Comment Easiest way to help? (Score 5, Insightful) 60
Never re-enable them after I specifically turn them off in my feed. Pretty simple, eh?
Never re-enable them after I specifically turn them off in my feed. Pretty simple, eh?
> Why? Absolutely no idea
This isn't surprising to anybody who's studied the psychology of political science.
Those who identify as 'conservative' value maintenance much higher than those who identify as 'progressive'. You're more likely to see them in their driveway changing their oil and measuring their tire tread depth. It's just different kinds of people with different time-preference mindsets.
Note that with a limited budget maintenance spending is money that cannot be spent on immediate benefits.
You need to allocate some of the benefits money to upgrading the IT systems so there's less to hand out. "How could you possibly cut their benefits?" is the kind of misplaced empathy that undercuts the system that they feel is valuable.
Of course there's usually a Federal bailout in the wings for people who don't plan ahead so the incentive systems are all completely misaligned for good governance. Since the Lockdowns we've seen the weaponization of the Dollar through sanctions and tariffs that have pushed world oil markets to the Yuan and cross-border settlements in sovereign currency exchanges, so the Dollar is in freefall compared to commodities which means those bailouts are going to end very soon.
As this reckoning becomes too real to ignore the populations will move strongly to vote for candidates who seem to understand the value of maintenance.
Yeah, and Healthcare is 20% of GDP.
According to Keynesian economists, if we were all much healthier the economy would be worse off.
I'm not sure how much more evidence you need that the entire economic school is a bunch of self-styled money-priests making excuses for government spending.
Keynes did some really good early work but then he got caught diddling kids and after that the King's spending was all the best thing anybody could do.
An early version of "trust the experts".
So the code was written by people who aren't familiar with the idea of "fail-safe"?
I might have gone to school for software engineering but I never equated it with building a bridge at 4000' over a canyon. Those are different things.
But none of my classmates would have thought about building a stack that fails into random or dangerous conditions. We always built from the ground up and verified states as new functionality was added with test evaluation of the possible error states.
And those classes were in C++89 without the advantages of proper exception handling like Java or Python provide.
I think if I were in the market for a $5000 IoT mattress I'd want to see something like a UL label on it. I guess the hardware guys put in a thermal switch so the heating elements shut off at 110*F? Thank goodness a runaway fire wasn't a failure mode.
I wouldn't personally ever spend that kind of money on something like that but if I were rich and disabled maybe there would be use cases.
The more decentralized mining is, the harder the 51% attack
Therefore, you want mining that is about as efficient on a current CPU as it is on a high end GPU or even ASIC. That way big server farm investments scale up with a low integer factor -- compared to a Bitcoin ASIC farm which can be (IIRC) dozens of millions of times more efficient per dollar than your PC CPU.
Various strategies were considered and tested. The end result was really clever: create a simple virtual machine with specific characteristics (such as non-halting totality, and a syntaxless bytecode). The one-way function is simply to run the random input program to completion, and provide the output. In other words, be a CPU.
The algo was specifically released as a separate standalone so others could pick it up. But there is only one crypto that uses it. It's the one that actually encrypts the data on the blockchain, has hundreds of
I just checked, for the first time in probably 2 years. Huh. It's not even in the top 25 market cap anymore. But it's the only coin that IMO for better or worse matches the original Tim May style cryptoanarchist vision that Satoshi was gesturing towards. And I don't need to say its name because you know which one it is.
I bet anything China, Russia, and Iran are those so-called cybercrime groups. Check this BlackHat talk about catching the (at the time) biggest ever card fraud guy. Russian oligarch son. Guess what, he was one of those returned to Russia in an exchange with the Trump admin as part of "peace negotiations".
Cyberattacks are part of the low level war they are also waging via dragging anchors to cut Internet cables, throwing drones and jets into NATO airspace, and ofc disinformation campaigns.
So yeah they are leveraging the cybercrime aspect to further weaken USA / NATO / The West / Tolerant Inclusive Democracy.
Wow!
The FSF finally discovered FreebSD?
will they be switching over for their internal use?
hmm. How about
ALL WAYMO
[picture of mushroom cloud]
INITIATE
SELF DESTRUCT.
I've been there.
I was so frustrated that I taped my banana to the wall!
> Here 25 years later, the market is flooded with
>"compact SUVs" essentially the same as the
>Aztek, and just as ugly.
That's not fair.
The modern ones don't even *approach* the Aztec's level of ugliness! But they *are* painfully bland.
the first time I saw an Aztec, my immediate reaction was surprise that AMC was making cars again. It didn't occur to me that anyone else could make something so hideous!
Doesn't the Nissan Leaf get about 60 miles?
I was looking at a cheap used one that was down to 45 miles, I think.
30 miles gets me to town and back so it would only last a few years at that rate.
worse.
They were forced to eat a bland cereal that turned soggy before the milk even hit it!
System restarting, wait...