You said the word, pack, which explains why there often aren't enough sensors. EV batteries are mostly laid out in series-parallel configuration and made of many cells, and the intelligence on the health of individual cells is poor in most cases.

Volvo is Chinese with a design house in Sweden

I can't imagine anyone not understanding that their right to exist is based in part upon that belief, because otherwise they have been willfully aiding and abetting mass copyright infringement.

The moment you start charging for access, it's no longer open in the traditional sense.

It may be free as in freedom, but you cannot exercise that freedom unless you pay up?

We'll end up with a bunch of Mozillas trying to maximize ~shareholder~ community value.

Talk about a money shot. If Anthropic argues that this use doesn't wash away restrictions, then they're also arguing that their software is illegal. Shades of copyleft.

If they have a smoking gun? Sure. And the SEC will want in, too. Otherwise? GLWT

Humans have flaws. Taxi drivers sometimes commit crimes. Nothing I will say here is meant to imply that humans are perfect. But they can at least be trusted to do something predictable most of the time. A computer cannot, so you can't trust it on its OR even as much as a human. But you also can't trust central management. QED, you simply cannot ever trust an autonomous taxi.

Finding ways to replace human work is the backbone of progress, but sometimes replacing a human is not actually a good idea.

Yes, defending victims is a famously arrogant activity.

Still probably true BTW, though ironically my example is the opposite. I bought a pair of issue desert boots and a paid of issue arctic boots at the same time. The arctic boots came with two sets of liners, were flawless, I still have them. The desert boots came apart on like the second wear, which sadly was long after I bought them. They disintegrated at a seam.

Sigh. I meant to write more there that would make that comment make more sense as a reply to your comment.

Anyway... why not just tampered with clones? Fix your defects, with a broad definition of "defect"

This story is about clones.

The word "Clones" appears in the headline, summary, and article.

Immunology, presumably.

The only donor bodies that aren't going to treat the transplant as an act of war are clones or heavily immunosuppressed; and it's probably more plausible to assume that you'll be able to clone a human like a sheep than assume that you'll be making some fundamental breakthroughs in immunology to deal more elegantly with unmatched hosts.

I can see the utility of having spare organs in certain emergencies; but how much life extension would you actually get even if the sort of neurosurgery involved in removing a brain and reattaching it to a new host's spinal cord were viable? Is the theory that the assorted ghastly flavors of neurodegeneration are actually to be blamed on older organs and everything will be fine; or is this just a very expensive way to ensure that you skip the various ways peripheral organs can kill you and are assured to be the spryest patient in the dementia ward?

You can't even see that the summary says the so-called age verification is being done with ID verification and you want to tell me I'm missing something? Pure clown shit that EVERYONE BUT YOU figured out.

But what if I need a piece of brain? Abby what, you say?