic data are dominated by inflation (gas prices) and inflation (AI bubble).

Not sure why that's necessary. The nukes had the ability to destroy the planet several (dozens of) times over.

Calculating fissile matetial decay seems like a straight-forward task to be done on the back of an envelope.

What else could possibly have changed?

If your internet is just a better TV to you, enabling you only to consume what giants think you should, then yes, you're right.

If you perceive the internet to be a truly democratic mass-medium, where symmetry between sender and receiver is built-in, and everyone can be a sender, not just a receiver... then no. You're not right.

Ah, so your take is that those truly and generationally fucked don't complain loudly enough?

Amen to that.

Oh ho ho⦠you sweet summer child. Daaaaw, look at you with your little APIâ(TM)s, a few desktops, a server thinking this. Itâ(TM)s just so⦠so KYOOOOOT! You. Are. Adorbs.

Pro tip tho? Try working for a very big organization and understanding that delivered software such as this isnâ(TM)t going anywhere anytime soon, and is definitely not obsolete.

RF control drones are nowhere near dead. Even DJI Mavics are still used daily for recon missions, nothing beats their combination of price to video quality.

This is a love tap, fists will be thrown later. One thing can and should be done, we need to start adding aerosols into the atmosphere, the higher the better. Adding Na compounds to jet fuels would introduce just enough aerosols in order to start reflecting a tiny amount more of solar radiation than what makes it to the surface of the planet. 1-2% reflection is all we need to start reducing the temperatures. Of-course we will have to keep doing it until we figure out a more permanent solution.

This problem needs to be solved by references, ask AI, people, is this program safe before installing.

Google is now adding more rules to make sideloading more difficult while Apple never provided a way to sideload an app in the first place. People need to be able to build and load their own apps without permission from the OS manufacturer, a phone is a computer with specialized hardware, we do have ability to build and run apps on our own hardware.

Depends on the direction. It's not that clear cut.

To demonstrate, simple question: who benefits?

Hint: it's not mis-educated kids, it's a class of incredible wealth and power.