Thank you for proving my point there.

No.

Let's abolish listening to clowns who think all taxation is theft, they only want to burn everything down instead of fixing it because they are weak minded and lazy.

10-20 years is a long time in semiconductor process technology years whether China knows it or not.

I've never encountered any real conservatives that I know of. They all want to turn the clock back, not slow it down.

I buy food at the airport and take it on the plane because even with airport prices its still much better than the buy-on-board cost.

It's hallucinating solutions

Decrease in traffic, which reduces revenues. Was that supposed to be a trick question?

We learned in the 1940s that you can't compromise with Nazis. Then we forgot all about it and now we've got Nazis everyfuckingwhere.

Too bad we didn't do what Germany did after WWII, but after the civil war, and educate people as to why being uber-racists is bad. Instead we gave them the electoral college so they could have more voting power than they deserved.

We're the only country which still has an electoral college and guess what? It's a fucking shit show which only serves to let shitty people have an outsized voice in government.

Also from Louis CK:

His dick out at inappropriate times

It identifies as GACHA.

If that were true, we'd have nothing to do. Emitting orders of magnitude more CO2 than volcanism makes us a big deal.

"Not really any different than people who want to believe Trump."

Trump lies more than any three of them combined, and that is different. The difference may be only one of degree, but it's still different, and your accusations of sycophancy are a poor disguise for yours and based on unfounded assumptions. Run along and preach false equivalence on behalf of a fascist traitor dictator rapist elsewhere if you must, I'm not buying.

You've completely submitted to big oil PR and you want to talk this shit? Cope harder.

There is no direct equivalent to DLL hell on Linux because nothing precludes you installing multiple different versions of a library and loading them at the same time like DLLs. But if you go trying to get a new version of some software on Debian that nobody has bothered to package yet, you will often have a bad time. You will need to build dependencies for your dependencies and then you will need to build dependencies for those dependencies and so on. You can help keep your system clean by setting the prefix someplace in opt or whatever and installing all of them to their own tree, but then you will also find that some of them have config files that you're going to have to change the locations for so that they don't conflict with other versions of the same deps you've got installed and so on. The more complex the package the more of this you will deal with as it will have more deps and those will have more deps and so on.

No, it isn't. I mean, it's not the same line of thinking. Systemd does only exist because of redhat. It doesn't solve any problems because there are things you can't do in unit files, so what you wind up having is unit files that cause systemd to call shell scripts, at which point you have gained nothing.

Snap, as shit as it is, addresses a real problem in a way that at least offers a solution to the problem. Systemd addresses a made-up problem in a way that doesn't even solve it. The only thing the two have in common is that they both create new problems.