Comment Re:Horseshit (Score 1) 60
A single sector as an example.
It is harvest time in the upper half of the united states, the average farmer burns about 5.2KG of fossils fuels to produce 50KG of corn from opening the field to the local sale point. Another 2.5KG of fossil fuels is burnt to deliver it to the ports, and another half KG to deliver to international markets, before similar amounts of energy are used on transport to get it to foreign end users.
For that effort the farmer is rewarded the cash ebullient of 9KG of fuel, with that they have to upgrade and maintain their land, pay taxes, machines and pay themselves for the effort. 83% of farming is direct or indirect fuel costs (fertilizer is just another fuel), add another 10 for source materials and seed IP that is also largely past fuel consumption. Some of the most productive food growing in the united states is counted as per capita fuel consumption by Americans when 15% is shipped away as grain and another 5% to 10% is shipped away as manufactured products. If there were a more efficient way to produce food, the corporate farmers would have already adopted it.
Think as you grow up and learn how the world works, you will find when people are paying the energy bill vs paying themselves they do typically make their efforts as efficient as they can. You will also figure out the marketing, logistics and local packaging has more to do with end user cost than what is immediately visible.