Comment Re:not a spy (Score 1) 130
What do you expect? "Person X is a spy for country Y" rarely comes with any detail, even when it's blatantly true. Intelligence work is by definition secretive and probabilistic. Nobody's gonna give you a blow-by-blow Ian Fleming novel about an active investigation.
To be clear about what we actually do know about the "spy" label: members of the US Congress (on appropriate committees, etc) apparently received a memo from the US intelligence community that speculated she may have been recruited by the Chinese MSS (Ministry of State Security.) It's not hard to guess how they might have gotten this leverage: on at least two occasions she's run into problems with the CSRC (China Securities Regulatory Commission), which they could have offered to make go away.
That said, sometimes a black-market importer is just in it for the money, and Rep. Jim Himes (D-CT) said he found the narrative improbable after being briefed on it. Apparently the FBI is busy sniffing glue (thanks, Kash), the DNI's lackeys think the label is reaching, and the CIA feels she has plausible deniability. What is clear, however, is that China has definitely benefited from her self-interested actions, and she definitely used her romantic proximity to Jensen to achieve that. My understanding is that intelligence agencies often try to groom or coax such "useful" people to steer them into being more efficient/productive/relevant in their activities; so they're assets, even if they're not field agents.