Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: Power imbalance (Score 1) 31

Bear in mind that this woman, while she is undoubtedly right about everything about Facebook's issues, almost certainly joined Facebook at the urging of, and as an asset of, NZSIS. Her background reeks worse than a CNN news analyst's.

Even on the freak occurrence that someone with that background decided to join Facebook for pure idealistic reasons wholly unrelated to their FPINT past (which she would have you believe), I can guarantee you that if I think she's a spook, Facebook thought so too. She was allowed into the powerful position she got because Facebook wanted a cozy relationship to another five eyes bigwig.

So yes, listen to what she says about Facebook, but don't assume the power imbalance is in Facebook's favor!

Comment Re: fraidy cats (Score 1) 41

There's a rule: secrecy in negotiations always benefit the few.

The reason is that if you're a negotiator representing few people (such as say a CEO or a board of directors) then secrecy won't stop you from keeping your bosses informed about what you and your fellow negotiators are doing. You can't sell out your bosses, they'll find out through the other negotiators. You're on a tight leash.

But if you represent a large group of people, such as the rank and file members of a union, or the public at large, then secrecy prevents you from keeping them in the loop. If you're offered a deal which benefits you but screws over the people you represent, secrecy ensures you can safely take it.

Comment Spurious (Score 3, Insightful) 84

Gee, what is more likely? That sweeteners harm your brain, but stop doing it after 60, or that maybe working age people with the very highest levels of sweetener consumption have some other characteristic in common which might influence it?

So many health studies of the British newspaper variety don't even try to make a causal argument.

Comment Re: Everyone knows... (Score 2) 173

Giving Palestinians the same sort of agency as Israelis is perverse. Hamas is supported by Netanyahu, he's explicitly defended sending money to them as a strategy to divide and conquer and to reduce the risk of foreign sympathy.

(Foreign sympathy for Palestinians he sees as a threat to Israel. Terrorism, obviously not.)

There's one side which has all the power, all the freedom, all the choices in Israel-Palestine. Now that the genocide is getting completed, it's time for people like you to stop both-sidesing and admit that the critics who said this was a genocidal colonial project, aren't just right just now. They were right all along.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Plan to throw one away. You will anyway." - Fred Brooks, "The Mythical Man Month"

Working...