In a worse case scenario, AI superintelligence would be like giving hostile genius aliens root access to most every computer in the world. In a relatively "happy" scenario, white collar work is nearly eliminated in 1 or 2 decades and the billionaires hide in their bunkers while everyone else is just expected to rot. It can get a lot worse than Iran having nukes (which would be concerning for Israel and the Saudis).
Don't be naive, this is just the foot in the door. And it requires you to have a relationship with Google or Apple, which itself is not anonymous.
This is kind of like saying that car wrecks wouldn't happen if we had training and standards that excluded 95% of drivers... You're right in that it would greatly reduce the number of fatalities, but people are still people and it wouldn't eliminate them (see the recent Prime Air runway excursion for an example). You'd also lose the benefit of all those other drivers being able to get to where they want to go... American society would have to completely restructure itself.
It's simply bad engineering to pick a fundamentally unsafe tool over a safe one that will do the job just as well. Computer verifiable checks strictly beat depending on a human to follow best practices. Talent is multidimensional and reducing the job requirements for any one dimension means you hire candidates that are better in other important aspects. Engineering must consider technical realities, human nature, and market efficiencies.
Not sure how much it applies to VR, but as a point of comparison, VHF dominates drone racing because it has super low latency (15ms). Racers put up with it despite the crap quality, despite DJI and walksnail offering systems with 20-40 ms latency. Maybe DJI race mode (15ms) is changing that.
To somewhat discount this perspective: latency isn't the only benefit of analog... factors such as interference and penetration also come into play, as does price. But still, at 60 MPH, every 10ms is almost a yard of extra distance before the drone responds.
Ahh, thanks... was not aware of that term/phenomenon, though it makes sense.
Summer loads typically peak mid-day and follow solar generation closely... batteries help make managing supply and demand easier, but huge capacity isn't necessarily needed or helpful.
By contrast, it's winter loads that experience the morning/evening "double peak". That's where these large capacities come into play... the sun directly warms houses during the middle of the day (cutting the need for heating) and the batteries soak up excess dollar generation, which then gets spent as the sun sets and in the morning hours the next day.
We had a creeping at work put cameras under women's desks aimed to catch up-skirts. Deploying the cameras ahead of time doesn't lessen the offense. "Passive" stalking an entire population is a grave threat to our collective well-being.
This. Hoping we can control superintelligent AI when we have no experience controlling superintelligent AIs is like hoping you can invent automobiles and never ever have any wreck, not even once. Because if you wreck--if your super AI escapes long enough to establish itself--then it's game over for humanity.
I agree, but also: open source isn't really a viable concept for frontier AI models. You can't release the training data because it undoubtedly contains unsavory, politically-misaligned, copyrighted, and illegal content: you'd drown in p.r. and legal problems. And on the recipient side, nobody can afford billions of dollars of GPUs to make their own fork.
Let's wait until the last possible second to talk about preventing a world-ending catastrophe. What could possibly go wrong?
No, actually. The amount raised so far is $1.2 million. And the money hours to her parents for (purportedly) the living expenses they have incurred in relocating to Massachusetts to attend the legal proceedings, not to Lindsay herself.
This whole thing is being spun as if liberal women support the atrocious death of those three kids. They don't. Don't fall for rage bait.
How do you know? Until last year, we humans were the only creatures capable of high-level reasoning to ever exist on this planet. Something new is being created, something that is potentially capable of self-improving and becoming far smarter than us. We should treat it seriously because--once an AI gets sufficiently smart and resourceful--we won't be able to stop it.
He did think... his post laid out a plausible chain of consequences stemming from the legislation. Maybe it's right or maybe it's wrong, but he added something to the conversation instead of resorting to name-calling.
The winning 2016 candidate lost the popular vote.
... to blame store employees instead of technology or the management decision to knowingly deploy a flawed technology.
You'll start to see such "accountability sinks" a lot whenever a company needs to weasle out of legal and PR situations caused by their AI deployments.
Someone is unenthusiastic about your work.
