It wouldn't be a canon without some retconning. It was easier back then though. Scrolls get lost so easily. Unfortunately a lot of really great fanfic got decanonized too. Enoch is wild.
In many California cities, it costs almost that much just for a permit to have amplified sound at an outdoor concert for a few hours, on top of the venue fees. $1,000 a day for public advertising is priced like a fee, so of course they treat it like a fee. $100k per day would shut that down.
Christianity really wants to be monotheistic, so the Jewish god is the Christian god, his son is really himself, and there's this ghost involved too, but it is also the same. Not *the same* of course, they kicked a dude out for saying that, but the same. Oh, and don't say that what Jesus said is incompatible with what that god guy said, because that got another dude kicked out.
And yet you run the executable no problem?
Conclusions are usually baloney. So much so that lots of journals discourage even having them.
Typically retracted papers do come with a notice stating why they were retracted.
People kept pointing out that "human resources" is pretty dehumanizing so they came up with friendlier sounding names.
It's not permanent. The half life under normal circumstances is a few hours.
Motors in the seat stem apparently.
Professor objected to his use of the STL in a data structures class.
The drinking is harder than you think. An MBA once showed me that it's very important to hold your drink in your left hand so your right is warm and dry to shake hands. It takes real practice.
You're nicely illustrating the issue with AI reasoning. Humans "reason" mostly by deciding what they believe then coming up with truthy stories to support that belief. When confronted with actual conflicting evidence or proper reasoning to the contrary, they make up more stories to "rationalize" it, or, that failing, make excuses.
The reasoning systems are generally made up of an LLM, a bunch of more general purpose neural network layers, and some conventional logic systems. The neural network part comes up with what it thinks is true based on its training, tries to get its logic systems to support it, and, as we've seen, often ignores the result when it doesn't like it.
The problem with AI "reasoning" is that it's a pretty good copy of human "reasoning."
Funny, that's what the production manager said while he was walking away. You don't suppose he'd....
I suppose that's one way to keep the (probably mostly single male) software engineers and IT people doing what you want them to do, but I feel like digital managers would be more effective.
Right, I was ignorant of something...so I asked a question. That's generally how things work.
whataboutism is an argumentative fallacy. Doesn't apply here.
So...yes, you were just being a cunt.
You are in a maze of UUCP connections, all alike.
