Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Darwin (Score -1) 99

You know every extinct species that existed before us, from the dodo-bird to the tyrannosaurus .. they all were wiped out by some catastrophic event such as a meteor or some other more capable and adapted species outcompeting them. Humans on the other hand, will be discovered by some future actual-intelligent species .. likely some descendent of cockroaches, if not an alien race, as the one species in the entire galaxy who self-annihilated themselves -- and that too over stupid shit. The only thing that might prevent the nature of our demise being the laughingstock is that it would be considered too far fetched and ridiculous to be true.

Comment Local AI (Score 5, Interesting) 125

They want to squish competition. They don't want you running models locally. That's all the is. Classic play when a company gets big they start asking government to put in regulations so that small players have to go through mountains of paperwork and make their investors afraid due to all the uncertainty. How do you think the pharmaceuticals ground innovation to a halt by using the FDA as a battering ram? It costs $2 billion to do a clinical trial in the US .. nobody's going to invest that much on any crazy ideas. The EPA does the same. It's all a racket.

Comment VR requirements (Score 0) 62

VR is guaranteed flop unless they can make a headset under 100 grams, 4K per eye, and 120 fps. If it can't be done, VR can't be done. If the laws of physics prevent it, the laws of physics prevent VR. Even Meta's future headset, Phoenix, may flop because although it is (supposedly) 75 grams it will likely be a mere 2.5K and only achieve 90 fps. Of course when it fails they will claim the VR concept itself isn't wanted by consumers rather than blame their stupid implementation. Don't even attempt to make a VR headset if your concept can't do a minimum of 4K per eye (ideally 8K per eye @ 120 degree FoV) and 100 grams (ideally 50 or less -- normal sunglasses weigh 20 grams) and 120 fps.

Comment Re:Recently purchased a Tesla. (Score 1) 122

I've had one for some time, but literally NOBODY believes how well it works .. not until a test drive or two. I'm surprised a bunch of idiots didn't reply you saying "omg, its not really driving itself .. you're supervising it" ..or that you're intervening but your brain deletes it from your memory. Slashdot luddites in particular are adamant that cars can never drive themselves -- there are too many "variables".

Comment "Regulation" (Score 4, Interesting) 118

They are calling for regulation because they want to protect their own monopoly and block new entrants. They must fear the open models or something. We know the pharmaceuticals played the same game such that it's impossible for a startup to develop and bring to market a new drug without the "help" of a giant existing player. In the case of pharmaceuticals the $2 billion per approval price tag virtually guarantees no paradigm shifting ideas will receive funding due to fear of it failing in late stage clinical trial.

Established AI companies want to block open, domain specific, or models created via distillation from joining the party. They want to be sure no more AI companies can emerge, the only way to make certain of that is with a mountain of government regulation and uncertainty.

Slashdot Top Deals

Mathematics is the only science where one never knows what one is talking about nor whether what is said is true. -- Russell

Working...