Comment Re:Good luck with that. (Score 1) 72
Comment Re:Good luck with that. (Score 1) 72
Comment Re:No hurricanes (Score 1) 101
Comment Re:They should migrate away from the internet (Score 2) 105
Comment Re:No hurricanes (Score 1) 101
Which has what to do with coastal erosion on the west coast? You know the Mississippi is on the other side of the continental divide from California?
Allow me to spell it out for you. When founded, New Orleans used to at the mouth of the Mississippi on the gulf coast. Now it's inland. In the ensuing centuries, erosion dumped a ton of dirt into the gulf. Now Orleans is now about 100 miles from the mouth of the Mississippi.
What is the effect on hydro power? Dams can only hold so much water at a time. If it all arrives at once, they open spillways to let it through. If it comes over time, it can be held in behind the dam and used to generate electricity.
And yet Fontana Dam, as do many others in the east, do just fine without snow packed mountains. Look at the online maps application of your choice and check out how many hydroelectric dams are downstream from the Appalachians. Fontana Dam, BTW, powered the Oak Ridge, TN facility that created the uranium for the Manhattan Project -- all without snow capped mountains.
Comment Re:Elections are cheap (Score 3, Interesting) 38
Comment Re:Benchmarks (Score 1) 50
Comment Re:No hurricanes (Score 1) 101
more rain in southern California means more soil erosion in southern California.
Somebody has never heard of the Mississippi river.
more rain in southern California means less snow in the Cascades, which means worse fire seasons in the Pacific Northwest next year.
Maybe, maybe not.
less snow in the Cascades means less water in the hydroelectric reservoirs on the Columbia River, which means more natgas burning for the same energy output. This means more expensive energy up and down the entire west coast.
Uhm, wow. I generally think people may disagree with one another on this site, but usually for intelligent reasons. Go re-read what you just posted. You just posted in #2 that more rain is a bad thing for the Cascades, but then post about how more rain -- you know, water that powers hydroelectric reservoirs -- is bad. Make the connection before making a fool of yourself.