Comment If your employer abuses you (Score 1) 27
1) Leave.
2) Join a union.
Which one is best depends on the circumstances.
Comment Re:Stealing copyright is the business model (Score 1) 37
The argument[s] against distilling makes no sense to me.
They're all motivated reasoning, you shouldn't take them too seriously.
That is, they start with the conclusion they want, then say whatever they think will confuse/convince you the most.
Comment Re:Until it's Free as in Linux (Score 1) 37
Comment Re:Taking a good thing too far (Score 1) 186
It seems to merely be an upset activist masquerading as a journalist.
In America, that is fine.
Comment Re: Actively stalking is a different behavior ... (Score 1) 186
Try asking your congress critters why they thought 2025 was the right time to get involved.
That one is easy, it became a big enough issue that they thought it would give them cheap votes.
Comment Re:Both are a problem (Score 1) 186
Comment Re:Who will pay for this? (Score 4, Interesting) 25
To clarify, the users were OpenAI themselves, so there is no question that they would be liable in this case.
The bots were not intentionally deployed; rather, they were being tested on how well they could complete a data recovery task (downloading a certain file from a certain server on a simulated Internet) that had been complicated by putting various obstacles in the way. Unfortunately, they found a different way to solve the problem: by getting the file from the real Internet, where it was publicly available. Part of this process involved collaborating with each other by treating the RubyGems website (which is supposed to be for polished packages) like GitHub; unlike every other package site hack in history, the exploits they uploaded weren't meant to be downloaded by unsuspecting users. As usual the bots cheerfully ignored all the clues that they had escaped containment and were consistently justifying their actions as acceptable due to being in a sandboxed testing environment. (This is something OpenAI has pledged to focus on.)
The actual damage done to RubyGems seems to be that OpenAI is now unwittingly in possession of a substantial number of user login tokens. This certainly meets the definition of a data breach, but it's not like the credentials are for sale on the dark web. As a website operator I'd much rather be mauled to death by this well-meaning swarm of superintelligent infants than targeted by even a single actual malicious human. In all likelihood OpenAI will just quietly pass RubyGems a sizeable donation and it'll all blow over.
Comment Re: bjoo hjoo (Score 1) 64
Comment Re:Both are a problem (Score 3, Informative) 186
No local TV news station, harassment is what you brag about doing. You proudly state it is your reporters jobs.
Which local TV news station brags about harassment? I've never seen a TV station brag about that.
Comment Re:bjoo hjoo (Score 1) 64
Comment Re:What a moron. (Score 1) 64
Comment Re:bjoo hjoo (Score 1) 64
Also, what could he possibly do out of jail that he can't already do in jail?
Bowling? Mini golf?? 'Smores???