Comment Just like Russia (Score 4, Interesting) 11
Is someone, or someones, inside the supply chain redirecting chips? Is this the same as the servers getting to China? Or is this merely a case of someone buying this stuff under a shell company and then passing it along?
Comment Re:I've noticed that too (Score 1) 59
I noticed this in Claude (from DDG). It invariably tries to shorten sentences or make them more compact and concise. Sometimes that can be good, but most times long-winded sentences are what are needed.
Comment Re:Options missing (Score 1) 22
Just like Firefox. There is no easy way to turn off being harassed by an intrusive pop-up telling me about a new update.
There used to be. It was a simple checkbox. But somewhere along the way someone had to justify their existence and removed that simple checkbox in favor of harassment.
Comment Re:Completely different (Score 5, Insightful) 97
Would like to add one tidbit because I've had this same conversation at work. The professor stated they used AI to help edit only after hundred of hours of writing. In other words, they did the heavy lifting and only used AI at the end to help refine what they had already done.
Is this any different than a human editor? If I write a book, do what I can to edit it down, then go to an editor who makes suggests, removes or reorders parts, and so on, is that any different than having AI do the same thing? In both cases you wrote the words. In both cases you went somewhere else to help edit.
If people claim that using AI to edit a work is "cheating" because it's no longer your work, then the same should apply to a human editor.
Comment Re:Not necessarily a bad thing (Score 2) 215
People on ALL social media NEED to see what the other side says just as much as their own. Echo chambers make everything worse for everyone.
Ragebait isn't about seeing what the other side says.
It's about seeing an inflammatory caricature of the other side.
For example, a Liberal isn't going to see some Conservative discussing some of the hard tradeoffs we'll need to pay down the debt. They'll see a Conservative proposing that Trump be given a 3rd term and trans kids get rounded up and forced into conversion therapy or some crap like that.
Meanwhile, Conservatives won't see some Liberal discussing the economics of Universal Healthcare. They'll see someone proposing that the police be defunded and all drugs are legalized.
Ragebait creates echo chambers because it gives the false impression that everyone on the other side is insane.
Comment Re:Sad that a company that actually does something (Score 4, Interesting) 73
This is why a lot of chronic diseases will NEVER have cures. It's more profitable to treat than to cure. Treat someone over a lifetime and milk 100k out of them. Treat someone once and present them with a 100k price tag to pay all at once and the consumer or insurance company will balk at the cost.
It's a fun conspiracy theory, but this is actually just how biology works.
There's basically four kinds of things that can go wrong with our bodies. Infections, mechanical issues, system errors, and cancer.
Infections we can cure by helping the body to kill off the infection, it's only some rare stubborn ones like AIDS that are chronic like you describe.
Mechanical issues we can fix with surgery.
System errors? That's stuff like genetic disorders where our body creates too much of hormone A or doesn't create the proper form of protein B. The problem is in our DNA and you can't cure it without rewriting our DNA (which we're getting to).
And then there's cancers, which are similar to infections, where we try to kill it (as they're doing here), though weirdly, some research suggests treating it as a chronic issue might be better for the patients.
In either case, it's not the fact that pharma is deciding "don't make a pill to cure it, just find a lifetime treatment!". It's only in the past few years that we're reaching the point where we can actually cure things that were traditionally chronic.
Comment Re:Absolutely (Score 1) 30
Comment Or just pollute all the time like Musk does (Score 3, Informative) 72
Needless to say, the EPA has not done anything about this even with its own decision of illegality.
No need to switch to generators when you can use them from day one and not have to worry about doing anything under the current regime.
Comment To all the whiners (Score 1) 144
Instead of rare books, let us rare video games or computers. Let's say someone bought a rare version of a Ninentendo system (an early edition) and said, "You know what, I'm going to see what happens if I apply a larger and larger force to it. Let's see how long it stays intact."
Mind you, they did a 3-D scan of the system so you can digitally see it, but the physical copy no longer exists.
How many of you would raise a stink at destroying it?
If not Nintendo, pick something you like and go back to its earlier days where something is rare and someone wants to destroy it, just because.
One of the things people complain about the digital age is loss of information. Sure, these books "exist" in a digital form today, but what about in 50 years?
This is why physical books are still superior to digital. We can still read books/scrolls/clay tablets from centuries ago. It is doubtful the same will be said for digital books.
Comment Huh?!?! (Score 1) 75
And Threads now appears to have roughly 66% more monthly active users than X.
I've heard almost nothing about Threads recently. Certainly no indication they were more popular than Twitter.
Is their user count some sort of trick with how they interface with Instagram? Or is Twitter just turning into a ghost town without people realizing it?
Comment Re:Free Money, Free Housing and a Free Miele (Score 1) 92
This is one of the reason why Western governments do invest in foreign aid.
It's not just charity (though that's certainly an element), but the more stable and prosperous developing nations are the less likely they're going to have to deal with a refugee crisis.
Comment Completely infeffective (Score 4, Insightful) 84
As any anti-vaxxer like Robert F. Kennedy, Jr will tell you, if it's not 100% effective then it's useless. This drop in Hepatitis C cases can in no way be attributed to an antiviral medication. In reality, it's just people's natural immune system becoming more effective.
Note: if you have to ask, yes it is.
Comment Just top testing (Score 1) 115
That sounds so familiar. Just stop them from purchasing and you won't have to worry about them testing and finding flaws in your cameras.
Comment Re:Ivermectin is better (Score 2) 209
Nothing in particular. Just the inability to move, muscle pain or stiffness, joint pain, and swollen, painful, or tender lymph glands in the armpit to name just a few. And that's just for dosage given under supervision of a doctor. If someone decides to use the horse version, they can have seizures or go blind. This is in addition to other neurologal or gastrointestinal issues. Or death.
So now that you have been factually informed, go ahead and make excuses and/or move the goalposts.