Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Gambling? Partially!! (Score 1) 80

There are legitimate uses for futures markets to hedge bets. Lets say you want to guarantee your price of oil next week, you buy that oil with a contract with a set price now because you are expecting it to go down. You are predicting that by executing a contract now that the future price of oil will drop and make you money but will lose money if it actually went up. These prediction markets are doing the exact same thing. Lets say your business is a hot dog stand outside of a stadium and if the team wins you get tons of business but if they lose, you get little business. You can choose to bet on a loss to hedge the risk that they lose, meaning: if the team wins, you lose your bet but make money selling, but if they lose you make money on the bet and miss out. Either outcome you are able to normalize your profit, exactly like the oil bet. Or instead of hedging you can also multiply your profits. These markets allow this to happen, it is a legal form of gambling already as many have said similar to a stock market, the only difference is that it operates on sports team performance (companies) rather than company performance.

Comment Re:What I find amusing is... (Score 0) 38

LLMs don't actually know their own capabilities.

Those observations are somewhat out of date. Modern (ie 2026) frontier models have a lot more "knowledge" than their weights.

e.g. When I asked Claude about its own memory, it used a "product self-knowledge skill" which includes looking at its own SKILL.md file.
I believe Qwen 3.5 has similar capability, but of course you need to have it configured.

Comment Re:Could someone post the frustration regex code? (Score 4, Informative) 38

Ask Claude? He says:

This came out of the accidental Claude Code source leak on March 31, 2026, when Anthropic accidentally shipped a source map in their npm package exposing ~512,000 lines of TypeScript source code.
The regex lives in a file called userPromptKeywords.ts and looks like this:
/\b(wtf|wth|ffs|omfg|shit(ty|tiest)?|dumbass|horrible|awful|
piss(ed|ing)? off|piece of (shit|crap|junk)|what the (fuck|hell)|
fucking? (broken|useless|terrible|awful|horrible)|fuck you|
screw (this|you)|so frustrating|this sucks|damn it)\b/

Alex Kim's blog
As for what it's for: according to researcher Alex Kim, who first documented it, the signal doesn't change the model's behavior or responses — it's a product health metric to track whether users are getting frustrated, and whether that rate goes up or down across releases.

Comment Re:Linux desktop with 16 Mb RAM (Score 1) 110

Linux desktop with 16 Mb RAM was possible in the 90s

No, 2MB was never enough for a Linux desktop. I had 8MB on my 386 and it was only just sufficient.

Yeah, Bytes vs bits. But who measures RAM in bits?
I remember too 8MB being the minimum, but upgraded to 12MB so it was possible to do something else while the kernel was compiling.
How did we get to the point where 8000MB is considered a bare minimum?

Slashdot Top Deals

One of the most overlooked advantages to computers is... If they do foul up, there's no law against whacking them around a little. -- Joe Martin

Working...