Comment Re: They cited the wrong author (Score 1) 44
You think that's baffling, what about all of the people who voted for Trump twice, after they already knew he fucks kids?
You think that's baffling, what about all of the people who voted for Trump twice, after they already knew he fucks kids?
It's probably a combination of evil recruiters who don't care about you and even more evil recruiters posting fake jobs in order to collect statistics about the postings...
The law decides who can record what and in some states the bank can record video but not audio.
What if a global entity could retain all the wit, mannerisms, and the most beautiful prose and descriptions, and tell the story the way the author would
What if I could wave a wand and a book would magically appear before me, perfect in every way? They're about equally likely.
Go read what they actually wrote about their products and competition.
Facts are facts whether they make the party YOU like look like the shit it is or not, whether they make YOU look like an idiot or not. And it is shit, and you are an idiot. I shared only facts and you cried about them being partisan BECAUSE of your idiocy, which is itself partisan because you are only crying about this fact because it makes conservatives look like the shit they are.
Every piece of shit who belongs to a shit party never stops crying about how things are partisan. Fuck your disingenuous tears.
"The USA is at the apex of its power."
HahaahahahahhahahhahahHhahahahahHBahhah
Do you ever stop proving you're illiterate?
Lol such self defeating clowns around here. You will sabotage yourselves to the bitter end.
These companies keep making public statements about how they are making it better and more powerful to benefit their customers, so yes it certainly does. Every public statement they make is relevant. That's how everything works, not just corporations.
How about that it doesn't do what they say it does so they should get on that? Amazing how perspective changes everything.
Except for all of their public statements about ongoing development which completely destroy that argument, sure.
No one who still calls people "retarded" has anything worth hearing to say.
Your comment is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of how things actually work yet you're insulting others.
If someone in this discussion has a disability, it's your inability to not be shit.
AIs are good at predicting stuff, but that's relatively good, not absolutely.
What they aren't good at is consistency, which breaks from everything else we do with computers.
This both means they can achieve new things and can fail in new ways.
With our current approach (replacing intuition with random numbers) AI can literally never be reliable.
Cuckservatives always mischaracterize capitalism because that's part of how they oppress others. If the people understood how they were getting fucked and that the system is literally designed to enable that, they would revolt. So they can never tolerate you describing it accurately.
We're living in a golden age. All you need is gold. -- D.W. Robertson.