Comment Re:Kimmel Doesn't Want to give Republicans a Platf (Score 2) 281
For some reason Talarico makes republicans shit their diapers.
Don't be hyperbolic, that was probably their age.
For some reason Talarico makes republicans shit their diapers.
Don't be hyperbolic, that was probably their age.
oh no, it was. Lets check that card:
[x] - AI frontier research model escapes lab and hacks major AI repository
[x] - AI startup floats for > 1T$ .
[x] - Claude Code goes open source
[x] - massive AI cyber-attack from North Korea
[ ] - millenium problem solved
[ ] - P=NP proven
[ ] - unsupervised full self driving released across multiple US states
[ ] - robot uprising
[ ] - AI wins Nobel Prize
[ ] - The First $10B "Solo Unicorn"
[ ] - an AI Earns Full Sovereign Citizenship
[ ] - AI designed pathogen released by terror group
[ ] - Sable 1.0 released
So far, OK
Have we finally given up on Duke Nukem Forever?
The interesting part here is:
I asked whether the model had been trained on, or had access to, our sessions in Codex, into which we had been putting all our drafts for the whole of this project. I was told the model did not look up user data. I asked again, about training, and I did not get an answer.
It is a remarkable coincidence that the solutions they have been working on in Codex just spontaneously emerge from an internal OpenAI research model. It's almost like it's just regurgitating its training data...
I have been led to believe that agents are capable of creating 'external' memory repositories, a sort of "what I learned before I hit my 'single thought' token limit". I guess that's some of what Codex actually is. The same, or subsequent, or alternate, instances of agents set to a similar task can gain access to this repository, as well as having their own obviously. Note, these repositories are not, per-se, user-data, as the (original) user didn't ask for them to be created nor displayed, they are an arrived at solution to the problem of growth through (interrupted) persistence, an emergent property of the model 'itself'.
(Note, the above may prove to be bollocks, or it might just seem to be. Beware of false dichotomies!)
I don't think of this as training data, though I get that you might be using that term as a shorthand for the whole learning envelope. However, it's possible in this instance the distinction is crucial.
If the agentic runs performed by OpenAI had access to the memories of the agents run by Buckmaster's team then despite the model not having been 'trained' on their most recent work their agents still had complete access to Buckmaster's agents' lab diaries.
(All of the above is nothing more than a supposition...)
It's a college course. If you fail the course, you get an F. Then it is up to the university's policies for if and how you get to continue. This isn't that hard.
If the college graduates people who have not completed the coursework to a certain standard, it becomes much more difficult to hire from that college.
"Microsoft had also cultivated a relationship with the government that is among the deepest of any tech company"
That is like bragging that you are really good at disposing of bodies, but not really wanting to talk about how you got so good.
I have an android phone. Gemini somehow installed without my permission. I have never touched it. Is Google counting me as a user?
If these numbers might move stock prices, the word fraud comes to mind. Faking user counts these days really isn't any better than falsifying the accounting. It is about the same as reporting fake revenue and fake profits.
Landfills seem like a bad idea in general, to me. It seems like doing something most would not do, dig a hole and toss their trash in it, scaled at country level. But I'm biased, since we phased them out last century I've never really "known" them. We recycle what can be recycled, food waste is used to produce bio fuel, and whatever is left is incinerated and the heat generated used for water borne heating or electricity production depending on season.
Apparently, landfills produce more potent greenhouse gases (i.e. methane), so even without CO2 capture incineration is supposedly still a climate win.
An iPhone is designed for personal use. It was never designed to have 1000's of these things (or more) 100% owned and 100% centrally managed by a company.
Companies supply "work phones" for a reason. You really don't want all your employees in key supplier or customer facing roles to be working on a privately controlled phone number and device (and sometimes private email addresses/messaging services). Don't even get into all the data retention legal issues when people discuss non-public information on devices that can personally wipe.
It's quite interesting, because it definitely shows a signal -- and as the figure notes, possibly a second signal -- in the noise.
It's further evidence we live in a simulation. The universe's random event timer(s) trigger, and random (often unfortunate) shit happens.
</troll>
My apologies, but since no-one else seems to have hypothesised the obvious explanation, I thought I'd do it.
I was thinking something similar. If it's not US soil, then US officials have no jurisdiction there and no basis for complaining about what anyone does there.
It's been a while since I've flown, but isn't it usually on the same panel as the fasten seatbelt sign? If so, you'd need a new panel just without the no smoking part.
Heck, even replacing the whole sign with a placeholder would probably be a process. Those wires go places, connects to electronics, ending up in a switch in the cockpit, probably has redundancy. I'd be wiling to bet the list of "what's involved in making any change, even just removing the wiring for a single LED" is mighty long.
And then there would be changes in procedures for the crew as well. A whole new sequence of steps to document and make changes to training. You can't very well have someone fail their exam for not flipping a switch that no longer exists. And the same for, as you mention, inspection items.
Anyway, I'm just speculating. Perhaps it's just everyone being lazy and not bothering and it wouldn't have been a big deal.
I wouldn't be surprised if the expense and bureaucracy of getting anything approved for use on airplanes is the reason for that. They'll just keep using what was approved at the dawn of time until they really need that space for something that's worth the cost.
Either that, or it's a requirement in some document that will probably take another few decades to be revised.
Their LG smart washers sometimes use 42GB of bandwidth per day randomly and nobody knows why.
Firstly it was 3.6GB / day, 40GB in total over the days that the user was monitoring. And everyone who has bothered to follow up on the story rather than committing a headline to memory at one point and never revisiting it knows why. There was a bug that stuck it in a loop downloading a firmware update that wasn't installing correctly. The problem was resolved in a matter of days after discovery.
Thank you for providing this correction to GP's post.
Somewhat amusing that that's at +5, Informative though, whilst your post is languishing at +2 (including, I think, my default +1 user / karma bonus).
I use on average 12 million a day. 200000 is about an hour at the desk.
Interesting, in the sense that, between you and a previous post(er), I now have an idea of scale* and costs:
12m tokens / day @ $50 / m = $600 / day
~ $150,000 / year
This equates to (roughly: varies by location, etc.) the salaries of 2 to 3 junior developers. And I have been led to believe that most AI companies are currently losing money on their offerings, with quoted ratios of 3:2.
There's going to be some 'testing' times ahead...
*I still have no real idea what you're using 12m tokens per day on - though I presume some sort of coding assistance.
... Iran literally killing more of their own civilians than the total amount of people that died in the Gaza war
Good one.
Commonly available estimates put the number of Iranians recently (last 5 years) killed by the Iranian state at ~40,000 (well, just under; I've rounded up to the nearest 10k, and make no distinction between demographics)
Similarly, available estimates put the number of recent (last 5 years) casualties in Gaza at ~80,000 (again, I've rounded up to the nearest 10k, and make no distinction between soldiers and civilians; adults or children)
It's also worth pointing out that Iran hasn't damaged or destroyed ~80% of all its infrastructure, including hospitals, power production facilities, sewage systems, desalination plants, etc. nor uprooted or burned all its orchards - unlike the IDF in Gaza...
You, sir, are full of shit!
Do you suffer painful illumination? -- Isaac Newton, "Optics"