Sounds like the precise argument why governments shouldn't be the ones regulating these things. Maybe private industry consortiums
"These things"? You mean the government shouldn't be drafting regulations for government, which is what we're talking about here? Instead, private industry should be telling the government what to do?
No, but HPE is. HPE does not sell printer ink.
> Meta doesn't really know how to do anything else with any skill.
They don't know how to do Facebook very well either: it's been pretty much stagnant and enshittified to death for the past 22 years, and it feels like a forum for greying people whose greying friends haven't bothered to move on either, or to get the date of the next annual meeting of the bridge club.
one of those companies whose sole purpose seems to be annoying you by slapping their name as a watermark on a generic image you'd like to use in a meme, and force to spend 10 seconds finding somewhere else because you were never going to pay a stupid company to remove their mark on a bad picture you can find everywhere.
I wonder how those companies still exist, let alone make any money.
Anyway, the modern way to use copyrighted photos for free is to ask stable diffusion to regenerate it, because the AI companies have done all the data stealing for you and repackaged the stolen data into "models" you can use for free.
Failing that, stroke something else.
and given what a fascist kind of psychoses those are, that is rather bad news.
I think: nothing.
So again: why is it so terrible to have a registry for knowing which person is associated with a telephone number?
What are your use-cases of using a phone where that knowledge would affect you negatively?
Hmm. Just from my own bullshit experience, if you find yourself in an empty room, you probably look to the right and then, naturally, you're moving counterclockwise.
... ANY internet access.
Of course just to protect the children. That all internet access will then be linked to the user personally is just an unavoidable side-effect.
But we need to think of the children!
Registering your ID with your number is totally unacceptable - why?
Wow I guess someone had to miss him; I thought he was ridiculously overrated myself and didn't care for a lot of his design work over the years.
If you need Ive back in your life, you could check out the new Ferrari
At least on my systems you need to be root do to anything with nf_tables. Is this some distro specific permission stupidity?
Maybe. There's a feature called user namespaces in Linux that effectively allows an unprivileged user to act as if they were a privileged user within a specific environment. (Basically, containerization.) Within such a namespace, a non-privileged user could conceptually access nf_tables as if they were a privileged user. In theory this would only allow them to add additional filters within the namespace, but the vulnerability here can provide direct access to kernel memory.
Some distros add additional layers of security to prevent flaws like that, blocking access to nf_tables even within a namespace, but the vulnerability links to ways around those. (Link to the Wayback Machine from the source vulnerability disclosure.)
It's possible your distro may be secure - or it may not be. It depends on what features are enabled.
Only the sender and recipient have they keys to decrypt the messages on device; Apple does not.
Which is great, when they're in transit. But once they're on-device, they're decrypted, and then Apple has access to them.
We know this, because there have been court cases where iCloud-subpeonaed iMessage messages were presented as evidence.
Just because the transit is secure, doesn't mean the endpoints are.
It makes sense that a long-lived species would take longer to develop
So then what is the point of Yoda being immensely old? Is he basically 63 in Yoda years?
I do not fear computers. I fear the lack of them. -- Isaac Asimov
