Comment Re:That's handy, the assumptions aren't for sale. (Score 1) 50
Oh, and they are saying that String Theory is a theory that fits in the space of possible theories - it would be really nice to have a different theory to compare.
Oh, and they are saying that String Theory is a theory that fits in the space of possible theories - it would be really nice to have a different theory to compare.
And what 'requires' the laws of physics to remain stable?
I think, you've missed the purpose of the paper.
It isn't trying to prove a 'theory' about the universe, it's trying to describe the shape of space that all possible theories live in, for the given assumptions.
There's nothing requiring the laws of physics to remain stable and the team aren't trying to imply their is.
They're saying "if" the laws of physics to remain stable across different energy levels, scales etc, than these things we need to think about, to come up with a theory that might be 'provable' in some sense of the word.
Does anyone know if this is overlaps or is related at all to the idea that there are three types of 'time' for different scale interactions? Which I vaguely half-remember.
I will read the article when it is not past my bedtime.
Many Worlds Interpretation.
No. It's more that each photon is matched up with a anti-photon aka the photon being absorbed.
There's no such thing as 'time' and the universe doesn't diverge at every possible moment.
It's just a bit....fuzzy. If you look closely.
Any funding for Open Source Maintainers?
Or is this another example of how companies refuse to fund Open Source, and will only pay if it directly benefits themselves?
I doubt the morality of Open Source.
"Regardless of the legal speed limit, your Buick must be operated at speeds faster than 85 MPH (140kph)." -- 1987 Buick Grand National owners manual.