Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Illegal search applies here (Score 1) 202

A previous administration attempted to force asylum seekers to wait their turn for a hearing outside the country.

This is pretty much the same in every country, and for those that didn't have those rules - well you can see how well that's worked out.

Per the the 1951 Refugee Convention and later 1967 amendment which the US is a signatory to refugees have the rights to:

* not be expelled without due process

* not get punished for irregular entry

* gainful employment

* freedom of movement within the country

* access to the justice system

* be issued travel documents

Remain in Mexico and other restrictions on the entry of refugees and asylum seekers is illegal. Trying to get around and curtail these rights is why there are all these murderous campaigns in UK, Italy, and the US to turn around or sink boats in international waters before they gain land and get access to refugee protections. It's also why the US is working with Panama to make the Darién gap crossing more deadly to detain those that survive. If they never make it to the US, or die in the Arizona high desert because they were forced away from safer crossing spots, then they can't claim asylum.

It's a disgusting practice that is by no means unique to Trump or the US, although he's making things significantly worse.

Comment Re:oh I've heard of that (Score 2) 52

It's not just white paint. Being highly reflective is only 1/2 the equation. There are certain materials with extremely high IR emmissivity which will actively cool the structure they are applied to. Not only that, but it must be a frequency of IR that the atmosphere is transparent to. Whether such coatings are ready for widespread use is up in the air.

This guy has several videos about trying to homebrew such a coating Making Infrared Cooling Paint From Grocery Store Items (w/Novel CaCO Microsphere Synthesis)

Comment Re:Complete failure all around (Score 1) 140

The court should have forced the ex to disband the family group.

You can't always disband a family group successfully. I know, because I've tried. I switched from Apple to Android, so I wanted to make my wife the admin. There is no way for me to elevate her, so we had to create a new family with her as the admin. Except I can't simply disband my family because my son is under 13. Once a minor's account is associated with a family, they must remain in some family until they age out. Until I have 0 minors in my family group, I can't disband it.

So the proscribed solution is for her to invite the kids to her new family group, which is supposed to send a message to me, which I then approve. Except I no longer have an apple device. It won't let you do this through a website, supposedly the notification shows up in the "family" tab of the settings app for some ungodly reason. I tried signing onto my AppleID through my work laptop, but the notification doesn't show up there. Thinking maybe it has to do with corporate endpoint security crap, I tried reviving my old iphone 6 but I get no notification there either, maybe because it is no longer active on my carrier?

Anyways, I've found no solution. Apple's software is just shit

Comment Re: ...And you'll like it (Score 2) 239

A human running over a kid due to negligence and going to jail for manslaughter vs a company paying a $1M dollar fine is not the same. Companies get to defray legal responsibilities in ways that people can't and generally have far greater financial resources. Therefore they can afford to be far more negligent as long as they can still make a profit.

Comment Misleading premise (Score 2) 61

It's not like we lost something here. Before AWS and other cloud providers came along, it was simply impossible to stand up a global video conferencing network without a massive capex and ongoing maintenance costs if you weren't already a telco or backbone internet provider.

If all Signal wanted to do was exchange text coms with occasional images, they could still rent a handful of colo racks and be in pretty good shape.

Complaining about limited options to source a global multimedia streaming network solution is like complaining about limited options for contractors to put a satellite in orbit. Well yeah, it's a niche expensive service with huge startup costs. The fact that you can buy such a service at all is pretty amazing.

Comment Re:Reality (Score 2) 237

Everything that comes out of the president's mouth is not law. He is not a king. If he doesn't have the statutory nor constitutional authority to legally name it, then "Gulf of America" is not a legal name, and encyclopedias should continue to use the consensus name it has gone by for the last couple hundred years with maybe a foot note RE the Trump idiocy.

Comment Re:Mount Doane (Score 3, Insightful) 43

Naming things after people is never so much a celebration as it is about notability.

If it were just about historical notability, then little towns would have a streets named after Lenin, Mao, Genghis Kahn, Hitler, Tang Taizong, Galileo, Gandhi, Sitting Bull, etc. with the same frequency that they have "Washington St."

It's about honoring historical figures that our culture reveres. Maybe every once in a while we should be re-evaluating who is worthy of such reverence.

Comment Re:Truly an impossible task (Score 1) 110

Although then every single tax jurisdiction - city, county, state, and federal - must have a different ad.

All they have to do is have some copy up front that says "As low as 19.99!*"

And then have some fine print at the bottom: "* Final price may vary depending on local tariffs" or whatever legalize the lawyers come up with. The ISP version of "prices and participation may vary".

Slashdot Top Deals

Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. -- Pablo Picasso

Working...