Comment Re:"Focused on Discovery" (Score 1) 17
When I hear this nonsense it enrages me and I want to shoot them in the face.
I just want to shoot them in the face, period.
When I hear this nonsense it enrages me and I want to shoot them in the face.
I just want to shoot them in the face, period.
We need to ask "How can we design programming languages, system APIs, application structure, data structures and database schemas so that it is a lot less likely to make a mistake in logic, modularity, data flow or data design?"
"How can we design a (programming) language in which it's impossible for people to think bad thoughts" has been a wished-for silver bullet since at least the 1960s. This is why the industry uses SAST(ools), dynamic analysis, AI analysis, etc on whatever they've currently got, because after sixty years of not being able to produce this silver bullet people have accepted that you need to try something else.
Some people in Europe complain about the "rules based order," but they fall in line behind America.
Let me guess, you're related to, or possibly are, this guy?
If you want to understand international politics right now, it's the US led world in favor of Pax Americana
That may have been the case until about 20-30 years ago, but now it's most of the world wanting rules-based order up against an increasingly isolationist US led, if you can call it that, by a rapidly dementing authoritarian. The position "leader of the free world" has been vacant for at least 20 years.
Put not your trust in money, but put your money in trust.