Wow, you're really a loon if you think that's a winning strategy: have Hillary pick a Republican running mate? That might pick up some R voters who don't like Trump, but it'll also cause tons of D voters (including everyone who considers themselves a progressive) to sit out the race or vote third-party. This strategy actually would have been great for getting the Green Party a lot more votes than they got with her crappy pick of Kaine.
Sanders *was* a qualified Democrat. He ran as one, and that's all you have to do. But I guess I shouldn't be surprised that the Democrat Party faithful think that only long-time Party members should be allowed to play in their party. No wonder they have such a hard time getting progressives to turn out to vote for them, by pushing partisan politics over ideals and doing the right thing. Honestly, if there's any good to come out of this crazy election, it'll be the utter destruction of the Democratic Party. At least the Republicans are somewhat honest about their intentions and who they work for.
And Trump absolutely *is* unpopular. Countless polls have proven this. Just because people voted for him doesn't mean they actually liked him, same as Hillary.
Solar output in fact has decreased since the early 60s.
Also according to the Milankovitch cycles we should be in the middle of a cooling period, although the actual effect is quite complex (e.g. it makes a difference whether perihelion occurs in the austral or boreal summer). So it is also possible that we might be in for slight warming over the next twenty thousand years. But even if we were in for dramatic warming due to orbital resonance, that would be on the order of 0.1C/century, much lower than the changes we've observed.
You left out volcanoes, which are a natural source of CO2 (as well as cooling particulates).
If you add up all the known sources of natural climate variation you end up with no warming trend since 1900 (source).
Fabric is "a modular mobile platform" designed to help app developers improve the "stability, distribution, revenue and identity"
- what would Twitter know about improving revenue exactly? If they do know something about it how come they didn't do that for themselves?
the ability to natively embed tweets in other apps to signing in with your Twitter credentials were made possible by Fabric.
- I guess that's their definition of 'everything'.
You can sign in and you can tweet. The 2 things that Tweeter does.
"We quickly realized that our missions are the same -- helping mobile teams build better apps, understand their users, and grow their businesses," the Fabric team wrote in its announcement.
- right, the actual mission being tracking everything anybody does on their phone and using the phone platform to push advertising to users.
"Fabric and Firebase operate mobile platforms with unique strengths in the market today."
- the F U squared.
And if you're an existing Fabric customer, don't worry, the platform will continue to function.
- ooookaaaay, I guess if you are known for randomly shutting down projects you have to put out statements like that...
You'll just need to agree to the new terms of service, which will be available once the deal is completed.
- right, so if you are a developer who uses that stuff make sure to grow an extra kidney, because they are coming for yours.
And if you choose other stations the adjustments make the past look warmer.
You can't cherry pick a handful of stations and use the results to impugn the validity of the adjustments. You have to look at the justifications made for the adjustments to decide whether they make sense or not.
What Geoffrey said. It's easy enough to pull the instrumental record global average data into a spreadsheet and plot it; I've done it several times myself.
Also be aware of what error bars can and cannot tell you. You can't tell about the statistical significance of trends just by comparing adjacent years with error bars. It's the wrong statistical test to talk about decades-long tends. You might never ever see a year which is statistically significantly warmer than a prior year at some level of confidence, yet have a trend which over a decade or more hits that confidence level.
No, that'd be the straw man you've been swallowing for the past ten years.
The link I provided was showing the adaptability of our sense perception mechanisms, which underlies mirror-touch synesthesia, which has nothing to do with adapting to tools other than it uses some of the same neural phenomena.
If you assume an ex-prisoner will commit crimes again, your prison system isn't working.
At least in the U.S., it's a good bet that a criminal will re-commit. This may be a sign that the prison system isn't working, but it doesn't change the fact that we have a recidivism rate of over 50% in the first year after release alone.
That said, if we don't give "rehabilitated" convicts the benefit of the doubt after "paying their debt," we're pretty much guaranteeing that they'll have to return to crime. Convicts do need the ability to escape their criminal past.
just not in the US.
That's unfortunate. It looks a bit small, though.
Not actual radio-like telepathy like in sci-fi stories, but an inbuilt capacity to actually experience what our brains think other people are experiencing.
One of the classic experiments like this is to get a subject wearing goggles to identify with a mannequin. Of course this is artificially induced; we didn't evolve in a world with 3D goggles and cameras. But there is a condition called "mirror-touch synesthesia" in which this occurs naturally, in which people spontaneously experience what someone else is experiencing.
The parallel element I see is the brain somehow generates a sensation without an appropriate physical input, and the phenomenon of mirror touch synesthesia suggests to me this isn't just a curious bug in our brain architecture. The 1.6% of people who report spontaneous mirror synesthesia also score higher than the general population on measures of empathy. I suspect it may also be linked in some way to our ability to learn by copying what others do.
This is a really exciting time in neuroscience, and synesthesia seems like an interesting target for DIY brain hackers. Mirror-type synesthesia particularly so because it's easy to induce. The rubber hand illusion is probably the easiest dramatic effect to produce at home.
"The medium is the massage." -- Crazy Nigel