Comment A Proper Palaver at the Gaff (Score 1) 21
Comment Re:Basic humanity (Score 1) 132
Comment Basic humanity (Score 1) 132
Comment Re:Communists lying (Re:Good luck with that.) (Score -1) 72
And you provided no citations. No wonder, your moderation is so high
Comment Communists lying (Re:Good luck with that.) (Score -1, Troll) 72
Also Trump is wrecking the economy and nobody wants to acknowledge that
Because it just is not true. Median household incomes in the US are just steadily rising (inflation-adjusted) since he took office in 2024.
Comment Do we know, what "woman" is now? (Score 0) 220
that presented themselves as "male" were paid more per task and perceived as more "human-like" than their "female" counterparts
Those complaining loudest are the ones, who can't define the term "woman".
Submission + - Trump administration suspends Microsoft from PERM program for H-1B employees (cnn.com)
Vice President JD Vance said Thursday that the tech giant is one of a handful of companies to be barred indefinitely from the Labor Department’s PERM program following an investigation spearheaded by the anti-fraud task force that he chairs.
Microsoft responded by claiming '80% of their applications were to extend or change the status of existing employees, and not new arrivals'
Comment Re:Kimmel Doesn't Want to give Republicans a Platf (Score 0, Troll) 281
Comment Re:Freedom (Score 5, Insightful) 281
Comment Just think (Score 2) 118
Comment Once is happenstance (Score 0) 70
One model going down is happenstance, two — a coincidence, the third one — it's enemy action.
— James Bond
Comment Classic misdirect (Score 1) 222
archived 1 Sep 2026 10:05:24 UTC
Comment Related: Holocaust survivors live longer (Score -1) 72
A related phenomenon is, Holocaust survivors live(d) longer. There is no good explanation and repeating the experiment is, thankfully, quite impossible...
Comment Re:Predictions versus reality [Re:The quiet part . (Score -1) 110
Simply the Forbes link was enough to confirm this point
Nope. One link is not enough — from the very beginning I asked, that each citation consist of two links: one to the prediction being made, the other — to confirmation/discussion of it coming true. Another rule was, the two links must be at least 5 years apart.
The purpose is easy to understand. A person can privately record 20 predictions of, say, an average temperature somewhere changing from -10 to +9 degrees. Five years later one of them will have made a precise match, and Forbes will write about him. If you didn't know about his 19 other predictions, you'll be impressed... This is why I insist on the prediction to have been published — prominently — ahead of time.
you purposely ignore the arguments
Because I was not asking for arguments — I was asking for citations...