Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Yes, Signal is open source. (Score 1) 41

And the servers even support federation.

No, it does not. Or rather the central server, which everyone uses, is not federated. The server code supports federation, or it used to (not sure it’s still in there), but it is effectively useless since you can’t federate with the one server with the userbase. If you want federation (and you should), use Matrix.

Comment Re:DVORAK (Score 1) 303

I’d be curious to know the details of your fight. I have been using Dvorak for the last 10+ years and it hasn’t been much of an issue for me. My desktop environment offers Dvorak in the list of available layouts, so it’s just as easy as setting QWERTY (or even AZERTY since I am in France) as your choice. In the rare occasion where someone wants to use my computer, I can either use the current layout as an excuse to do the task myself (which is usually faster anyway), or I can temporarily add a second layout in a matter of seconds.

Comment Re:Karen Sandler is an SJW who almost destroyed GN (Score 3, Interesting) 60

That’s bullshit. That reddit thread takes data on a short period of time and doesn’t take the whole picture into consideration. The GNOME Foundation never diverted money from its budget to spend it on OPW. All expenses had matching income (+ a commission for administrative fees), but they may not show up in the report for the same year. Take the annual reports for 2011—2017 and you’ll be able to see it.

The issue that OPW created for GNOME and that started this rumour was cash flow, because sponsors took too much time to pay their invoices and GNOME ended up fronting the stipends for interns.

Parent should be moded down because it is the opposite of “informative”.

Comment Re:Gnome Shell and two monitors (Score 1) 132

I think I gave it a shot. Just like in their screenshot, the second monitor does not get:

- tray icons - power / logoff / settings icon - clock

Clock can be switched on/off, just like app menu and Activity. You’re right about the other two though.

My second monitor isn't just a side show. It's an alternate primary, depending on what I'm doing. I don't want to look at my left monitor temporarily while I'm focused on the right. E.g. I have an applet that tells me if my Caps Lock is pressed because my laptop doesn't have a Caps indicator light at all.

Fair enough. Maybe raise the issue to the extension maintainer?

And I don't recall very well, but I think maximised windows behave differently on the second monitor in regards to title bar and menu bar than they do on the first. I have a hazy memory of being unable to get the close/max/min triplet because it wasn't shown at all on the second one.

Seems to work exactly the same on both screens for me here.

Comment Re:I tried (Score 1) 132

Why is it so hard to change the default terminal?

What exactly makes a terminal application the default one? It’s not like the default video player that will open when you double click on a video file, or your default office suite. Installing another terminal application makes it appear alongside the previous one. What more do you need?

Why is the nautilus menu so counter intuitive?

That’s a bit of an empty statement and can’t be addressed if you don’t elaborate on what’s wrong or why it’s wrong.

Why, after installing an application with the gnome package manager thinger, can I not find my new application in the list of installed apps?

It should work. Maybe you hit a bug? Worth checking if it’s been reported and file a new one if that’s not the case.

I mean, even windows will search around the file system in various folders of convenience and show relevant results if what you're typing isn't found.

I’m not sure what you’re talking about here. Do you have an example of something you searched, where you searched for it and what a relevant result on your system would have been?

I can't remember what the last straw was, but I installed xfce (again) and never looked back.

If XFCE makes you happy, that’s good.

Comment Re:Irksome way to do this... (Score 1) 132

Since when did the user's choice of desktop become an operating system decision?

(Most) distributions don’t make any decision regarding your choice of desktop environment. You can e.g. run KDE or GNOME or XFCE or something else on Ubuntu, as well as Fedora, or openSUSE. The correct question would have been since when did the version of the desktop environment become a distribution decision, which boils down to the version of software being a distribution decision, and the answer would be forever. It has been precisely the job of distributions to carefully select compatible versions of a set of software pieces since distributions were a thing.

Not that distribution packagers give a crap about what users want but, IMHO, the desktop software ought to get pulled out of the "/usr/..." tree and placed under "/opt/desktop/..." and be updatable on the user's schedule and not require a damned OS upgrade (except when there are underlying library dependencies).

Mind you, for desktop applications you could switch away from the distribution packages to something like flatpak and have the newest GNOME applications as soon as GNOME releases them. This is precisely what it’s about, shifting the balance of software delivery back towards the ones who make the software.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Consequences, Schmonsequences, as long as I'm rich." -- "Ali Baba Bunny" [1957, Chuck Jones]

Working...