Comment Don't worry. (Score 2) 13
You can't kill Nokia. They're indestructible.
Comment If this is true, (Score 1) 34
I'm imagining a body horror monstrosity, like David Cronenberg meets Sepultura's Arise album.
I can just see me using one of these flesh computers, and whatever interface I'm using to interact with it will pop up with the words "kill me"
Comment We've won, but at what cost? (Score 1) 11
Now users won't have to see ads, but then the hot moms in your area will be out of business
Comment What I wanna know (Score 1) 29
is whether Elon is able to press a button and remotely blow up the Neuralinks while they're still in these people's heads, just cuz they posted something to Twitter that isn't approved by the regime?
Comment My two cents: (Score 1) 134
Listen, upfront, I don't give so much as a rat's ass what you use, if it works for you. I personally use X11 since that's what works for me, but I personally have no objection to Wayland.
That said, I'm excited for a potential resurgence in X11's development, but I feel XLibre isn't quite the way to go. In the 3 or so weeks it's been out, Enrico Weigelt (the lead dev) has made it clear that he doesn't really care to test for bugs or keep the project compatible with Xorg. Couple that with the over-politicization of the project (why politics should matter in a software project as innocuous as an Xorg fork, of all things, I'll never understand), and I'm hesitant to give it a try.
Simply put, the project holds no weight, in my eyes, as a valid replacement for Xorg, at least not yet. I think that with a restructuring in the form of dropping the politics and focusing solely on making good, stable, COMPATIBLE software, it could serve as a solid replacement.
But I feel that will not happen. In any event, if there's something positive to come from this, it's that Xorg, in response, has picked up development and seen new contributors who'd rather not associate with XLibre and all its buggy political nonsense.
I'm not gonna immediately turn my nose up at the project right now, but I feel it's not quite there. Like I said, it could be a solid Xorg replacement if it shifts its focus less on inflammatory politics and more on developing better software. I've been watching a thread over on the LinuxQuestions forum regarding the possibility of putting XLibre in Slackware, but Patrick Volkerding, the distro BDFL, shut that down pretty quick (a sensible approach in my book, hence why I love Slackware). I may spin up an Artix VM just to see what the hype's about.
This is just my two cents, and you're free to disagree. If you do, please keep replies civil - I don't care to hear about why "Enrico is so based and redpilled" or why "Enrico is the literal devil." Just don't.
That's my opinion.
Comment Re:Slackware (Score 1) 61
EXACTLY what I was going to say, my good sir!
Good to see a fellow Slackware user in the wild
Submission + - The Trump Phone no longer promises it's made in America (theverge.com) 1
ArchieBunker writes: When the Trump Organization launched the Trump Mobile wireless carrier, it also launched a flagship phone called the T1 Phone 8002 (gold version). One of the phone’s main selling points was that it was to be made in America. We figured that was unlikely to be true. And we were right: sometime in the last several days, the Trump Mobile site appears to have been scrubbed of all language indicating the phone is to be made in the USA. (Like, for instance, the huge banner on the homepage that says the T1 is “MADE IN THE USA.” Just to name one example.)
Instead, the Trump Mobile website now includes what can only be described as vague, pro-American gestures in the direction of smartphone manufacturing. The T1’s new tagline is “Premium Performance. Proudly American.” Its website says the device is “designed with American values in mind” and there are “American hands behind every device.” Under Key Features, the first thing listed is “American-Proud Design.” None of this indicates, well, anything. It certainly doesn’t say the device is made in the USA, or even designed in the USA. There are just some hands. In America.
That’s not the only thing that appears to have changed about the phone since its launch last week. It was originally advertised to have a 6.78-inch AMOLED screen, but now the T1’s site says it’s 6.25 inches. The site used to list the phone as having 12GB of RAM, and now doesn’t list RAM at all. It’s not entirely clear what’s happening here — the Trump Organization hasn’t responded to a request for comment — but it looks like Trump Mobile may have switched suppliers for the T1. Whatever’s going on, it’s certainly another reason to doubt whether this phone is for real. (The badly photoshopped image of the phone hasn’t changed, though, so that’s something.)
When Trump Mobile first launched, it was also promising the T1 Phone 8002 would ship in September. Now, the only timing I could find was “later this year.” Probably best not to hold your breath.
Instead, the Trump Mobile website now includes what can only be described as vague, pro-American gestures in the direction of smartphone manufacturing. The T1’s new tagline is “Premium Performance. Proudly American.” Its website says the device is “designed with American values in mind” and there are “American hands behind every device.” Under Key Features, the first thing listed is “American-Proud Design.” None of this indicates, well, anything. It certainly doesn’t say the device is made in the USA, or even designed in the USA. There are just some hands. In America.
That’s not the only thing that appears to have changed about the phone since its launch last week. It was originally advertised to have a 6.78-inch AMOLED screen, but now the T1’s site says it’s 6.25 inches. The site used to list the phone as having 12GB of RAM, and now doesn’t list RAM at all. It’s not entirely clear what’s happening here — the Trump Organization hasn’t responded to a request for comment — but it looks like Trump Mobile may have switched suppliers for the T1. Whatever’s going on, it’s certainly another reason to doubt whether this phone is for real. (The badly photoshopped image of the phone hasn’t changed, though, so that’s something.)
When Trump Mobile first launched, it was also promising the T1 Phone 8002 would ship in September. Now, the only timing I could find was “later this year.” Probably best not to hold your breath.
Submission + - JD Vance joined Bluesky - was banned 11 minutes later. (x.com) 7
RoccamOccam writes: U.S. Vice President JD Vance joined Bluesky with the post "Hello, Bluesky, I've been told this app has become the place to go for common sense political discussion and analysis. So I'm thrilled to be here to engage with all of you." His post included a screenshot from the United States Supreme Court Decision that upheld Tennessee's law barring "gender-affirming" treatments on minors.
He then wrote "To that end, I found Justice Thomas's concurrence on medical care for transgender youth quite illuminating. He argues that many of our so-called 'experts' have used bad arguments and substandard science to push experimental therapies on our youth. I might add that many of those scientists are receiving substantial resources from big pharma to push these medicines on kids. What do you think?".
He was banned 11 minutes later.
He then wrote "To that end, I found Justice Thomas's concurrence on medical care for transgender youth quite illuminating. He argues that many of our so-called 'experts' have used bad arguments and substandard science to push experimental therapies on our youth. I might add that many of those scientists are receiving substantial resources from big pharma to push these medicines on kids. What do you think?".
He was banned 11 minutes later.
Comment Or... simple solution... (Score 1) 30
Sell both games and cards. Sell all your stupid TCG addiction bullshit, and supplement that with what people who go to GameStop actually care about: GAMES.
It's in the name for crying out loud. Unless they intend on becoming CardStop.
Putting aside the obvious fact that GameStop will most likely not enforce any buying limits on cards in the name of money, thereby making GameStop a scalper's wet dream, who actually stopped and thought with a straight face that changing your entire business model to accommodate a resurgence in the dumbest yet still undying fad imaginable was a good idea instead of selling the thing you built your company around?
It'd be like if Apple said "hey, we're not making iPhones anymore, we're a Korean restaurant chain now."
If GameStop is still around 10 years from now, I'm predicting they're gonna get into NFTs next. It's the most natural course of progression for a company that's been falling this hard for so long.
Submission + - Strange radio pulses detected coming from ice in Antarctica (phys.org) 1
alternative_right writes: Rather than reflecting off the ice, the signals—a form of radio waves—appeared to be coming from below the horizon, an orientation that cannot be explained by the current understanding of particle physics and may hint at new types of particles or interactions previously unknown to science, the team said.
Comment Oh... great... (Score 1) 24
Some days I legitimately question what the thought process within these big tech companies' meeting rooms is.
Like, do they honestly think people are gonna be like, "Woohoo, more AI spyware!! Thanks Google, you're the best!
Or do they just realize most average tech consumers are dangerously complacent over the invasive nature of proprietary tech, and use and abuse that "why switch, it's convenient" mindset to capitalize on people's lack of drive to switch to open-source alternatives for wont of their precious convenience, which is rapidly running out as more and more AI slop is added to each product every day, much akin to the late 90s when everything somehow had the internet shoehorned into it?
You know, I think I just answered my own question.
Submission + - WW III is not news yet? No effect on tech? (bbc.com)
An anonymous reader writes: Really surprised not to see any mention of this little development, but maybe everyone is afraid of being accused of antisemitism? Even if I'm "of Jewish descent"? That's how my father used to put it after being raised Orthodox and then losing his religion (all long before I was born). So this is a time for the anonymous option, though I don't think it means much on Slashdot.
My take? Whether or not this attack on Iran escalates into WW III mostly depends on Putin and Xi and whatever secret signals they are sending to Iran. Iran already has plenty of capacity to escalate, and Israel is already a ripe target for dirty bombs... Doesn't even matter if such a drone with uranium gets all the way to its target. This is one of those cases like horseshoes where close counts. Okay, so I don't think [the inscrutable? ;-) ] Xi wants any big wars anywhere, but Putin might be getting desperate and he knows he cannot retire peacefully to one of his dachas.
I've never lived in a predominantly Jewish community, though I have enough exposure to religious communities to know that I don't like them--and I think that's most of the problem with Iran. Probably Israel, too. But I have made a number of Jewish friends and I still remember what one of them said after he spent a couple of years in Israel: "There's such a thing as too many Jews in one place." Sometimes funny isn't.
My take? Whether or not this attack on Iran escalates into WW III mostly depends on Putin and Xi and whatever secret signals they are sending to Iran. Iran already has plenty of capacity to escalate, and Israel is already a ripe target for dirty bombs... Doesn't even matter if such a drone with uranium gets all the way to its target. This is one of those cases like horseshoes where close counts. Okay, so I don't think [the inscrutable?
I've never lived in a predominantly Jewish community, though I have enough exposure to religious communities to know that I don't like them--and I think that's most of the problem with Iran. Probably Israel, too. But I have made a number of Jewish friends and I still remember what one of them said after he spent a couple of years in Israel: "There's such a thing as too many Jews in one place." Sometimes funny isn't.
Submission + - 17-year-old student builds 3D-printed drone in garage, interests DoD and MIT (thinkstewartville.com)
Agnapot writes: While many teenagers devote their free time to social media or gaming, 17-year-old Taylor built a 3D-printed drone in his garage, and has already received an award from the Department of Defense, and is set to join MIT.
The journey began with a simple observation. When Taylor’s younger sister received a consumer drone that delivered only 30 minutes of flight time, the tech-savvy teenager saw room for improvement. Instead of accepting existing limitations, he immersed himself in VTOL mechanics – aircraft capable of helicopter-like takeoffs followed by airplane-style forward flight.
The 17-year-old American prodigy has engineered what experts are calling a game-changing drone innovation. This teenage genius developed a vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) drone that operates more efficiently than commercial models while costing significantly less. His groundbreaking creation has captured the attention of the Pentagon, resulting in $23,000 in awards from the Department of Defense.
The journey began with a simple observation. When Taylor’s younger sister received a consumer drone that delivered only 30 minutes of flight time, the tech-savvy teenager saw room for improvement. Instead of accepting existing limitations, he immersed himself in VTOL mechanics – aircraft capable of helicopter-like takeoffs followed by airplane-style forward flight.
The 17-year-old American prodigy has engineered what experts are calling a game-changing drone innovation. This teenage genius developed a vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) drone that operates more efficiently than commercial models while costing significantly less. His groundbreaking creation has captured the attention of the Pentagon, resulting in $23,000 in awards from the Department of Defense.
Submission + - US Navy Backs Right To Repair After $13 Billion Carrier Crew Left Half-Fed (theregister.com)
An anonymous reader writes: US Navy Secretary John Phelan has told the Senate the service needs the right to repair its own gear, and will rethink how it writes contracts to keep control of intellectual property and ensure sailors can fix hardware, especially in a fight. Speaking to the Senate Armed Services Committee on Tuesday, Phelan cited the case of the USS Gerald R. Ford, America's largest and most expensive nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, which carried a price tag of $13 billion. The ship was struggling to feed its crew of over 4,500 because six of its eight ovens were out of action, and sailors were barred by contract from fixing them themselves.
"I am a huge supporter of right to repair," Phelan told the politicians. "I went on the carrier; they had eight ovens — this is a ship that serves 15,300 meals a day. Only two were working. Six were out." He pointed out the Navy personnel are capable of fixing their own gear but are blocked by contracts that reserve repairs for vendors, often due to IP restrictions. That drives up costs and slows down basic fixes. According to the Government Accountability Office, about 70 percent [PDF] of a weapon system's life-cycle cost goes to operations and support. A similar issue plagued the USS Gerald Ford's weapons elevators, which move bombs from deep storage to the flight deck. They reportedly took more than four years after delivery to become fully operational, delaying the carrier's first proper deployment. "They have to come out and diagnose the problem, and then they'll fix it," Phelan said. "It is crazy. We should be able to fix this."
"I am a huge supporter of right to repair," Phelan told the politicians. "I went on the carrier; they had eight ovens — this is a ship that serves 15,300 meals a day. Only two were working. Six were out." He pointed out the Navy personnel are capable of fixing their own gear but are blocked by contracts that reserve repairs for vendors, often due to IP restrictions. That drives up costs and slows down basic fixes. According to the Government Accountability Office, about 70 percent [PDF] of a weapon system's life-cycle cost goes to operations and support. A similar issue plagued the USS Gerald Ford's weapons elevators, which move bombs from deep storage to the flight deck. They reportedly took more than four years after delivery to become fully operational, delaying the carrier's first proper deployment. "They have to come out and diagnose the problem, and then they'll fix it," Phelan said. "It is crazy. We should be able to fix this."
Submission + - Spaceballs 2 Trailer Drops (ign.com)
TronNerd82 writes: IGN announces that Mel Brooks and Amazon MGM Studios are hard at work on the long-awaited sequel to Brooks' 1987 classic, Spaceballs, a tongue-in-cheek parody of Star Wars replete with Mel Brooks' signature brand of off-color humor. Reports indicate that Bill Pullman and Rick Moranis are set to return to the roles of Lone Starr and Dark Helmet, respectively.
The film is looking towards a release to theaters in 2027 (2027?! That's the combination to my luggage!!) and has just seen a teaser trailer drop, viewable on YouTube. Very likely this will be the last film of Mel Brooks' career, as he approaches the age of 99.
The film is looking towards a release to theaters in 2027 (2027?! That's the combination to my luggage!!) and has just seen a teaser trailer drop, viewable on YouTube. Very likely this will be the last film of Mel Brooks' career, as he approaches the age of 99.
Slashdot Top Deals
Never invest your money in anything that eats or needs repainting. -- Billy Rose
