These robots don't "consume" anything. They can attach to each other with what looks like magnets. That is all.

It's quite suspicious given that multiple other, older LLMs have no trouble with this question and OP provides no evidence, not even a convincing copy paste. What AI just spits out a list of numbers without surrounding text explaining their thinking these days?
And yet OP is rated informative. Really tells us a lot about the user bias vs critical thinking that is happening here

Gemini 2.5 nails this easily

>> give me 5 odd numbers that don't have the letter e in them

This is a classic riddle! The trick is that **no odd number** in English has a name that doesn't contain the letter "e".

### Here's Why

Every odd number must end in an odd digit (1, 3, 5, 7, or 9). Let's look at how we spell those digits:

* on**e**
* thr**ee**
* fiv**e**
* s**e**v**e**n
* nin**e**

Since all of them contain the letter "e", any odd number you can think of will also have an "e" in its name (for example, "thirt**ee**n" or "twenty-fiv**e**").

***

### Even Numbers Without "e"

However, if you're looking for numbers that don't have the letter "e", there are plenty of **even** ones. Here are five examples:

* Two (2)
* Four (4)
* Six (6)
* Thirty (30)
* Forty (40)

At least microsoft allows you to install a different browser engine

Unless the IT dept tried to implement security and proper backups and were denied, this is the IT departments fault. Some random employee with a weak password can't cause the loss of a properly implemented network.

What is your basis for thinking LLMs don't improve? Genuinely, where does that come from. All the charts and benchmarks and records I see are going up every time there is a new one.

If computing has taught us anything, it's that they tend to improve in capability

yes, but google bad apple good

Apple only enforces its rules when it's profitable. Allowing these superapps is more profitable than forbidding them, so the rule are not enforced.

A few years ago I may have paid a few dollars to have some QR code stickers printed with links to a website discussing how insecure scanning a QR code in the wild is. I may also have put them over the top of a few "scan here for X" things I found in the wild.

you're comparing quotes about two different things.

"Today, we’re announcing that there are more than 1 billion monthly active viewers of podcast content on YouTube."

vs

"Last year, viewers watched over 400M hours of podcasts monthly on living room devices."

You can't do any meaningful maths with these two figures.

open standards like iMessage and Facetime, right?

Apple good. Google bad. I love my chosen corporate god and foresake all others.

I have read a few places that it also only applies to Pixel phones sold by Verizon

this time it's for real