Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Yep (Score 1) 185

My sentiment, too. However there are some tweaks and extensions to make to your proposal:
- Legalise all 'recreational drugs' but tax them according to the cost to society (this must include nicotine, alcohol and even NOx, too.) The tax levied should compensate for medical costs (such as for OD treatment), damages, cost of policing/monitoring the chains of production, quality control, education, other prevention measures etc.
- Make production of drugs something you have to get a license for. Preferably, the pharmaceutical industry is offered the chance to produce recreational drugs but only if they produce enough new types of medical drugs each year or risk losing their 'right to produce'. In the startup phase, make hunting drug shipments a priority with bonusses for police/border patrol that intercept drugs and then refine the drugs and sell them as government. Competing with drug cartels using their own drugs will quickly dissuade them from trying to smuggling drugs in.
- If you commit a crime or cause an accident while under the influence of anything that impairs cognition, reaction time etc., you are treated as fully culpable with aggravated punishment.
- If you want to buy drugs, you have to pass a test on the effects and risks of the drug. This will give you a right to buy (for instance using a creditcard like pass with your fingerprint) a limited amount of that drug per time period (to limit redistribution and use, yes this will cause an issue for heavy drinkers and use in social settings such as bars. That is fine with me.)

All in all, the bizarre part of all of this is (and has been for as long as drugs have been illegal) is that conservatives want /less/ control by the government but want to deny a large part of the population their right to make decisions about their own life. Yearly, lots of people die doing 'recreational things' like driving motor cycles, jumping parachute, climbing (or even just walking in the) mountains, skiing, diving, etc. etc. etc. and a proposal to get those banned or heavily regulated wouldn't even pass the first discussion. So why are 'drugs' different? There is no real reason. It is, as you say, mostly driven by ulterior motives that don't relate to the substances themselves at all. Oh well, a person can dream.

Comment Re:Take a cue from human learning? (Score 1) 61

Indeed, let's wait and see. For now, even though the mechanism underneath may be unclear, I don't see proof of a more complex mechanism at work. Many complex human cognitive skills (Chess, Go, visual recognition, language recognition, etc.) have been replicated with machines to a varying degree and I dare wager that all of them will be at some point in time with nothing more than 'neural networks'. If some quantum effect or other esotheric mechanism is indeed involved in memory storage, I doubt it will change the working of these cognitive parts of the equation. On the other hand, I don't expect such networks to become 'aware' so yes, I think there is more to human minds than just neural network capacity :).

Comment Take a cue from human learning? (Score 2) 61

Humans make the same mistake when the visual differences are confusing or contradictory and we avoid them usually because our way of judging is based on the way we learn in the first place: large features first, only considering finer details if further classification is needed or if the larger features give too little information. Visual tricks that play into this can confuse humans even where they may not confuse AI.

Examples: sometimes it is hard to see if someone is male or female. We then call that person androgyn but factually it is a failure of our classification system. Some forms of optical illusions are the same: they deliberately take advantage of the way people (fail to) discern between 'objects'.

I think it is time to admit that our brains aren't too special. They really are nothing more than weighted networks that take inputs filter them and classify them. Ideas may be nothing more than a way for the brain to code and store the results. If that is true, then the 'human advantage' may be in that specific area: the greater ability to store and use these results as further input.

Submission + - Crashed Tesla won't release dead driver

geschild writes: Dutch Firemen requested a Tesla engineer on-site to assist and prevent electrocution while recovering the deceased driver of a crashed Tesla S. It is unclear if the 53-year old local man driving the vehicle had auto-pilot enabled when it crashed into a tree at high speed, ejecting part of the battery pack onto the road before ending up in the woods next to the road. The ejected battery caused a difficult to extinguish chemical fire on the road that was finally put out using soil. The Dutch national broadcasting company NOS has further details.

Comment Re:Higgs "hate" because the discovery is meaningle (Score 1) 205

In reality, there is of course only a percentual difference between having everything be nothing or 'nearly' nothing if you look at atoms as being mostly empty anyway.

My 'Whoa. Déjà vu" was actually a smart ass reference to The Matrix because if everything is essentially non-existant, then what is the difference between our reality and a virtual reality simulation.

Cool stuff!

Submission + - New results indicate that particle discovered at CERN is a Higgs boson (web.cern.ch)

An anonymous reader writes: Geneva, 14 March 2013. At the Moriond Conference today, the ATLAS and CMS collaborations at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider (LHC) presented preliminary new results that further elucidate the particle discovered last year. Having analysed two and a half times more data than was available for the discovery announcement in July, they find that the new particle is looking more and more like a Higgs boson, the particle linked to the mechanism that gives mass to elementary particles. It remains an open question, however, whether this is the Higgs boson of the Standard Model of particle physics, or possibly the lightest of several bosons predicted in some theories that go beyond the Standard Model. Finding the answer to this question will take time.

Comment 3.96$ a month... (Score 3, Interesting) 273

... is pretty cheap (5$ is for a family account). But as BB itself says, you can only upload 2 to 4 GB per day.

They should be making a mint on that service! They use home-brew storage pods and are very open about it, too!
http://blog.backblaze.com/2011/07/20/petabytes-on-a-budget-v2-0revealing-more-secrets/

Anyway, be careful to read all the gotchas:
http://www.backblaze.com/remote-backup-everything.html (hint: 'everything' for a certain definition of everything. No virtual machines, ISO's and NAS storage by default.)
http://www.backblaze.com/internet-backup.html (hint: not all OSes are treated equally.)

(Full disclosure: I work for a storage manufacturer that sells de-duping storage so I think I understand their cost model a bit better than most.)

Slashdot Top Deals

Single tasking: Just Say No.

Working...