Comment I wouldn't blame this on Biden (Score 0, Flamebait) 32
In all honesty, he was hardly even aware of it.
In all honesty, he was hardly even aware of it.
RE the divorces comment, that's a feature not a bug when you realize that what's being uncovered is 100% deeply dishonest behavior.
Personally I don't know why DNA testing at birth isn't mandatory even if it was only to confirm paternity and then disposed.
I'm surprised Europe has t figured out a way to regulate the flood of cheap Chinese crap out of existence. While they have tariffs of their own in some cases they usually just find other ways to enact protectionism to keep foreign competitors out of local industries.
We have at least to some degree, the $175 de minimis is only for customs fees which are only like 5% anyway. VAT is now applied to all packages so the likes of aliexpress and temu include taxes in the price and charge it at checkout, removing some of the advantage.
Obviously that wasn't quite enough becase they're now introducing this $3.5 fee which I haven't even heard of before.
I've been reading a lot about this and for the last 20 years largely the agw global warming advocates have INSISTED that food crops wouldn't flourish in higher CO2 environs (despite obvious logical and ample evidence - cf greenhouses commonly run at higher co2 concentrations for just this reason).
www.purdue.edu/newsroom/archive/releases/2017/Q1/rising-co2-due-to-climate-change-may-not-improve-agriculture,-model-shows.html
Rising CO2 due to climate change may not improve agriculture, model shows
https://yaleclimateconnections...
"A recent Department of Energy report falsely states that rising carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere will boost agricultural yields. In fact, climate change is much more likely to make food scarcer and more expensive. "
https://www.sciencedaily.com/r...
"Carbon dioxide could reduce crop yields" Are we conceding that now? "OK yes it will help them grow but they won't be as nutritious" is th new line?
Just want to be sure I'm current where the argument's at.
What's wrong with you?
Hey, we're going to have a room set up just for breastfeeding.
Should I put in a webcam connected to the internet?
Of course!
This guy either socially engineered his way through a line, analyzed a weakness in the line, or time-traveled from the '90's not realizing we've set up an incompetent but totalizing police-state control grid to interpose every tiny aspect of our lives.
To be fair, "pay on board" is less applicable to airplanes than trains because seatbelts are important in turbulence.
That said, the lack of capacity is widely acknowledged to be a feature of wildly incompetent management.
We just heard they've started a new project to rewrite the air traffic control system for the umpteenth time (and billions and billions later) to hopefully allow for more frequent landings and departures. I fear it won't be specified for AI-assist takeoffs and landings and will be obsolete before it's done.
Better make some more 8" floppies.
"everyone that disagrees with me is stupid!"
Maybe assume that reasonable people can look at facts and disagree, and that's normal, with out assuming you have a magically-endowed monopoly on truth or morality?
Just saying.
What have the Romans ever done for us?
Should I continue or are you so mired in "I hate the free market" double-speak that you are beyond reason?
Fwiw, You know the EPA completely lied about ddt?
Geez if we could only go back to living in caves and 40y life span socialist paradise.
.. it technically IS part of the executive branch.
And it's still funded by fees, not congressional appropriations, yes?
And the commissioners nominated by the president, approved by the Senate, yeah?
So nothing changes.
But please: feel free to resume your fetal position if you like.
It's good to have a second engine but it sure sounds like Gecko isn't long for this world.
IIRC it was Buffet who suggested a 100% tax on gains from any stock traded less than 1 year from purchase.
Hell, even if they put a 1 month buffer, I think it would help.
Says "the voice of Satan".
Perhaps you forgot your sig?
Europe "we have free speech as long as what you say is approved, obviously"
US fell into that 2021-2024, I get it. You need to snap out of it. I hope you do.
I do find it
Germany ROARING that they're remilitarizing and Mertz pounding the podium very Kruschevian...sure. As if everyone will just *forget* that Germany a) did NOTHING since UKR was invaded in 2014. I think they sent some helmets when Trump was (the first) sending actual military weapons to UKR? b) Germany couldn't be dragged away from being all snuggled up to Nordstream 2 until that was
The idea that "after Ukraine Russia will certainly attack Europe" might be politically useful but is breathtakingly stupid from anyone not in Latvia, Estonia, Poland, or Lithuania (who all have legitimate reasons to be nervous). To invent that Putin is somehow cracking his knuckles over the opportunity to conquer Europe as soon as possible couldn't be more laughable...unless it happens to now be coming from the EXACT PEOPLE who insisted in their younger days that the Russians would never do such a thing.
HILARIOUS.
You seem to forget, as the slashdot ideologues will certainly remind you, that "hating Elon and everything he does" is likewise the 'fad of the day'.
The Sahara has turned a lush green wildland 230 times in the last 8 million years, as recently as 9000 years ago.
I 1000% guarantee you, if there were leftists then, they absolutely INSISTED this was humans' fault.
https://theconversation.com/th...
Hint: The warming effect of each molecule of CO2 decreases significantly (logarithmically) as its concentration increases. This is scientific fact. There was no "runaway greenhouse effect" on earth even when CO2 was MULTIPLES of where it is today.
You are an insult to my intelligence! I demand that you log off immediately.