Comment Re:uh (Score 1) 179
record ambient conversations illegally
Only illegal outside of single-party consent states.
"Ambient conversations" include (and some would argue consist exclusively of) conversations in which you're not a party.
record ambient conversations illegally
Only illegal outside of single-party consent states.
"Ambient conversations" include (and some would argue consist exclusively of) conversations in which you're not a party.
There is a legitimate use for people with certain disabilities, but sadly there's no way to use them for legitimate purposes without Meta having the opportunity to piggy-back on the usage and abuse them for illegitimate purposes.
One word: Meta.
A three camera cluster should do - any one goes off line the other two can still coordinate laser fire.
The very first line, before the fine article even begins, says that it's a guest post by Henry Cohn, so the summary is simply false.
""Run as fast as you can.""
Translation: Me like money
As an anti-racist with a geography degree, this is solving a problem that doesn't exist. Walk into any classroom on earth and chances are good they won't have the mercator projection on the wall, they'll have something better representative of area, often a Robinson projection.
How do you propose that this would work? Would Flock have access to each police department's database of active cases? That would be a cure worse than the disease.
Ok, I'm tempted. Not enough to preorder, but if the reviews are good enough I might go for this.
Just wait until they connect it up to a Robin Hood game.
I prefer the Martian bear.
Forgetting he exists would be the best punishment.
This reminds me of a case where a British court and an American court each ordered litigants not to litigate a case in the other's court.This was in law school decades ago and I'm too lazy to look it up, but it's the same kind of issue where if you want to do business in either country you can get easily screwed.
The colonies fought a war to ensure that the USA is not subject to the jurisdiction of the UK. The UK may not regulate US entities without the consent of the US government
That's a non-sequitur. The USA is not subject to the jurisdiction of the UK, but US citizens physically in the UK are, and companies based in the US but doing business in the UK have to comply with UK law as it affects their operations in the UK or accept the corresponding penalties as the cost of doing business there.
when the government interferes a publication.
Paxton.
and mango unchained.
scrub with mineral oil
The one day you'd sell your soul for something, souls are a glut.