Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system


Forgot your password?
Get HideMyAss! VPN, PC Mag's Top 10 VPNs of 2016 for 55% off for a Limited Time ×

Comment Re:Oh boy (Score 1) 381

Almost certainly, but it has to piss Bernie Sanders supporters off. This is a guy who supports deregulating banks, who's anti-abortion, who didn't support LGBT rights until 2011.

The choice makes it clear that any Sanders supporter hoping that at the very least he'd help pull Clinton further left: he failed to do so.

It's unlikely it'll make any difference in the election, but it'll be interesting to see if this helps Hillary's recent collapse in the polls. (My guess is no - 538 says they expect it to make an 0.7% difference in her chances overall. Sanders supporters were never in swing states so for the most part they simply don't matter.)

Comment Re:Why? (Score 5, Insightful) 455

They haven't nominated Hillary yet. Her coronation is next week at the Democratic National Convention. Which means it's still conceptually possible that they could nominate someone else.

They won't, of course. But it's still theoretically possible. In some other universe where criminals get charged for their crimes.

Comment Re:They misread Sony's comment (Score 1) 57

I don't buy that explanation because they already stopped updating the game last year. If they're keeping the servers running (they are) and they're no longer doing any development (they aren't) there's no reason to arbitrarily kill cross platform support. Unless they're being forced to by some outside party.

It's not like they updated the PC client in such a way that the PS2 client stopped working. They actively removed support for a previously functional PS2 client, for no explained reason.

Comment Re:Someone Please Explain The Glitch (Score 2) 80

Some of the Pokestops are apparently paid ads from businesses. (I know that Ingress portals could be paid ads for businesses as well, so this isn't surprising.)

If we're going to talk about this stupid game, might as well mention that apparently their method of monetizing is making it impossible to catch Pokemon after you break a certain level, requiring you to buy "better" Pokeballs for real money or something along those lines.

Comment Re: Just what the world needs (Score 1) 268

Why? Destroying Gawker is probably the single most noble thing he's ever done. It almost makes up for founding PayPal.

Gawker is a shitty, entirely morally bankrupt "news" website and needed to be destroyed. If every one of Gawker's website vanished tomorrow, the world would be a better place. No one will miss Gawker.

Comment Re:Try polling people with security clearances (Score 1) 482

Yep. Every year I'm forced to go through a "refresher course" that includes reminders not to send classified material through email, you morons. Complete with the world's simplest multiple choice quiz to prove that I did, in fact, understand that "don't send classified material through email" means "don't send classified material through email." (Along with a whole bunch of other silly things, like "do you give that hot lady at the bar classified information so she'll sleep with you? A) Yes, I'm David Petraeus, B) No, I understand that classified material can only be given to others in a very specific set of circumstances.")

I thought everyone with a clearance was supposed to take some form of training class but I'm betting Hillary Clinton somehow, for some reason, managed to skip it and that's why they can't show "intent."

I'm also betting that the real reason that "no reasonable prosecutor" would indict is because they don't want to risk the chance of losing the case or it going all the way to the Supreme Court. Because you know that, Hillary Clinton being a lawyer, such a case would drag out for years. Would you want to the prosecutor that derailed the campaign of the who might have been the first woman president, only to end up with an acquittal? Or, worse, with the case going to the Supreme Court and a precedent being set that, yes, you in fact do need clear criminal intent to prosecute? Your career would be over.

That's the major issue - apparently the statutes are vague enough that it's possible Clinton could successfully argue that as there was no clear criminal intent, she can't be charged. And nobody really wants to test it - so she skates instead.

And we're already moving on to the inevitable Phase Two of this whole thing, where her aides that set up the server and were forced to use it as the only way to reach her get their careers ended as the State Department punishes them for Hillary Clinton's misdeeds.

Comment Re:so....gamergate was right (Score 2) 81

Really? Were you just ignoring it then?

It was even covered on Slashdot at the time.

There was plenty of outrage at the time.

Even in 2007 you can see plenty of people with the opinion that the game journalism industry is simply corrupt to the core and aren't surprised at all to see a journalist fired for giving an advertiser a bad review.

Comment Re:So, in short... (Score 2) 109

Pretty much.

This is exactly the same as those old Windows apps that would only run as admin, even if they didn't really need admin privileges. Sure, they might not do anything particular evil with admin privileges that they don't really need.

But only half the issue with Windows programs requiring admin access was the potential for the program itself doing something evil. Half the problem was security flaws in said programs being used by malicious third parties.

It gets worse with games like Pokemon Go where half the game is on the server. Sure, Niantic may not be doing anything with their complete access to your Google account today. But if they get hacked in the future or if they later decide they do want to make access of that full access... what then?

The entire reason behind granular permissions is to reduce the damage that can happen when something goes wrong.

And there's also the point where apparently Google never asks you if you want to hand over full control of your Google account to what's now a third party.

Comment Re:And on iOS, you compromise your Google account (Score 1) 110

Beats me, I haven't tried the app yet, I was basing my post on this Ars Technica article.

The comments are suggesting that this issue exists for some Android users as well, but not all.

But, yeah, apparently it skips the part where it asks for permissions (sometimes, always for iOS?) and just gives Niantic full control of your Google account.

Comment And on iOS, you compromise your Google account (Score 2, Interesting) 110

Also worth mentioning that if you log in to the game via your Google Account under iOS, Niantic gets "full access" to your Google account.

Meaning that they can do things like:

1. Read your email.
2. Send email as you.
3. View photos you've uploaded.
4. View your Google+ Profile (OK, no one cares about this).
5. Delete documents from your Google Drive.

In fact, Google lists only three things it can't do: Change your password, delete your account, or authorize payments via Google Wallet. And that's it.

This doesn't apply under Android for some reason, it's limited solely to iOS.

Slashdot Top Deals

Never trust a computer you can't repair yourself.