Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Would not destructive scanning be better? (Score 1) 143

Likely the books would end up in the dumpster anyways.
So maybe it's not about the destruction, maybe it's just about the staggeringly efficient 'feeding of the beast' that is AI.
I would think the copyright violation would be the thing folks would complain about, but it's not. Interesting, no?

Comment Re: pay for the environment (Score 2) 207

The benefits do go to the tenant, that's been the problem of getting this stuff financed. The landlord pays for better insulation, solar panels, heat pump and perhaps a battery, but it's the tenant who reaps the benefits in the form of a lower utility bill. In the Netherlands we can at least charge more for energy-efficient rent-controlled homes, but financially it is still rarely worth it... the housing market being what it is, you can charge €1000/month for a leaky bicycle shed. It seems that the Belgian solution is to simply force landlords to make the upgrades.

Comment Libraries and dealers trash rare books all the tim (Score 2, Insightful) 143

ust because a book is scarce or rare does not mean it is useful or desirable. There are big city book dealers that throw out dumpsters of books every day because they are of no use to anyone. The same is true of libraries: they have to unload old books to make space for new ones.

There have been myriad books published by small presses, or self published, in issues of a few hundred. The information in them may just be pulled from better books, be medical quackery, pseudoscience, alien autopsy insanity, etc. Nobody wants this crap no matter how rare it is.

Comment Re:Wages to Token Purchases (Score 3, Insightful) 66

I'd love to buy into SpaceX the space company. Not so much into SpaceX the AI company. Their valuation is based on xAI and X for a large part, and their outlook on their total addressable market is over 9/10ths AI - a market in which they are at the moment not all that well positioned.

Comment Yeah. (Score 1) 95

Just don't leave the country after you participate.

For that matter, you may suffer remote retaliation even if you stay home. I would leave this to the military or other government branch.

Also there is the question of legality, government operation or not. It sounds to me like vigilante justice. And countries who like their anti-American cybercriminals will certainly treat it as illegal. (Hence the advice not to leave the country.)

We certainly need a way to stop cybercrime, international or otherwise. But this doesn't strike me as a good way to go about it.

Finally a prediction: in the not too distant future, one or more offshoots from this will turn into unmanageable domestic criminal organizations.

Slashdot Top Deals

The brain is a wonderful organ; it starts working the moment you get up in the morning, and does not stop until you get to work.

Working...