Comment Re: You're shitting me! (Score 1) 81
Lol did I make an ACAB cry?
Lol did I make an ACAB cry?
Also the second cheapest place. There's real good solar panels made in Canada
Utility scale solar could do a lot of work even without batteries, because if you orient the panels correctly they match the demand curve fairly well, albeit not perfectly. So you're mad at people who don't deserve it, and also with no good reason.
He doesn't understand that power lines heat up so he's also not going to understand that they stretch when that happens, you're going to have to write it out for him in big letters
We had to work around capitalism, PGE was never going to do it on its own.
I don't know about all that but it seems to me like the lawyer's client has a fraud case against him. The lawyer didn't actually do the job.
It is destroying far more jobs than it is creating, so no it's not creating jobs, because when we say that what we mean is that it's creating NET jobs. So just no.
Also, even if that were not true, it's doing it at a rate that will kill people, if it hasn't already. Therefore celebrating it or even making excuses is ghoulish at best.
Well, now at least we know your origin story. You keep your brain in your ass and it was paddled at least one too many times in school.
What if the new tools scoop you, making all the work you have done in a problem worthless to you overnight? Was it still a good idea to use them when they eliminated your justification for existence? We're all destroying ourselves by using these things.
For coding can you not give it access only to write into your IDE? Which in theory could restrict it to specific files that you're working on?
Artificial does not mean not real. It means made with intent and skill. (The amount of skill varies.) But it's not intelligent, so it's not artificial intelligence.
A better but not perfect term would be "simulated intelligence". It gives a similar but not equivalent result to intelligence. It can even appear intelligent, and it's often used in this way. But then it does things which are obviously a product more of the RNG than anything else, and you can see through the facade. If you said something as stupid as it's capable of you would likely notice as you said it, and maybe even as you were preparing to say it. LLMs don't have whatever it is that we use to do that, obviously, or they would do it too.
Because what it's doing is clearly not the same thing,
Argue that case, with references to how LLMs actually internally reach their results.
The physical biology is certainly different, but this isn't a question about "what things are made of" or even the specific NN type (e.g. smooth vs. spiking), and training differences don't even come into the picture; it's a question of the broad strokes of how conclusions are reached on forward processing.
It's a real problem because that information is supposed to be used for oversight.
Any cop who misused the system should be disciplined, but we all know that only happens for not being abusive enough.
They eventually put some of that stuff in their stores and it was selling ok, but it was too late.
Aww, did I hurt poww waist feefees? Poww wittwe swowfwake.
I'm all for computer dating, but I wouldn't want one to marry my sister.