Against my better judgement, I fell for their trick for my personal domain and put it on google about 10 years ago (that has 5 users on it, all family). I will be looking to move off it, as it's clunky with outlook anyway, and I want family calendars to actually work, and it's clear they don't want to keep us free users.

It's just a matter of wanting to torch a day of my life to decide and rehost and wanting to land on a host that isn't going to make me keep migrating, but just take a little money every year to keep it.

It's so nuts. Between datacenters increasing demand and our state laws in WA making us close some of our plants, our energy costs are going up like 15% PER YEAR. I can't wait until I get my new garage built so I can cover that roof with solar to at least offset some of my usage. I think energy is going to keep going up, up, up. Hedging your use is going to pay off.

There is a massive shortage of doctors,and we can not affrord to train and hire more.

To expand care with the same money, we have to innovate and let technology help us scale the very expensive and rare humans we have.

The question isn't "would it be better to have a highly trained radiologist take the first pass or an AI?" The question is, would I rather screen 100 women with a 90% accuracy rate (human) or 1000 women with an 85% accuracy rate (AI).

I also believe you can continually train the AI to get better at "first pass" inspections, vs humans are potentially as good as they'll get and any improvement in quality of detection might be very marginal.

or even more worse... it's a feature, not a bug

10k MILES in the US for many makes and models is being recommended, and it's too long.

In enthusiast communities, we've seen that 5K miles (ie, around 10k kilometers) drastically reduces engine issues over the long haul.

Same, unless I'm using up some credit card points, I just book directly with the airline and the hotel as much as possible. They will generally bend over backwards to help direct book people before they do whatever they can for those who booked third party.

Exception, at work we use AMEX travel, and they get stuff done for us. I assume that because they represent so many large company travelers and they negotiate for good rates, but aren't the ones going for the $40/night room specials the hotels and airlines offer them good cancellation policies.

Or, it requires us to deregulate to an extent that whether it is "favored" or not, it simply doesn't take multiple years to get freakin' building permits.

This country is choking on regulation that discourages investment and makes a lot of stuff never get done because it's just a pain in the butt and takes forever to do regulatory approval for bog standard development or improvement.

Our state government pressured our utility (who mostly uses hydro and some NG) to dump their one small coal plant. Since then, they are paying spot prices far more often. Since they can't raise consumer rates much, they are laying folks off like crazy internally to try to stay afloat, so it takes forever to get work done.

Thank you WA state!

You don't work in a Fortune 500 company, eh?

Public companies do ALL KINDS of things aligned to the quarter. It's exhausting and there is a ton of pressure to do this or that within this quarter. I think a little longer "lens" will provide more insight to investors and cause less constant churn within companies so they can focus more on providing value and less on getting A, B and C done within a specific quarter.

But, according to TFS, births still outnumbered deaths by 1/2 million "Last year, births outnumbered deaths by 519,000 people"

So the reduction in population is just due to lower immigration and greater outmigration, not due to a negative birth rate.

In fact, if our country of 330M were to grow by 500k/year net, it seems like this would be a small but positive growth rate.

If we get our net population growth to 5-6M/year, I would argue that's sustainable, so we would need either some net immigration or better birth rates from the folks already here

If we feel the need to move transuranics off planet, I would argue for the moon. That way future humanity could still recover it if needed and it wouldn't be completely impossible.

On the code updates, you're right, but it wouldn't replace 2x4 and 2x6 and 2x8 you use in walls and floors. Those are driven as much by other factors (spacing required to nail sheetrock too) and depth needed for insulation to function than they are structural requirements.

Where it would be powerful in residential is when you are replacing steel or Glue-lam beams. In those cases, a structural engineer is calculating the loads on each beam and spec-ing it in the permit with the calculations, so the city wouldn't care that it's the same dimensions as the other beam, just that it's calculated to carry the load.

Commercial and industrial is similar, it's all calculated not spec'd as in "use 2x6 for walls" like we see in residential code.

It would be interesting if it ends up as cheap as gluelam beams but much more compact so that you don't have beams dropping below the ceiling while still having the ability to carry the load. This would be very interesting, especially if you can use wood hangars and fasteners and not have to bring in a steel guy to a jobsite for a single beam. If your regular framers can handle it, it would reduce costs and time to build.

This guy has been at a corp job!

If you even get wind that you might have a PIP coming (even if performance is good, if you have a new manager that doesn't gel with you), you should be job hunting 100% of the time you're not doing everything possible to satisfy the current leadership.

If it gets to the point where they offer you PIP or VSA, the only reason to consider PIP would be if you have someone in another department that will hire you immediately. Since this is really hard to do (managers don't walk around with unfilled reqs), 99% of the time, take the VSA vs months of micromanagement, stress, and failure that result in you departing anyway.

What about 1973 and 1979? I remember those being pretty big shocks.

In fact, done right, you could also not have dealt with 9/11 and the ensuing decades of tragedy.

Do you not believe though, that consumers and producers will make decisions based on these inputs?

Consumer yesterday has a choice of $1 chinese toy or $1.10 US toy. Chooses Chinese toy.

Tomorrow: If Chinese producer doesn't make any adaptations, they will get $0. US toymaker makes $1.10 no tarrif collected

Our economy is very efficient, that means that even a few percentage change in price/costs of items will have a huge shift.

Chinese producer can either take $0 or lower their price to 90 cents. In that case. Consumer can buy either toy for $1.10, chinese producer makes either $0 or 90 cents, US gov takes either zero or 20 cents.

It's obviously more complicated than that, but I expect, if these hold steady, US production will increase, imports will decrease, prices will rise (but not by 20%), and government income will raise (though not by 20% of today's imports)