Comment Re:Technical Problems... (Score 1) 345
The state could drive away that whole industry with a tax like this.
One might be left with the impression that this is the goal.
The state could drive away that whole industry with a tax like this.
One might be left with the impression that this is the goal.
I hope you find something good soon.
There are two issues I have with Ceph:
1) management complexity. Proxmox is pretty easy to manage, very little to surprised a seasoned admin. Ceph, while easy to implement, can be deceptively difficult to administrate if something goes sideways. I usually recommend small businesses avoid it if at all possible.
2) SANs are often faster. Ceph has enough overhead to be noticable.
That said, it is a very nice feature and well worth learning how to administrate if you're already a linux admin. If you are going to use ceph, I highly stress at least a dedicated 10g network JUST for ceph.
| And they get to do it because the FTC has been totally defanged. It has nothing to do with Trump or oil. Sheeple indeed.
In March 2025, Mr. Trump fired the two remaining Democratic commissioners of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), Alvaro Bedoya and Rebecca Kelly Slaughter, basically consolidating executive control over the agency. This action effectively ended the agency’s longstanding statutory and bipartisan independence.
So, basically, Mr. Trump defanged the FTC. Who's the sheeple now?
Depending on the study, from 30% to 44% of Vietnam vets came back with PTSD. The stereotype of the unhinged 'Nam vet was thus not just a leftist conspiracy. Today, Vietnam-era veterans remain disproportionately represented in the homeless population.
If we have a draft today the level of resistance will cripple the country. Nobody will tolerate the Government pulling that. That move could break the country.
We are obligated to ignore stupid laws. To mock them, to flaunt them and ultimately get them removed.
We are not sheep.
We've come full circle to the tech community deciding what's proper for our neighbors. ChatGPT is free to decide not to include adult stuff, and celebrity/CSAM should totally be illegal, but "The proper use of AI is as a tool, not as a friend, lover or therapist, and especially not as an addiction" is how we get the government regulating how adults use the tools at their disposal.
Aside from CSAM and defamatory stuff we don't have the right to decide what's proper for someone else.
Eventually peer to peer training (Petals using Hivemind, etc.) will lead the way.
At least they didn't do a Tumblr and have the feature put in, then wait for millions to be using it... and then yank the rug out from under them.
We saw how that ended.
Fortunately there are alternatives.
Everyone's (rightfully) bitching about this, and I agree, but none of that solves the problem.
What's the alternative? Give me a TV brand that gives you, ideally, a dumb TV, but alternatively a decent smart TV that is easy to work with.
Responsiveness is an important, and often overlooked, characteristic. It's important.
Brand/model recommendations; go!
The bots are the most interesting part of reddit. It's fascinating to me what foreign actors want us thinking or believing.
It's not like the organic reddit content has any value. This will be like the time onlyfans pretended they were going to get rid of porn.
Since when has "Free speech on the platform" been a consideration for either Alphabet OR Meta?
You think they'll take the loss out of the goodness of their hearts? Absolute bullshit; at most they'll shuffle the numbers around so it's hard to trace how it's being passed on to the consumer or local community.
Remember when "Think of the children" was a phrase which was rightly mocked as manipulative and only fooled the smoothest of the smooth brains who couldn't think beyond their emotional reaction?
Now it's a battle cry that suckers in millions.
The Founding Fathers made a slave country where women, minorities and non-landowners couldn't vote. We already changed what the founding slaveowners made.
Faith may be defined briefly as an illogical belief in the occurence of the improbable. - H. L. Mencken