But we ship out our electronics to be landfilled in other countries.

"When we need medical care, we expect decisions about our treatment to be made by our doctors, not a tech company's algorithm,"

Yeah, that's the expectation of people who are new. They haven't seen an insurance company or Medicaid (or Medicare) deny treatment, or seen an employee at the SSA with no medical training deny an application for disability.

Short term, might be possible.

Medium term, not possible yet because the machines will break down and they aren't designed to be maintained by other machines.

Long term, possible but complex without at least having humans do inspections.

If they know about it and don't do anything to stop it, then they share liability. They can both be sued.

CBS reports that:

an L3Harris contractor was working in a remote FAA location and switching old copper wire to fiber while replacing a router. The router that was being switched then started flooding other routers, overloading the system. There were 1,000 attempts to log on every four to five seconds, he said.

The network DDoS'ed itself.

If the system is designed so that a couple of routers in one spot can make it necessary to ground everything, the design is bad. Saying they need $50B stat is wild when it clearly wasn't done right the first time with however much was spent so far.

Harming Microsoft both causes harm now and reduces later harm done by Microsoft. What's the net?

It's only a matter of time before the US Government goes private and merges with Amazon, they'll be getting your call recordings to feed to Amazon Transcribe in short order anyway. Luckily it's actually shit so it will get all of the numbers wrong and decide you said you would do things you said you wouldn't and vice versa.

Child rape enthusiasts came to try to hide facts.

Slashdot has become a haven for child rape lovers and Nazis, but I repeat myself.

hahahahahhahahahahahah no.

It absolutely is not making it yourself. If it were, you'd be able to get a copyright on your slop.

I enjoy being able to get stuff made by AI, but I'm not doing it. I'm guiding the process, but it is fundamentally not my work.

revealed

Take my dick out of your mouth before you speak again. You're mumbling.

That is exactly the lie I was speaking of which you are repeating. Thanks for finding that, liar!

I ain't seen him sieg heil yet

But that is not what Google is referring to. They are saying that schools cannot have the normal search without the AI hallucinations. Also, if AI is meaningfully involved with Google's traditional search results, then that only serves to explain why they are so shit now. But most importantly, this argument is the one that Google wants us to have, and it is bullshit.

The schools are not, in general, making a moral objection to AI. They are making a practical one, where they do not want the students exposed to a chatbot while a human is trying to teach them something sans hallucination. Having a discussion about whether the traditional search results have any AI in them is fundamentally disingenuous, which is why I am 0% surprised to see you engaging in it.

We had that joke today on Teams.

Other employee: Looks more like Office 364
Me: I think it's more like Office 363 now

Assorted smiley reaccs ensue.

Either thing would be better than this. This is fucking chaos.