And to spawn-camp others.

I get the idea why remote AI features could be a good trojan horse to get you to send your data into the cloud, but it doesn't make sense to think local AI would be such a trojan horse.

Ahh, the optimism of n00bs - I kind of miss it.

Zuboff states that surveillance capitalism "unilaterally claims human experience as free raw material for translation into behavioural data [which] are declared as a proprietary behavioural surplus, fed into advanced manufacturing processes known as 'machine intelligence', and fabricated into prediction products that anticipate what you will do now, soon, and later." She states that these new capitalist products "are traded in a new kind of marketplace that I call behavioural futures markets."

Looking forward to the surprise news that ICE will have expanded powers to use Gestapo tactics on everyone.

Presumably when it gets to zero and keeps going, it wraps around to 100%, right? Keep going tech-bros, we're almost there!

Even better is to just avoid Roblox, surely?

How best to protect your kids in a room full of paedos? Avoid the room altogether. Unless the cost/benefit makes sense - which it doesn't.

Roblox is fixing the problem of others creeping on kids by themselves creeping on kids?

2/3 - not bad. Soy sauce is super-processed by bacteria over a year, I believe.

A raw carrot
Pringles
Soy sauce

Are all foods for sale tested before they can go on sale? I don't think so but how about this is introduced? Manufacturers of things intended to be ingested (let's not go so far as to say 'food') could pay a nominal fee which is a function of the number and quality of ingredients.

Then, on some random schedule, a random selection of foods is collected from random sales locations and a random proportion of those tested by a party other than the one collecting the items - to ensure against an emissionsgate-type scam (i.e. quality is good on submission for testing but reverts back to shady-low-quality ingredients for everyone else) or collaboration between the collector and the producer.

Voila! Food manufacturers are incentivised to provide good-quality food.

Maybe the AI powered think tanks can come up with something more original the yet another freaking cold war.

Can't you figure out how to cooperate? Too challenging?

Pursuit of truth for truth's sake !== The appearance of the pursuit of truth to boost reputation

Perhaps there's an incentive for manufacturers to detail how they're exploiting customers but I'm not aware of it - perhaps one day when openness is valued above profit-resulting-from-obscurity?

I suppose if, instead of issuing free-floating (essentially-)PDF contracts, manufacturers registered their contract terms with a system of some sort (trying to avoid the old-think 'centralised' but some system which is universally reachable) in a common language, it could be data-mined by anyone to extract new insights.

Until this connection is broken, science will be flawed and untrustworthy and sadly deliver on its potential.

People's reputation dot dot dot the survivability of their genes depends on their body of work yes?

Its not clear that everyone playing the game of science can overpower their instinct to win by any means necessary, in service of the purity of the scientific method.

Just look at certain people who've thrust themselves into power by corrupt means to see what I mean.

I'd go further, and add that the better the scientist's contradicting evidence the more academia would be happy to have him (*).

In principle.

(*) or her

So you're agreeing with this:

A study that suggests its not going to be that bad will be immediately questioned along with the credentials and bias of the researcher.

ProTip: you are, as you said the same thing in a different way.