Comment Re:Maybe stick to the speed limit? (Score 2) 160
Related: Florida red light camera law is unconstitutional because tickets go to car owner and not driver.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Related: Florida red light camera law is unconstitutional because tickets go to car owner and not driver.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Also, Ozempic is approx $500/month out of pocket. Who the fuck has that much money, but not the willpower to join a gym and eat better?
Take a good hard look at the average multi-millionaire beach body and understand affordability has fuck-all to do with it.
There's a reason Hollyweird looks like a 2027 documentary on GLP-1 addiction and abuse. They can afford healthy food, personal trainers, and the best gyms all day every day and they STILL choose the shortcut.
There are methods that allow you to get million answers from the AI in a sequence without a single mistake. ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?... )
There are probably many methods to ensure that AI can do something accurately and correctly.
Ever wonder how many methods there are to manipulate and convince AI that it's wrong?
Today's AI tends to remind me of Google hacking 20+ years ago. I fear the early days can present challenges we haven't even thought of trying to curtail or control yet.
It's a Nikon F5.
Guess we now know why you keep whining here: you think you're a special tech genius because you know how to set the time on a camera.
Why does my taxpaying wallet have a feeling someone at NASA wearing a badge titled "Space Camera Technician" (AKA one-fucking-job), is quietly sweating in a corner somewhere, hoping they also didn't forget to format that memory card after borrowing it to play patty-cake on St. Patty's Patty..
The interesting question isnâ(TM)t that 73% of people accept faulty AI reasoningâ¦
Itâ(TM)s which 73%.
What happens to the segment of the population that already struggles with critical thinking? The folks whoâ(TM)ve historically bought into things like flat earth, QAnon, miracle cures, etc.
Those groups didnâ(TM)t suddenly appear because of AI, they existed long before it. They already demonstrate a tendency to accept authoritative-sounding information without much scrutiny.
So what changes now?
We name the new AI "PT Barnum" and turn it up to 11 via a Spinal Tap.
Then we fire up the industrial popcorn machine, and remember the good ol' days.
Good luck to anyone born after nineteen-hundred-the-fuck-off-my-lawn.
People who are morbidly obese are not feeling hungry all the time, they're dopamine addicts that like the feeling food gives them. They eat whether they're hungry or not. We already have an appetite suppressant - it's called dietary fiber. It makes you feel full. Doesn't stop the addicts. That's why that new weight loss shot works so well. It stops people from feeling happy from eating. So this is a nonsense invention that won't do anything.
go months or even years without eating -- all while maintaining a healthy heart and plenty of muscle mass.
If the new discovery can solve for that obvious problem in the GLP-1 drug epidemic, then it's far from a "nonsense" invention.
Perhaps Hollywood can avoid replacing their growing collection of unhealthy stick figures with AI, which will be ironically programmed to present the pre-Ozempic version on the big screen.
Here's the thing, some folks do the discipline and keep a healthy weight, but they are basically always feeling hunger. Some people don't feel it but some people are having to constantly fight sensation of hunger, with a respite of a little bit after a meal, and almost never feeling 'full'.
I wonder how much that hunger sensation problem is fed by bad or alternative diets that avoid meat-based proteins?
Not saying those diets are bad for you per se, but I could eat rice and leafy greens until it's coming out of my ears. It will never satiate me like eating meat does. As it always has, which is not an uncommon phenomenon.
or wind turbines. That's because oil makes the world work.
Without oil, natgas and coal we live in the 18th century.
If python blood is 6 months away from a 12-figure IPO in the Waistline wars and Body Positivity battles, Greed will invade the Florida Everglades and turn it into another country from a tax perspective. You’ll need a Visa to cross alligator alley.
And all the new web app versions eats memory like a starved hog. 8GB isn't enough 640GB might be enough to solve your problems for this generation.
Let's hope the bubble pops soon and 640GB doesn't require a credit check and two banking C-level signatories to authorize the loan..
Hahaha. Oh, wait, you're serious? Let me laugh even harder. HAHAHA.
Ironically that was also the Slashdot community response when listening to victims of The Slashdot Effect brag about how awesome their server infrastructure is/was, five minutes before the post went up on the main page.
And we ALL clicked. And laugh-ranted, in search of a mirror by the time the first frosty piss of a post went up.
Slashdot. Offering quality technical DDoSing and server stress testing since, get the fuck off my lawn.
I think they shouldn't have those sherpas either. If you wanna claim you've climbed the everest, you should have to carry your gear, your oxygen, your un-poisoned food. The balooning ego that propelled you there should be all you need to carry it all.
I think that's more of a mutually agreed thing, since sherpas can easily make $5-10K per client. Sherpas were also mandated by the local government following a rather horrific 2013 season.
As demand for luxury and "supported" climbs increases, the cost for highly experienced Sherpas has increased, contributing to total expedition costs ranging from $40,000 (Nepali-led) to over $100,000 (Western luxury-led).
As always, money can motivate most anyone to walk the walk. That said, I don't agree with "supported" climbs if that's going to eventually morph into sherpa escalator maintainers forced to cheat death on the regular, maintaining the half-million-dollar EverExpress Pass Plus service, sponsored by PeaksRUs.
What you're actually insisting an IP owner and creator do, is give you their IP for free..
Not at all. I've already bought and paid for that IP when I bought a copy of the game.
What are you talking about? You bought a license to use a game developed and wholly owned (including any in-house IP) by the company who created the damn thing. You, don't own any part of that beyond a compiled installer on read-only media unless the company happens to be publicly listed. And then you're likely restricted to a certain class of shares that essentially translate into you having NO real power beyond an investor willing to lose everything.
I would expect that licensing agreements for IP holders, while time limited, cannot be retroactively applied. If the car models and likenesses are already on the disc, it is impossible to remove them. I can see there being a stipulation that no further instances are to be sold or made available once that agreement has expired (which would be a reason to stop selling the game, for instance), but customers who already have the game already have those models/likenesses in-hand, so allowing them to continue using them is not in violation of any agreement.
If there is merely a contractual agreement between the game vendor and the car vendor, which both vendors agreed to licensing of that car vendor IP for a fixed period of time, then the expiration of that license is STILL between the same two vendors. Likely the reason Ubisoft is jettisoning any official support for the game rather than offer any type of alternative, is because Ubisoft was contractually obligated to do exactly that upon IP expiration. Is that a shitty tactic to force vendors to extend IP licensing with or-else type verbiage? Sure. Am I shocked if that was the case here? Not in the least.
Neither of the parties or contracts involved related to that IP, involve you the consumer in any way. You have been given a EULA-limited license to the game. With likely zero inherent guarantees regarding network play. And I doubt you're going to find even EU law in support of the consumer after 10+ years of support.
You the consumer can keep the game and continue to play (locally) with the skins that are already on the disc because you didn't sign the IP agreement with a car vendor now putting on the squeeze. The ones taking down all official support did.
You don't need OWA in space. It doesn't matter if I'm the only one who believes this, for I believe it enough for the entire world.
In space, no one can hear you scream "NO fucking email!"
(I mean seriously, they're wired up more than The Truman Show. As if we need written emails when NASA likely has every other form of communication running/streaming/saving/recording.)
For all I care they deserve it. If they can't or won't run the servers anymore they should at least release the server as freeware and allow for hobbyists to continue hosting the game. This used to be common practice with multiplayer games and we should enforce this practice by law, especially with people paid solid money for their game copies.
Publishers often delist driving games like The Crew and Forza Horizon when licensing agreements with car manufacturers expire.
Speaking of suing, is the user community willing to pay for the costs to renew the licensing agreements with all the relevant car vendors, IF they're even offering it?
Because that's likely what it would take to legally make this "free".
Time is the most valuable thing a man can spend. -- Theophrastus