Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Interesting (Score 4, Informative) 54

maybe partly, but the reality I know as someone who reads a lot of penetration testing reports, is big supposedly mature organizations end up putting useful credentials (as in not just some QA mock enviornment nobody cares about in CI/CD stuff) in their git commits, all the freaking time.

Cloud security is a s*** show a lot of places, even places with mostly capable people, it only takes one idiot or one careless person to really mess things up badly. That is the problem with PaaS/SaaS model generally.

Comment Re:Why is this surprising?? (Score 0) 84

Except it absolutely is Embrace-Extend...

It is embrace Linux, just so long as your are running it on their compute...It is extend Linux,they have already used their influence to stuff all manor of rather cloud-specific tooling into systemd, and successfully crammed that stack down on the broader community.

Finally it is extinguish in the software freedom sense the GNU side of GNU/Linux always cared about. Unless your are like beyond careful about every component you use, every bit of tooling you chose, and every other architecture decision you make the odds of anyone not a large enterprise being able to shift their application from Azure to some other cloud or their own compute/hosting is low. If you really do go the truly cloud agnostic route, you'll be giving up a lot of the value add features of the platform and paying a higher bill at the same time.

Comment Re: Federal Bribery and Taxpayer Abuse. (Score 0, Troll) 97

I don't disagree but the problem is identifying when we jumped the shark. Which I think happened damn near 100 years ago now when the SCOTUS blinked and let a lot of the New Deal happen.

We have now gone so long without 'keeping up with Amendments' in terms of actually enabling the Federal government to do so much of what American's of all political stripes currently view as good/necessary/appropriate it is really difficult to take "Textualism" to the logical destination it really ought to be taken. The 'soft textualism' we get from current conservative wing of the court is probably the best we can really hope for.

If you really for example did a legitimate read of the 9th and 10th amendments, probably half or more of Federal laws are unconstitutional or at least could not be applied to 90% of the instances they are. It would break our society...

This is real problem people who immediately shut down conversations around national divorce, or moving toward greater State level sovereignty as in letting people start thinking of themselves more as "Virginians, Floridians, New Yorkers", etc rather than "Americans" can't accept. We let a 80 years of sloth and neglect pass by as far rigorously applying the Constitution and using the Amendment process for real rather than feel good issues like Senate elections, and as far as keeping the American experiment on course, I am not sure you can get there from here now.

Comment Re:Yes and no (Score -1, Troll) 97

The most common and Stark example of this are people who prioritize moral panics over economic issues. So somebody who votes for a political candidate who is going to cut services they desperately need because that political candidate promises to protect them from trans girls in sports or ethics in game journalism or the woke mind virus or whatever the current mortal panic is. Back in my day it was violent video games and before that satanic rock music... Kind of miss those days.

Let's break this down. Setting aside your particular moral views on any of the issues you just mentioned, you basically said people should ignore issues of morality and vote based on what is good for them economically. This is what a lot of mean when we say the political left are not 'good people'. It isnt even about any specific position what it comes down to is you really don't care or value 'goodness' it is ONLY about what you get personally in terms of wealth and security, and ideally in your minds at the expense of everyone else.

If we listened you rsilvergun, chattel slavery would still be a feature of the American economy. You'll deny it of course, and you'll agree salvery is bad but only because parroting some accepted social/moral position is means to end. The entire moral panic is a project too, I mean seriously WTF do think the act of calling everyone who disagrees with you bigots, Nazi's, etc is?

Face it when you look deep in side and ask the hard questions of yourself, you'll find you're really terrible person as are the people you defend and support politically.

Comment Creap factor for sure but also very Star Trek (Score 1) 46

"Computer brief me on $subject" is very cool, at least if you had some degree of faith in correctness.

Briefings are by definition going to contain some over simplifications. Something like Marketplace's "Make me smart" is probably a good format for audio to be consumed while doing something physical driving, laundry, splitting logs, cutting the lawn etc..

Comment Re:Untrustworthy is an Understatement (Score 1) 30

They patched it rapidly only to have a very similar vulnerability affecting the very same components drop like a day later.

Arguably the patching effort lacked real analysis, that should have been triggered, and got pushed out with the first obvious fix applied. On the other hand leaving users with only the option to implement a workaround that disables ipsec while a full fix is investigated, is also a problem...

I am not criticizing anyone here, disclosure vs time to patch, and regression avoidance in complex software systems is a difficult problem. While it speaks to things like code quality and security priority, I don't think when it comes to large software projects you can really charaterize either of those things with a methodolgy that amounts SELECT COUNT(*) FROM cve WHERE project = ....

Comment Re:Former teacher here (Score 1) 132

What rubbish.

You must be one of those uneducated because in terms of most of things you mention there kids today have it better than almost all children throughout history, with possibly the narrow exception of those of us lucky enough to be born between the end of WWII and maybe 2001 in the USA anyway.

For anything you wrote there to be sensible we'd have to assume that the above cohort is the only mentally health group of children in most of history.. LOL

There are stupid posts, and there are rsilvergun stupid posts, this is one of the latter an amazingly it isnt even an rsilvergun post...

Comment Re:All teachers work their asses off (Score 1) 132

This complete bullshit. I have multiple teachers in the family. First through third year teachers work a lot. After that you mostly just refresh stuff a little bit at a time.

As to your whole Vietnam fairy tail also nonsense, but cause it completely neglects the demand side of the equation. It is not like any little town or burg anywhere just build some more schools and added classrooms because there was glut of teachers on the market. Honestly the stuff you post here, is fucking retarded dude, it does not pass even the basic smell test, let alone 10 seconds of google research anyone can do because they are already accessing a website.

So now we return to teacher pay... No you won't get rich, but you get incredible job security, summers off, and PTO during the year, generally solid benefits, and also a very average salary on an hourly basis using actual school days + required in service days. Is that a compensation structure that is ideal for every house hold, possibly not, but that is NOT the same saying they are under paid, in terms of career and time investment vs market value of total compensation.

Comment Re:Why Johnny can't read. (Score 1) 132

That and this

The study found that the slowdown in learning coincided with two major shifts in American childhood and education policy: the widespread dismantling of test-based accountability systems

We took away accountability because it hurt little Johny's "feels" and Shaikwa moaned it was 'racist'

Comment Re:Seems like a strange move. (Score 1) 49

it's because what is being passed of as 'philosophical' is stupid; rather than because they are

Which a really good documentary might, simply offer the statement or some analysis to the effect that John and Yoko where conceptual artists and not everything they record offered great insights, but we can take a listen anyway to perhaps gain some insight into their process.... During which for visuals you don't then need to try and represent the conversation, you probably just show them and what their surroundings might have been at the time.

I don't know I have heard the subject materials either but at least on the surface here it seems like perhaps the wrong problem is being solved here. He notes he ran out of money. So was the real problem that he ran of actually interesting material he could produce on his budget said "i have stretch this thing out another 20min here, lets just play this old tape of some conversation that did not really go any place and does not add anything but hey it will run the clock, if play the melody of Imagine in the background his fans will watch anything" which then lead us to "ok now what can I put on the screen to while I play this"

Comment Re:Seems like a strange move. (Score 1) 49

The other question is why would you want abstract imagery to accompany a philosophical conversation?

I don't see how that could ever be helpful in a documentary where we are supposed to be learning about what Lennon and Yoko were thinking.

Either philosophy has some concrete premises that can be shown, and should be to help anchor the conversation or it is going to be ideas of a conceptual nature that does not have an visual representation that people would understand in a shared way.

I fail to see how some machine-generated-acid-trip to distract viewers from what is being said helps anybody.

Comment Re:Check your logic. (Score 1) 108

Wrong again. I am running modern catalytic equipped wood stoves. They are 80% efficent and should be effectively reburning in particulate.

So if anything only slightly dirtier in terms of smoke stack emissions vs the natural gas or propane counter parts, and using a renewable fuel. Similarly my wood lot is great space for wild life and preservation of bio diversity.

I would bet the environmental foot print of my home, and domestic energy use is rather dramatically less than yours.

Comment Re:Check your logic. (Score 1) 108

That is dumb. I have a multi-stage electric heat pump more than capable of keeping my entire home warm enough. I also have a wood stove, and ~18 or so acres of wood lot.

The cutting and splitting wood is great exercise. Probably does me more good than any gym membership ever could.

Other than the time I put in, which for me is again at that odd nexus between recreation and chores. Kinda like lawn mowing is for a lot guys, the wood is free and renewable. The soil and conditions here are such that all the oaks grow to ~150 or so then tend die out or blow over. If I thinned the woods very selectively I assume many could get bigger. I just harvest the ones that either are not doing well, or are way to near the butt of another; but mostly I just cut up what falls down on its own. - So the wood is as close to "free" as anything in life gets.

Which brings us to the stove. It is a hell of a lot quieter than the force air heat too. Unlike the sad tepid warmth of the air that comes from the heat pump you get that nice intense heat that feels so good when you come in from outside if you stand right by it. A few fans and the entire house is comfortable and the loud electric monster can stay off.

Guests enjoy watching the fire thru the glass, so do I on my own some evenings.

In short in the right situations wood for heat is wonderful! Far better than the 'modern' solutions. Although I'll grant you if you have a 1/8 acre suburban lot and are having someone deliver cord wood by truck to you - ok I'd probably skip the stove too.

Slashdot Top Deals

It seems intuitively obvious to me, which means that it might be wrong. -- Chris Torek

Working...