Speaking of which, the podcast Behind the bastards did a couple of episodes about the East India company:

• Part one: The most evil company in history
• Part two: The most evil company in history

Fourth episode just released:

Part four: Prince Mohammed Bin Salman: The tyrant of Saudi Arabia

Possibly if your neighborhood is DC, New Your or Florida because Donald Trump is a Dinosaur!.

Speaking of which, the most recent episodes from the podcast Behind the bastards is about this bastards:

• Part one: Prince Mohammed Bin Salman: The tyrant of Saudi Arabia
• Part two: Prince Mohammed Bin Salman: The tyrant of Saudi Arabia
• Part three: Prince Mohammed Bin Salman: The tyrant of Saudi Arabia

Trump has been advocating violence for a long time already, it is not like that is something new. Like a lot of times. Even back in the 80s he was advocating for killing innocent children in the Central Park Five case.

The BBC clip was not fake despite what Trump cultist claim. It was just a normal collection of excerpts of a longer speech he gave, condensed down to something shorter for consumption in a news program. That is what all TV news programs does all the time, every single day, thousands of times all around the world.

Could you argue that it slightly changes what he said compared to the full speech? Sure. But a map is inherently not the territory and even translating into a foreign language slightly changes things. And translators have a really hard time accurately translating Trump's incoherent ramblings.

And with regards to pulling a Steve Jobs, the podcast Behind the bastards does a good job of explaining why his own ego and stupidity was the reason he he died form one of curable forms of cancer. As well as exposing his other shitty behaviours.

• Part one: The terrible secret of Steve Jobs
• Part two: The terrible secret of Steve Jobs
• Part three: The terrible secret of Steve Jobs
• Part four: The terrible secret of Steve Jobs

And why is UK so dependent on gas? Because Margaret Thatcher ruined a well run public infrastructure for short term gain and made producing electricity from gas the most viable option for making money fast because who cares about long term stability? And also, who cares about ordinary people gets worse outcome out of privatization as long as rich people can get richer?

Tom Nicholas has an excellent video about this, How energy privatization is bankrupting Britain

To the point that the official energy production dropped 10% year over year recently (because people install their own, independent solar panels).

This was mentioned by author Bill McKibben in a podcast episode of Why is this happening?

And who is to blame for that?

Of course it is the anti-science, anti-public health republicans.

So you want to appear to be very rational, right? And you want people to believe that you argue in good faith, right?

Well, are you able to form a sound and formally valid argument that contains the phrase "no one has changed the measles vaccine requirement in 2025" and a corresponding conclusion?

Has RFK, jr actually spewed out TONS of misinformation and antivaxx propaganda? Yes, he did(1).

If you do not see any problem with the current administration I can only see three possible reasons, either you

• are extremely ignorant
• do not care because you (incorrectly) think it does not affect you (negatively)
• are chearing on because you think they are hurting the right people

Which is it?

(1)
https://apnews.com/article/robert-f-kennedy-vaccines-trump-rfkjr-7f8dcb25de76a5a70710d22bbc63f6fa/
https://time.com/7210943/rfk-confirmation-hearing-vaccines//
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/rfk-jr-s-history-of-medical-misinformation-raises-concerns-over-hhs-nomination//
https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.36YC9GW/
etc

He most certainly have!

Facebook and genocide: On the importance of new evidence for Meta’s contributions to violence against Rohingya in Myanmar

Abstract
For the broad public increasingly critical of technology companies, the Rohingya genocide in Myanmar
has come to illustrate the evils of Facebook and its parent company, Meta. At the same time, the
Myanmar case has become an influential template for understanding the dangers of social media, past,
present, and future, as well as developing solutions. Yet this template is strikingly narrow: it has been
limited to content that negatively characterizes the victim group, such as through hate speech and
misinformation. As a result, most extant analysis has excluded other processes that scholarship on
genocide has also shown to be significant: practices aimed at constructing not the victims of genocide
but those who are supposed to support it. This paper therefore analyzes some of these practices as
they involved Facebook in Myanmar, offering new interpretations of publicly available evidence and
drawing on observations from work in Myanmar during 2012-15. It then concludes by discussing the
relevance of these initial findings for ongoing efforts to pursue restitution and accountability and
proposes concrete questions that could be taken up in these efforts as well as by scholars and
practitioners.

Why the hell do you think companies have any rights other than what politicians allow them to do?

And when pressed to define what "woke" actually means, they universally fail to come up with a definition. Even an "author" having written a book about it fails to be able to define woke.

Speaking of dinosaurs with tiny hands.