Comment Good news for Batman, I guess. (Score 1) 186
Because now, the Penny Plunderer is soon to be out of a job
Because now, the Penny Plunderer is soon to be out of a job
I'd like a phone that I can actually use like a phone, instead of treating it like a delicate, overpriced art piece.
More specifically, I want a phone that's solid, thick so as to allow for a headphone jack and removable battery, and has a camera that, while good, DOESN'T stick out from the back of the phone like a prosthetically enlarged caveman forehead. I'd like for it to have big bezels on the top and bottom so I can watch stuff on my phone without accidentally hitting the screen and completely fucking up the watching experience. I'd like for it to have a display no larger than 5", and it doesn't even have to be all that high-res - I'll take 720x1280 as long as my wish is fulfilled (which it never will be, but we can hope).
Ideally, I'd like for it to run completely FOSS software, and have upgradeable hardware (INCLUDING A MICROSD CARD SLOT), much akin to the Librem 5, which I desperately want to buy at some point. No locked-down bullshit, no invasive always-listening "voice assistant" and certainly no "classic Apple innovation" in the form of working against everything the sensible users want and then charging them a premium to get proverbially fucked over.
Of course, Apple will never heed the word of their users, and will just keep peddling the latest shiny object to spend one grand or more on every 9 months, and that disappoints me greatly.
...and I shall let myself get stung by one, so that I may become "The Amazing Wasp-Dude!!"
Then again, I've never been stung by a wasp or any bee-adjacent insect, so I could just as likely be allergic and die.
Only one way to find out
You can't kill Nokia. They're indestructible.
I'm imagining a body horror monstrosity, like David Cronenberg meets Sepultura's Arise album.
I can just see me using one of these flesh computers, and whatever interface I'm using to interact with it will pop up with the words "kill me"
Now users won't have to see ads, but then the hot moms in your area will be out of business
is whether Elon is able to press a button and remotely blow up the Neuralinks while they're still in these people's heads, just cuz they posted something to Twitter that isn't approved by the regime?
Listen, upfront, I don't give so much as a rat's ass what you use, if it works for you. I personally use X11 since that's what works for me, but I personally have no objection to Wayland.
That said, I'm excited for a potential resurgence in X11's development, but I feel XLibre isn't quite the way to go. In the 3 or so weeks it's been out, Enrico Weigelt (the lead dev) has made it clear that he doesn't really care to test for bugs or keep the project compatible with Xorg. Couple that with the over-politicization of the project (why politics should matter in a software project as innocuous as an Xorg fork, of all things, I'll never understand), and I'm hesitant to give it a try.
Simply put, the project holds no weight, in my eyes, as a valid replacement for Xorg, at least not yet. I think that with a restructuring in the form of dropping the politics and focusing solely on making good, stable, COMPATIBLE software, it could serve as a solid replacement.
But I feel that will not happen. In any event, if there's something positive to come from this, it's that Xorg, in response, has picked up development and seen new contributors who'd rather not associate with XLibre and all its buggy political nonsense.
I'm not gonna immediately turn my nose up at the project right now, but I feel it's not quite there. Like I said, it could be a solid Xorg replacement if it shifts its focus less on inflammatory politics and more on developing better software. I've been watching a thread over on the LinuxQuestions forum regarding the possibility of putting XLibre in Slackware, but Patrick Volkerding, the distro BDFL, shut that down pretty quick (a sensible approach in my book, hence why I love Slackware). I may spin up an Artix VM just to see what the hype's about.
This is just my two cents, and you're free to disagree. If you do, please keep replies civil - I don't care to hear about why "Enrico is so based and redpilled" or why "Enrico is the literal devil." Just don't.
That's my opinion.
EXACTLY what I was going to say, my good sir!
Good to see a fellow Slackware user in the wild
Sell both games and cards. Sell all your stupid TCG addiction bullshit, and supplement that with what people who go to GameStop actually care about: GAMES.
It's in the name for crying out loud. Unless they intend on becoming CardStop.
Putting aside the obvious fact that GameStop will most likely not enforce any buying limits on cards in the name of money, thereby making GameStop a scalper's wet dream, who actually stopped and thought with a straight face that changing your entire business model to accommodate a resurgence in the dumbest yet still undying fad imaginable was a good idea instead of selling the thing you built your company around?
It'd be like if Apple said "hey, we're not making iPhones anymore, we're a Korean restaurant chain now."
If GameStop is still around 10 years from now, I'm predicting they're gonna get into NFTs next. It's the most natural course of progression for a company that's been falling this hard for so long.
Some days I legitimately question what the thought process within these big tech companies' meeting rooms is.
Like, do they honestly think people are gonna be like, "Woohoo, more AI spyware!! Thanks Google, you're the best!
Or do they just realize most average tech consumers are dangerously complacent over the invasive nature of proprietary tech, and use and abuse that "why switch, it's convenient" mindset to capitalize on people's lack of drive to switch to open-source alternatives for wont of their precious convenience, which is rapidly running out as more and more AI slop is added to each product every day, much akin to the late 90s when everything somehow had the internet shoehorned into it?
You know, I think I just answered my own question.
Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature. -- Rich Kulawiec