You shouldn't fixate on your co-workers, but you should absolutely fixate on the income disparity between the top and the bottom. The world is full of CEOs making high double digit millions who announce staff cuts to save on salary costs. The world is full of filthy rich hoarding wealth in a way that never trickles down.

You should be fixated on this, it's a societal problem that has very real effects on you, even if it's just you getting mugged by a homeless person who may otherwise not be put in a desperate position just so some rich arsehole can claim to be a rung higher on the forbs richest list.

CoAuthoriship doesn't define what exactly was and wasn't generated. I used AI enabled content aware fill in photoshop to remove a piece of rubbish from a photo, is the entire photo now no longer copyrighted?

So far the discussion on LLM generated copyright have been restricted to the complete and total authorship from an LLM tool.

No I don't, especially since CoPilot can't meaningfully claim any authorship or copyright under the current copyright rules. The primary author here remains unchanged as does any attribution in the legal sense.

*This post made by Google Chrome.

What makes you think banning social media will lead to them starting to parent? Bad parents are bad at parenting regardless of what you attribute to the immediate cause.

No it doesn't. It is an attack that requires the ability to execute unprivileged code on a box. Console access is only the demonstration you've seen. Unprivileged code execution happens for any number of reasons through countless bugs in countless software. It's the reason we assign network facing software its own user / group with as few permissions as possible in the first place - the recognition that it's a frequent and trivial attack.

Combine this with the countless exploits for code execution and you get remote elevated access to a system. Calling this exploit lame just shows you don't think like an attacker. Virtually all damaging attacks these days are layered and nested exploits.

There are people who paid for self-driving who owned their Teslas for years and then on sold them or got rid of them all without ever actually having the promised feature. Musk has literally promised this every year now for over a decade.

What did you do? Fill in an online form.
What did the lawyers do? Put a team of people working on the case for a significant period of time while applying their taught expertise.

Class Actions are about punishing the company, not making the victim whole. If you wanted the latter you need to refuse to participate in the class and bring a private case at which point damages are awarded to your specific situation and not your ability to type your name into a form.

That's perfectly fine, but this isn't about what consumers want. It's about what Apple didn't deliver despite promising to do so.

I don't know what point you're trying to make. The same DRM is present in HDMI and DP. Just go open the NVIDIA control panel and see that your dp link is to your monitor is currently HDCP compliant to verify this yourself.

The reality is Hollywood has nothing to do with the fact HDMI is on TVs. The standard itself has direct benefits grown from the desires of the AV industry itself. Dp doesn't. That's really all there is to it. You won't get a TVs with DP until remote CEC codes universally transmit over it, you won't get TVs with DP until you can send audio back the "wrong way" down the cable to an AV Receiver.

HDMI simply has more to offer your living room and thus it is ubiquitous.

Sorry :-)

Yeah gotchya. Fully agree with your original point :-)

In a post listing Red Hat and all it's derivatives as a problem? Please man if you are going to make up a conspiracy theory put a bit of thought into it.

Google. Not everything on the internet is correct. There's enough evidence here to say the Ubuntu case is wrong.

This hypothetical place was me taking a random small number to show just how absurd the example can get, and I was assuming the most junior programmer in the example.

I'm well aware that programmers earn more than that.

True, but I'm sure someone is far less concerned about an old embedded system than say a public facing Linux based server running your business.

The human race will survive. But the world will look very different. You think migration is bad now, wait until "undesirable" people start mass migrating from unlivable areas. Fox News will need to dust off the "migration convey" scare tactic again.